Project Implementation Process - Essay Example

?Topic: Project Implementation Process Introduction The project to be implemented involves the renovation of the piece of land offered to the school by the local council at a discount to develop and improve the dilapidated area in general. It is in the interest of the developer to see to the finishing of the project as required by the school, the local council and any other party interested in developing the property (Nohe, 2009, p. 11). A new sports centre is to be brought up in the place even though there still is interest for the building of residential flats in the same area to generate some income and offset some of the costs incurred in building by the selling of the commercial and residential units to the willing buyers from the public. It is also expected by the stakeholders that some commercial uses like an artists’ studio shall have a place on the piece of land after it is developed for the generation of further income by drawing more people to the site. It is thus the developer’s duty to assess the site and, in this report to the School Governors, detail how the various issues put forth by the stakeholders shall be handled to make sure that the 2.5 million pounds budgeted for meet all the needs of developing the project (Kerzner, 2009, p. 9). Statutory Issues in Consideration There are several legal matters that need to be dealt with to ensure a smooth running of operations both currently and in the future. It is expected of the developer that all matters legal are put into consideration to eliminate all hurdles that may sabotage the project and lead to the loss of the benefits expected from the projects that will result from the facilities erected on the bought site. These issues shall be discussed in the following section to quell the fears of the stakeholders and have their confidence and blessings as to the viability and profit potential of the project (Smock and Stewart, 2006, p. 30). The first issue is the legal access to the site that has been bought from the local authority. All the required documents concerning the transfer of land to the Drove Park School shall be obtained before the commencement of the project. The title deed shall be transferred to the Grove Park School before any activity is undertaken. It is expected that the complete transfer of the land from the local authority possessing it to the school shall be completed before the developer takes charge of the projects at hand. This is to avoid the eventualities that may result from the access to land that is under dispute due to one mishap or another (Russill, 2012, p. 41). Another legal issue that requires keen attention is the acquisition of the permit from the government to allow access to and development of the land in question. An agreement shall be signed between Grove Park School and all the authorities that have a vested interest in the land to fully assure the Grove Park School that it has the full possession of the site at hand and that its developer is allowed full access and the use of the land (Nohe, 2009, p. 22). The site needs to be developed from a very poor and hopeless state to inspire the whole area and turn it into a business center of its own standing. Since it is expected that the project shall be very successful, plans should be put in place both with the owners of the land adjacent to the one under development to eliminate any future hurdles that may jeopardize development and other plans. The Grove Park School should thus focus on liaising with the local authorities to allow future expansion plans without breaking any laws in place. All government rules concerning the future plans of the project at hand should be known in advance both by the developer and all parties with vested interest (Kerzner, 2009, p. 15). The developer at this stage assures all parties that all rules and regulations concerning the project both at present and in the future are well taken care of and there exists no major hurdle as to the development plans in place. Statutory Applications required for the Development of the Site The period for the project should be put under consideration first of all to determine how costs shall be spread throughout the days. It is in the interests of all the parties involved to know the period the project shall run to eliminate the duplication of duties and the incurring of unnecessary costs in the project implementation phases. For the developer, this allows the correct planning of their activities to eliminate time wastage (Dominick and Lunney, 2011, p. 56). The law requires that the time to be taken in working on the project be known and thus it should be. The developer, on his part, has all the resources at their disposal ready to commence work as soon as the stakeholders give word of a go-ahead. A second statutory application is that several parties shall report to one another concerning their share of the work at hand. The developer shall report to all stakeholders after every period that shall be agreed upon according to the period that shall be given for the development of the project (Stone, 2010, p. 45). This reporting serves to keep all parties with vested interest in the project in the loop on the goings-on of the project at hand. The developer shall also report to the local authorities in the cases where concerns are raised in regard to any part of the project before, during and after the project has come to completion. Another application of the statutory requirements of the project is the issue of changes in the implementation of the project. It is required by the law that the parties involved with the project take into consideration the eventualities that may come out of the project. This ensures that in the case of anything, there is a party to be held responsible for the cost that may be incurred in dealing with the emergent anomaly (Russill, 2012, p. 60). The parties at hand, being the developer and the stakeholders, shall enter an agreement as to who shall foot the bills of the eventualities and the unseen risks during the implementation of the project. The developer agrees to meet the costs of the eventualities with the condition that he shall be compensated at the end of the project implementation period. To this effect, an amount shall be set by the developer beyond which the stakeholders shall be required to step in to fund the emergency (Smock and Stewart, 2006, p. 88). This change in project implementation basically means that there shall be a change in the initially-accepted commitments as initially agreed upon by the parties which, as stated