Topic: of group dynamics - Essay Example

GROUP DYNAMICS Of group dynamics Understanding group dynamic is crucial in organizational teams. Aamodt (2003) agrees that in a group, whether small or large there are different aspects that make people committed and affiliated in a team in an organization. Group relationships or affiliation is crucial in an organization and can occur via organizational human resource assignment, contact with other groups, relationships and affiliation with other teams in an organization, emotional desire to belong to a certain team, emotional group support and assistance, shared goal and interest.

Based on Hyatt and Rudy arguments, therefore group dynamics is bound to fail if it lacks firm, intentional and profession management support of the team. Therefore, team management support is a relevant aspect to managing organizational team. According to Hyatt and Ruddy 1997) groups that enjoy team managements’ full measure of professional support usually have great success and prosper. Thus is because such supportive management the team develops effective communications strategies that are well established throughout and sets meaningful objective as every member is in support of group processes.

With ineffective communication and little team management support a group cannot flourish, for instance, Workforce Central Florida group lacked effective team management support and thus their metrics of group dynamics were miserable. Consequently, after the replacement of the entire management of the team, the group began to show Hyatt and Rudy’s traits - group progress. Therefore, effective team management facilitates effective communication within the group members and brings about satisfaction and security among group members for better productivity in an organization.

ReferenceAamodt, M. G. (2013) Industrial/organizational psychology.An applied approach. (7th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Hyatt, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (1997), An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breach. Personnel Psychology, 50(3)Energy and interactionGroup dynamics and defined by Marcellino (2006), is the energy and interaction generated through interconnection of groping more than one person together to attain certain goals.

A group has to meet various criterions that is, team members must consider themselves a unit, must attain some membership reward, consider group problems as their own problems and should have some shared goals or common interest. External dynamic dictates performance goals while internal dynamic dictates interactions and connections in a group. Communicating the goals of the group effectively and establishing such goals and is a crucial group dynamic aspect relevant in managing groups in an organization.

An organizational group, therefore, must understand their group objectives, available resources to strengthen the group efforts and definitive team’s milestones that a group should achieve. Group energy and interaction is crucial and enable a team to develop a sense of trust, identity to a group and common goals, (Fishbach, Henderson & Koo 2011). Positive group socialization and management support are crucial because they satisfy members’ higher order needs, for example, recognition, self-esteem, identity, and affection as they offer achieve these things via mutual interactions that are not achievable if people act individually.

Additionally, strong interactions and group energy influences people behavior in diverse ways in form of compliance with team norms, values, cohesiveness, conflict management, participation, and teamwork, (Pinto, Marques, Levine & Abrams, 2010). Therefore, without clearly defined and realistic group energy and means of interaction, even the most cohesive team cannot survive or meet group expectations. ReferencesAamodt, M. G. (2013) Industrial/organizational psychology.An applied approach. (7th ed).

Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Fishbach, A., Henderson, M. D., & Koo, M. (2011). Pursuing goals with others: Group identification and motivation resulting from things done versus things left undone. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 520-534. doi:10.1037/a0023907Marcellino, P. (2006). Group dynamics.In F. English (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational leadership and administration. (pp. 442-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M.

, & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 99(1), 107-119. doi:10.1037/a0018187