Download file to see previous pages...
At the same time, I applied the piecemeal approach which involves reading key sections of the paper and skimming the figures first.
There is a lot of information about Australopithecus sediba among other pre-humans in the scientific article while the press articles emphasized on the key features of the fossils. The two press articles are like a summary of the scientific article written in a more-easy-to understand language. The science article also has details like the actual size of the various parts of the fossil while such information is omitted in the press articles.
The methodologies of the study are explained in details in the scientific article while using scientific terminologies that ordinary people find difficult to understand. The press articles have not described the methodology applied while conducting the study because the reporters were targeting ordinary people who might have very little or no understanding of the scientific terminologies used to describe scientific methodologies. The methodologies described in the scientific article confirm that the study is reliable and that the findings made are accurate.
The scientific paper is more detailed compared to the two press articles. The scientific article had background information like the relationship between Australopithecus sediba and other pre-humans such as the Australopithecus Africanus while the press articles focused on the Australopithecus sediba alone. Opinions of the researchers that are beyond the findings made are left out in the scientific paper while in-depth scientific details such as the scientific methodologies applied during the research were left out in the press articles.
Some of the comments are in the press articles are supporting the argument raised and further elaborating the topic at hand while others are criticizing the argument. For instance, some people argue
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The discovery of the two partial skeletons of a hitherto unclassified species of hominid, called Australopithecus sediba from a cave at Malapa site in South Africa is a unique find in the sense that it extends much missing information as to the physical evolution of Homo sapiens.
running head: mid-term questions Mid-term Questions Submitted to: Student’s Name [Pick the date] Question 1 There are four subfields of anthropology that include cultural, biological, linguistic and archeological anthropology (Harris, 1997). While discussing any anthropological area, it is important to note that culture acts as the gist of all human activities.
Note: Assignments sent via post mail should include a Tutor-Marked Exercise Form.
Explain The DNA is supposed to bond to the complementary base and these are not available in the options. The correct answer would (CCG AUU UCC UUA GCA
The film provides vignettes that are both exploratory and provocative.
It follows the characteristics that make up modern human beings. It starts with Australopithecus Afarensis to the contemporary Homo
He had limbs similar to the modern man but quiet thicker in size. Homo erectus used stone tools such as flakes and choppers. The Neanderthal man had body structure which was slightly different from both the Homo erectus and Homo sapiens. The species’ bodies were
Chimpanzee and Paranthropus had strong jaws sizes that were relatively similar in size. However, differences existed in the structuring of the cranium and dentition. The cranium of the Paranthropus was relatively higher as compared to the one for chimpanzees. The
The researchers were to base their re-examination on assemblage of manual elements sampled from Hadar, Ethiopia.
According to Rolian and Gordon (2013), the foundation for the conclusions was assemblage of A.L.
The reason is that during the days of early man, the environment remained intact. There was no form of pollution like there is today. Additionally, human beings were great friends of their surroundings since it served as their home. However, the evolution of man has brought drastic changes to the environment.
The changes in the skeletal structure include alterations of the femur and the pelvic region for adequate support of the upper body weight. The big toe of the feet also becomes aligned with the other toes to enable the primates to
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Australopithecus sediba for FREE!