Group Dynamics in the Organization - Outline Example

A group is inclusive of several people who come together with the aim of achieving a common objective to achieve longitudinal characteristics in the behavior of a given p (Robbins, 2007). 

Social identity theory states that individual group dynamics help to obtain a sense of identity and acquire self actualization. This reduces the rate of self-actualization organization. As an illustration from the HS engineering sample, the major conflicts that arise due to the change taking place within the organization include; loss in manufacturing industries, and there is an expectation of a 30% reduction in the financial status of the company. The different group dynamics established had their own needs that lead to the closure of some of them due to poor management.

Group dynamics are concerned with how groups work within an organization. Groups, as the organization develops due to the activities performed by the group members within an organization, group sentiments, and individual interaction within the group. It is in this case that when individuals share a common activity they tend to work hard to achieve the common goal (Frey, 2000). As illustrated in HS engineering firm several group dynamics are established by the management who work to achieve a common goal.

The following factors can be put into consideration so as to manage conflicts within the group that result from the introduction of change within the system. The managers can conduct frequent monitoring of the groups, they can dynamics group rotation among group dynamics. Greenberg (2000) holds the opinion that managers can develop a system that can be used to motivate workers to improve their working conditions which can result in positive outputs. Organizational politics can be controlled by the managers establishing a workflow between rhythms in work-related activities and this does not entail work-related activities.

The managers are encouraged to assess the group from time to time to determine if there is any political influence within it. The managers are to provide support to each group with the visualized company objective that makes the group active throughout the system. For instance, from time to time the manager can keep on changing the sitting position of the groups (Hellriegel, 2003). For groups to perform effectively after the changes, the managers have to look at how they can develop good dynamic groups, and this can be achieved by making the groups form gathering just like in the case of formal meetings (Katz, 2003).

The managers can also ensure high level of association between members wia th the intention of competition status and influence from other groups. The managers can develop rules that can be used to govern the groups. Lastly, managers can ensure the groups work together as a team to achieve the company’s objectives. Bringing a new team into the system requires a well organized procedure outline as follows, well-organized business objectives, and coming up with a group that is characterized by intense confusion and unsurely (Luthans, 2005).

This is a period where the group gets to know each other. The second phase is storming where the group experiences the highest level of disagreement. The managers conduct the naming process where the members of the group identify with other members, the group gets to perform and in this stage, the members get involved and perform their roles. The importance of team building includes improving group members’ relationships, and reducing of chances of confusrelationshipshe group; thus, improving communication within the group. Team building encourages a positive working environment and confidence at work.