above, consist of the developer and the various stakeholders. Rules are to be put into place to clearly state what will occur in the case there are changes to the plans put into place for the implementation of the project. It is the developer’s delight to inform the governors of the Grove Park School that all plans are in place to take care of the eventualities that may occur due to the activities that are not planned for (Kerzner, 2009, p. 43). The developer assures the stakeholders of his flexibility and quickness in adapting to changes without much need for structural adjustments. Implications of Land Contamination The land the grove Park School has acquired is greatly contaminated by the various pollution agents and the activities of man. Following the failure of the two businesses that were on site (the metal fabrication company and the car maintenance workshop ‘Windmill Motors’), the area was abandoned and left to the fly-tippers and the other activities that only served to depreciate the land further. No wonder it had lacked a buyer before Grove Park got a better deal on the land than the rest of the interested parties due to its poor state (Taylor, 2007, p. 77). First of all, there is the aspect of the site being used as a dumping site due it being abandoned. Without security or any parties interested in the buying of the site, many people tend to treat the area with contempt and hence they use it as a place throw wastes from many places. With such kind of activities having taken place, it is expected that a lot of work needs to be done to bring the site to humane conditions and allow the existent of human lives that are free of diseases and other environmental shortcomings (Russill, 2012, p. 87). Another area of note is that it has a watercourse, the Wendle, which is silted and polluted due to the poor conditions of the area and the fact that it is an abandoned site. There are also the remains of a mid-19th century windmill which serves as a reminder of the rural past of the area. This windmill’s remains have been turned into a store for scrap metal and basically rendered the windmill unusable without a great effort at renovating it. This paints a grim picture of the area as bought by the Grove Park School (Smock and Stewart, 2006, p. 102). One reason most potential buyers to the land refused to take up the deal was the fact that the renovation costs would be too much and realizing a profit from the land would take many years to materialize. Since the Grove Park School acquired the land at a discount, the deal makes sense since it would take less time to have things running and the land being profitable. The available resources on this piece of land are mostly few with poorly developed water systems and polluted water. The resources therefore are in conditions that cannot be easily restored to their natural states and be used for their intended natural purposes. The importance of the knowledge availed by this recap is that it is possible to cut costs by, instead of building a new windmill, renovating the old one to serve the intended purpose. With the Wendle, efforts and resources could be channeled towards cleaning it up so that it provides water to the residential units that shall be availed by the project at hand (Taylor, 2006, p. 45). The developer assures the stakeholders in general of the ability to see to the above-stated tasks with the efficiency and effectiveness that shall save on costs besides ensuring high quality work for the working of the project and its end results. High quality work is thus guaranteed by the developer to the project. Pursuing a Green Agenda The Grove Park School is interested in developing an environment that is sustainable and one that does not pollute the environment in which people live. It is cheaper also in the sense that more affordable materials are used as opposed to the conventional way of erecting buildings and building the environment in general (Kerzner, 2009, p. 66). A green agenda environment is self-sustaining and provides conditions that are conducive to mankind. It should thus be known that the developer has the capabilities required to develop the required environment according to the needs of the green agenda program. The developer follows the current trends in the building and construction industry with the aim that the emerging technologies are well mastered and incorporated into their work to give quality work that does not get easily passed by the times. The statutory requirements to be considered for the green agenda project are basically those that require that certain conditions are met in protecting the environment. One such requirement is that which requires that wastes are reduced as much as possible. In the case of the project at hand, there exists waste reduction at different levels. First of all is that the developer should make it their own responsibility to emit as little gaseous wastes as possible during the construction phase. The other point on waste management is that the wastes on the site need to be disposed off properly to eliminate the spread of diseases or any other factors that may cause harm to human life. The third point on waste reduction is that those who shall live on the premises that shall be required to adhere to rules and regulations as decided upon by the various types of stakeholders like the landlord and government (Stone, 2010, p. 100). The sustainability framework for schools as laid down by the government encompasses eight ‘doorways’ for the schools to either begin to extend their sustainable school activities. The ‘doorways’ are travel and traffic; local wellbeing; food and drink; purchasing and waste; energy and water; buildings and grounds; inclusion and participation and, lastly, the global citizenship. The school has the options to decide how it is to go about deciding what way it sees best to go about handling the ‘doorway.’ They have a choice between dealing with each ‘doorway’ individually or tackling and adopting them together as a whole system (Nohe, 2009, p. 100). The end result of adopting the ‘doorways’ stated above is that the school will see to the improvement of its curriculum, school environment and the relationship it shall have with the local community. The developer shall offer the required expertise to ensure the plans laid down b the school and other stakeholders are successfully implemented. Another point in the favor of the green agenda program is the fact that the project at hand involves a school as a major player in the operations going on. The advantage stems from the idea that schools are the models for sustainability within any local communities. Schools integrating the green agenda are deemed to increase in reputation and attract more students and enter into more local partnerships. There usually are financial benefits for the Grove Park School if it engages in the green agenda program. The statutory consideration in place is that the government favors the development and adoption of green technology to reduce the effects of several factors with negative effects on the environment (Walker and Hampson, 2008, p. 89). The efforts by the Grove Park School would thus be recognized and rewarded. The stakeholders should know of the willingness of the developer in adapting to the changes that shall be decided upon. The Windmill The windmill makes a major part of the available property on the land that be acquired by the Grove Park School. Procurement shall be done to take care of the activities that involve this windmill before more funds are laid within reach to renovate the windmill and derive energy from it. The several procurement methods include the traditional procurement method where the contractor undertakes the building of the defined scope of works for a given and fixed price lump sum. In this procurement method, the client retains the responsibility for the project team and the design of the structure to be built (Walker and Hampson, 2008, p. 97). The contractors are appointed normally after a tender processor a negotiation and will then sign up to a contract to undertake the work. The second procurement method is the design and build procurement method which involves the appointing of a building contractor by the client before the standard forms of contract are made available for the same purpose to provide a completed building at an agreed upon cost and program. In this method, the contractor is responsible for the design and construction of whatever structure is to be built. Here also, the contractor can either be chosen through a tender or through a negotiation process. A consultant can be appointed by the client to oversee the goings on at the place of work. The maximum risk at hand is transferred following this method of procurement, even though a commercial response to design in order to address the conditions of the contract can result (Taylor, 2007, p. 100). The third procurement method is the two stage tender procurement which involves the hiring of the contractor on the basis of a first stage tender which mostly determines the levels of profit and overhead for each contract. The best procurement method in this case is the Two Stage Tender Procurement method due to its flexibility in allowing the contractee enough time to find capital before the second stage if reached. As the developer for this project, the windmill shall be renovated eventually to provide the required energy to the houses and other pieces of property on the piece of land. This is the better option since it is cheaper than having to erect a new windmill from the ground up (Burwick, 2008, p. 99). The Buildings There have been concerns from the stakeholders that the buildings to be erected will most likely be higher than the other buildings in the area and would most likely cause a reduction in ambient light especially in the residential units nearby. There is also another concern that the buildings may be too close to the others already in the area. The two issues expressed by the stakeholders hold a potential conflict with the would-be neighbors who would most likely complain if the buildings are set this way (Walker and Rowlinson, 2007, p. 100). As the developer to this project, it is an utmost aim that these two hurdles should be dealt with even before commencement of the projects. As for the height of the buildings, the residents shall be made aware of the fact that the blockage of light shall only occur during a few hours in the day then everything will go back to normal after that. Should it be proved that there could be a blockage of light for longer than normal, the height of the buildings could be reduced a bit to allow for the flow of natural light. Considering the distances between the buildings which are feared to be most likely too short, the parts of the buildings that shall be adjacent to the other buildings shall be the parts that are not used in the normal way of operation. These include the side walls of buildings that lack both doors and windows especially for the residential units (Walker and Rowlinson, 2007, p. 106). Conclusion In conclusion, all the parties with vested interests in this project should be aware of the fact that the developer is in full control of the situation and therefore the project should commence as desired. The fears expressed by the team that makes up the School Governors have been surely quelled by the issues addressed by this paper in the few paragraphs preceding the present one. It is thus with confidence that the contractor urges the teams involved with the plan to go ahead and commence the activities required to see to the start of the project (Blokdijk, 2008, p. 87). References Blokdijk, G., 2008. Business Process Management Bpm 100 Success Secrets: 100 Most Asked Questions on Bpm Implementation, Process, Software, Tools and Solutions. London: Lulu.com. Burwick, D., 2008. How to Implement the CMMI: Real Process Improvement Using Proven Solutions. Chicago: Business Process Solutions. Dominick, C. and Lunney, S., 2011. The Procurement Game Plan: Winning Strategies and Techniques for Supply Management Professionals. New York: J. Ross Publishing, Incorporated. Kerzner, H., 2009. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Nohe, M., 2009. Implementation of Quality Control Measures in Project Management and Its Impact on Customer Satisfaction. Chicago: GRIN Verlag. Russill, R., 2012. A Short Guide to Procurement Risk (Ebk - Epub). Chicago: Gower Publishing, Ltd. Smock, D. and Stewart, S., 2006. Straight to the Bottom Line. Chicago: J. Ross Publishing. Stone, T., 2010. Managing the Design Process: Implementing Design: An Essential Manual for the Working Designer. Chicago: Rockport Publishers. Taylor, J., 2007. Project Scheduling and Cost Control: Planning, Monitoring and Controlling the Baseline. New York: J. Ross Publishing. Taylor, J., 2006. A survival guide for project managers. New York: AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Walker, D. and Hampson, K., 2008. Procurement Strategies: A Relationship-based Approach. Chicago: Wiley. Walker, D. and Rowlinson, S., 2007. Procurement Systems: A Cross-Industry Project Management Perspective. New York: Taylor & Francis. Read More