The Human Tree There is debate whether man’s direct ancestor is Australopithicus Afarensis or Ramidus, because there is not enough evidence to be certain if Afarensis was in a direct line or a secondary line from Ramidus. In either case the hominid line certainly descended from one or the other or both…
Download file to see previous pages...
This space was small and at the rear of the skull in quadrapedal animals. It moved a little forward and grew to about 6 times the earlier one for knuckle walkers, like gorillas. For bipedal animals it moved even further forward and nearly doubles in size. This makes sense, as the place where the spinal column enters the skull would govern the angle at which the head is carried (Howells 77-205). Lucy from Oldivai Gorge in South Africa is the most complete skeleton of this genus, which walked upright and may have used very simple tools. It probably lived in trees, but hunted or scavenged on the ground, as the curvature of fingers and toes indicates it could climb trees. The pelvis in the female is the same as modern man. The long forehead slopes at about 45 degrees from the bony ridge over the eyes, and there is no real chin. Two sets of footprints preserved by volcanic action and found by Mary Leakey show human toes, and they prove that Australopithecus Afarensis walked on two feet habitually, though the placement of feet show a more splayed gait and suggests that this ape was not quite upright ("Early Human Evolution: Early Transitional Humans."). One of the difficulties with the fossil records is that there is no way of knowing how many species exhibiting changes came between one recovered fossil and the next. This is why there is disagreement about exactly where the branches might be. Without DNA evidence it is not possible to know for sure which hominid is the ancestor of which others. Even with DNA evidence it would not be certain, as it would requires some from all the fossils in the line. Australopithecus Africanus followed next. However, it is not certain where homo branched off. It could have been from Aferensis, Africanus, Robustus or even a separate Paranthropus Robustus. All of these were inhabiting the same area as contemporaries. There might even have been interbreeding, which would indicate that the breeds were not really separate. The Robustus definitely had larger bones and brain cavity, and it seems to have gone extinct. That leaves either Afarensis or Africanus as being separate lines or branching to Australopithecus Bahrelghazali which then branched to Homo. Only lower jaw bones have been found thus far, but the dentition puts this species closer to Homo than the others. There may have been other branches of Australopithecus, but there is not enough fossil evidence that they were around very long before going extinct. Cross breeding could also have eliminated some differences ("Hominidae_filogenia.png (PNG Image, 1025 ? 979 pixels)."). So me theorists eliminate all of these australopithecines from the homo line of ancestry, believing that homo lines branched off independently from either Ardipithecus Ramidus or A. Garhi. However, one might question this based upon the lack of fossils and the latest find in Georgia on the Black Sea of five Homo Habilis types with a great deal of variation among them. It is possible they are all one species with variation, just as we have today. Speciation generally includes an inability to procreate successfully between species. A recent discovery of what seems to be a new species of Australopithecus, A. Garhi, in Ethiopia is a candidate for early human. This illustration shows the pitifully few pieces that have been found, and the Georgian discovery makes it worth further investigation before ascribing
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Final questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1497446-final-questions
(Final Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Final Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/anthropology/1497446-final-questions.
This was the case with Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D. Roosevelt (Griffin and Hines, 2008). Again, given that the presidency is the number one position in the nation, the president is the first person to be apportioned praise if the there is prosperity and relative peace.
Constitution for each generation while Thomas Jefferson contemporary, James Madison, argued that the U.S. Constitution should provide stability from one generation to the next (Vile, 1991). Both founding fathers have reasons for their proposals and people have taken sides on the issue.
Death penalty is an old idea as it dates back to 1700 BC where Code of Hammurabi has contained the first known death penalty laws. Under this law, around twenty five crimes were treated as punishable by death penalty (Guernsey, 2009, p. 9). Both Bible and Quran have set down rules of law considering death penalty as a punishment for one who takes a life.
Fixed costs are those expenditures which remains constant over a certain level of activity. For example rent for a factory. Variable cost on the other hand varies in accordance to changes in the level of activity. A common example is labor.
However, as time goes by and the organisation develops, it is common for them to practice automation, which is "the substitution of automatic methods for human labor."1 This leads to redundancy as human output is replaced by machinery.
The colonialists were awarded the rights to control the appointments of clerics in these newly discovered regions. In fact, direct contact between the clerics and Vatican was prohibited, thereby giving states express authority over the church. This kind of control did not go
Jefferson, as the governor of Virginia, ordered the moving of the tribes that fought on the British side to the west of the Mississippi River. Jefferson believed that Native American should give up their culture and beliefs to blend in with the Western Europe
opologists and socialists have tried to come up with ways that could show that we are all the same in the eyes of the Lord, stating the creation theory and related norms that tries to explain that mankind came from a single parent.
Gays and lesbianism: this issue also is on the