Nobody downloaded yet

Sustainability: Aesthetic, but Not Necesarily Practical in Ultra-modern Architecture - Term Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Your Name Date Sustainability: aesthetic, but not necessarily practical in ultra-modern architecture Architecture must always bend to a great number of different forces. Most of these are forces of practicality – certain technologies are available, certain are not, some materials are able to hold up to certain strains, and others are not…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
Sustainability: Aesthetic, but Not Necesarily Practical in Ultra-modern Architecture
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Sustainability: Aesthetic, but Not Necesarily Practical in Ultra-modern Architecture"

Download file to see previous pages But a closer analysis of the trends of architecture reveals that these are not actually the forces that are driving growing sustainability within architecture, especially in large scale projects. Though there could be significant changes and advances in sustainable architecture, that would actually improve the energy efficiency of buildings, or lead to them being constructed in more sustainable ways or with more sustainable materials, this is not the trend that is occurring. Rather, sustainability is being used aesthetically, often tacked on to buildings and projects in the most ostentatious way possible, in able to demonstrate sustainability in an aesthetically pleasing and visible way, regardless of the actual sustainability benefits involved. This is not to argue that necessarily that these initiatives are not sustainable or do not generate results, but that these results are less important in building design than their aesthetic. We find the aesthetics of sustainability appealing, and this is the major force behind growing sustainability, not the actual benefits of the sustainable architecture. ...
These walls are common across university campuses and many other places, and have been for centuries. A modern green wall, however, is quite a different thing. These usually have complex structures of water and soil that are made to allow a wide variety of plants to survive and thrive.2 These walls are said to have a wide variety of benefits to the area that they are integrated to. The most obvious of these is that they produce oxygen, which is supposed to add to air quality as well as helping productivity, because people are able to think better in more oxygenated environments (as well as being more wakeful in environments with low amounts of carbon dioxide).3 Furthermore, they have been demonstrated to help control temperature, which can have a benefit on energy cost in warmer areas.4 Beyond all of these benefits, they also have the obvious sustainability benefit of helping to reduce the carbon dioxide, slowing global warming and adding to sustainability in a world-wide, ecologically conscious and long-term way. The issue is, however, that the benefits of these walls in terms of sustainability might not be that significant as compared to their cost. Though they save on electricity via the savings of cooling cost in warmer climes through a reduction in temperature, they also have significant electricity costs. A proper living wall requires pumps for water to keep the plants hydrated, along with constant light, usually from artificial sources such as incandescent lighting. Few studies have been done on these cost-benefit of electricity usage in this wall, but the fact remains that it could not have been significantly beneficial, given all of those costs. This begs the question of why to put these walls in place. The biggest advantage of them is ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Sustainability: Aesthetic, but Not Necesarily Practical in Term Paper”, n.d.)
Sustainability: Aesthetic, but Not Necesarily Practical in Term Paper. Retrieved from
(Sustainability: Aesthetic, But Not Necesarily Practical in Term Paper)
Sustainability: Aesthetic, But Not Necesarily Practical in Term Paper.
“Sustainability: Aesthetic, But Not Necesarily Practical in Term Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Sustainability: Aesthetic, but Not Necesarily Practical in Ultra-modern Architecture

Modern Architecture and Modernity

...?Buckminster Fuller and Oscar Niemeyer: Modernist Architecture Based on the Theme of Progress Introduction The concepts of progress, change and novelty form the core of modernism in architecture. “The aesthetic concepts of modernity and the avant-garde were conceived within a general notion of progress” (Hvattum & Hermansen 2004: 30). This forms the logic of history in which new technical and scientific innovations have facilitated change. Modernism in architecture takes into account three key epistemological positions: history, theology, and politics, with progress as an underlying characteristic of these concepts....
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Sustainability. How to improve sustainability

...the sustainability agenda. This calls for planning and evaluation of energy consumption and utilisation based on renewable and non-renewable resources (Stapleton and Garrod, 2008, p. 499). The City Hall in London is located in the City Hall Park on the south bank of river Thames. It is a modern building that displays creativity, aesthetic and sustainable tendencies. The City Hall building is a 10-storey building that stands at 45m. The building comprises a public gallery, assembly chamber, committee rooms, offices and restaurants. The building is accessible and transparent hence people can examine its architecture and suitability. It is equally...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Modern Architecture in Australia

