WEEK 8 DISCUSSION PART 1 - Essay Example

Week 8 Discussion Part Research articles have a different approach in their content representation and interaction with the audience. The articles “Following the Money in Health Care Fraud: Reflections on a Modern-Day Yellow Brick Road” and “Regulating Health Care: From Self-Regulation to Self-Regulation?” by Jacobson and Krause have different approach, despite having similar content. This essay will therefore compare and contrast the two articles in relation to their presentation of facts and arguments.

Both articles investigate Medicare fraud from a qualitative approach and, therefore apply fewer variables. In addition, the researchers used generalized themes to organize the data in a coherent manner (Branthwaite, & Patterson, 2011). Unlike Jacobson, Krause use a closed hypothesis by assuming that people engage in Medicare fraud for economic purpose only. On the other hand, Jacobson approaches the study through an all-inclusive hypothesis that assumes variation in the reasons for engagement in Medicare fraud.

Both articles have similar approach in data representation. The two researchers rely on statistics to represent as the main segment of their data. Statistical facts and other numerical constants are the main numerical facts presented by the researchers. However, the two articles have a slight variation in their interpretation of data. Krause relies on limits to prove most of her arguments. For instance, she claims that the US government spent over $2.5 trillion on health care in 2009. The numerical values are not accurate but they represent the margin of the lowest or minimal value.

To enhance accuracy or reduce workload, researchers are tempted to exclude some variables or restructure their variable space. Similarly, the two articles indicate a great deal of variable space shrinkage. For instance, Krause ignores the efforts of judicial system in cubing Medicare fraud. On the other hand, Jacobson consider time as the most significant variable in his analysis. Research constraints and the inability to apply all variables encountered in a given study is the main source of weaknesses or limitations in a research.

For the purpose of future studies, researchers are encouraged to highlight some of the limitation in their studies. Both articles have significant limitation or disagreements between theoretical and actual inferences. However, both researchers have different approaches in reporting limitations encountered in their studies. Unlike Krause, Jacobson’s article has discrete statements that describe the limitations of the research or the special cases that cannot be analyzed using the presented theories.

Both researchers consider their articles as a basis for further studies and research. In addition, the articles can be used to interpret or represents the broader picture of the US health sector. Both articles point or indicate a deteriorating healthcare sector and continuous loss of confidence among the people. The articles mainly focus on the factors that contribute to Medicare fraud or reasons that make people to engage in the vice. However, the researchers do not explore the implication of an ideal health sector.

In addition, the researchers do not emphasis on the contribution of legal professions and the US judicial system on the issue. These implications are presented in form of research and practice. In conclusion, both Krause and Jacobson articles have a significance degree of similarity in their presentation of facts and arguments. ReferencesBranthwaite, A., & Patterson, S. (2011). The power of qualitative research in the era of social media. Qualitative Market Research, 14(4), 430-440.Jacobson, P. D (2001). Regulating Health Care: From Self-Regulation to Self Regulation?

 Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law. 26 (5) 1165–78.Krause, J. H. (2010). Following the Money in Health Care Fraud: Reflections on a Modern-Day Yellow Brick Road. American Journal Of Law & Medicine, 36(2/3), 343-369