... Modern Architecture in Australia Generally, Australian architecture has shown consistency with architectural trends in the wider western world. However, there are some special adaptations and distinctive features that compensate for Australian climatic and cultural factors. In the 18th century, indigenous Australians only built semi-permanent structures. Following the period of European settlement and absence of evidence of permanent structures built, Australia’s early western history architectural styles were influenced by British designs since it was under British colonial rule. However, Australia’s distinctive and unique climate necessitated adaptations in the architectural designs. Notable Australian adaptations include... history was...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Aesthetic relativism versus aesthetic objectivism

...Aesthetic Relativism versus Aesthetic Objectivism. The notion of anesthetic was introduced in the eighteenth century, and the term aesthetic has now become used to designate things like, kind of object, kind of experience, kind of judgment as well as a kind of value. In general, theories of aesthetic have divided over queries specific to forms of designations: whether works of arts are necessarily aesthetic objects and how to square the purportedly basis of judgments of aesthetic with the fact that reason is given in support. In addition, what is the best way to capture the elusive difference between an aesthetic...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Modern Architecture the 20th century is Modern architecture. Modern architecture can be best described as a style which believes that "Less is more". The major proponent of this style is Ludwig Mies van der Rohe which thought of the "Less is more" theme for modern architecture. Modern architecture is known for its rejection of the classical styles (historicism) and believes that the materials and functions of the objects used in the structure is the end all and be all of the structure. It also firmly applies the principle of industrial aesthetic and the concept of functionality over being...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Modern Retail Architecture the one that is relative to the open mall concept that is modern in its structure and occupying more space. International retailers have rated the open mall concept as the most preferred mall design, simple, sleek and nothing more. The theme is practicality in running the stores in line with budget designs, marketing, and costing items. Deliberately costing of items comes on top with the list of priorities. Globalization has lowered the concept of interior designing and fashion in a sense that these open mall concept have been deliberately denying the glory of creating ingenious architecture against the discounting and bargaining features of their items as platforms for budget...
32 Pages(8000 words)Coursework

Modern and Postmodern Architecture

...diverse aesthetics; styles collide, form is adopted for its own sake, and new ways of viewing familiar styles and space abound." Modernist architects view postmodernism as "vulgar and loaded with 'gee-gaws'" however post modernist architects see modern architecture as "soulless and bland." Modernism is originated mostly from the quantity of elements and cost of a structure whereas post-modernism "seeks exuberance in the use of building techniques, angles, references." Within every style, there is a purpose, a goal a reason. The brain of international style architecture is that it adhere the sincerity of modernism yet...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Modern Architecture

...repelling the people. The slab shape of the Towers and their isolation grew out of an aesthetic voiced best by Le Corbusier, who said that in order to have modern planning we have to ‘kill the streets.’ For him the street epitomized disorder and chaos” (Berman, 2002). By contrast, the Battery Park City Complex was also designed by the Port Authority in much the same way as the World Trade Center, yet was much more user friendly in that it had parks, museums, restaurants and other amenities that invited people to come in and stay awhile. Although the city is perceived as a melting pot of various cultures, people, ideas, practices and numerous other concepts, Berman points out that it...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

History of Modern Architecture

...History of Modern Architecture: The designing and building of Farnsworth were between 1945 and 1951.The person who designed the Dr.Edith Farnsworth. On the other hand, Johnson’s house also known as the glass house was built in 1949.I house was designed by Johnson in 1949. Contrary to Dr.Farnsworth reason for designing the house, the house was purposely designed and built by the architecture as his place of residence. Differences between Johnson House and Farnsworth House According to the design of Johnson’s house, sits directly on the land. This is quite different from Dr.Edith Farnsworth’s house that is raised above the ground. Another difference between the houses is on the painting....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

History of Modern Architecture

...seeking meaning and expression various architectural techniques, styles, forms. In order to meet with the aims, the postmodern architecture had to reject the strict rules of the modernism movement. On the other hand the modern structures were purely based on a thrifty use of material and other aspects of postmodern architectures like ornamentation, were absent (Curtis, 1987). The functionalism of modernism movement was dull and unattractive. It compelled the postmodern architects to focus on the communicating meaning; therefore, they start quoting historic traditions of architecture and merging it with...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Sustainability: Aesthetic, but Not Necesarily Practical in Ultra-modern Architecture for FREE!

Contact Us