Nobody downloaded yet

Agreed-Upon Values that Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The reporter describes Twelve Angry Men with Jack Lemmon as a film about twelve jurors who have been given the responsibility of deciding the fate of18-year-old boy who has been charged with the murder of his father…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91% of users find it useful
Agreed-Upon Values that Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Agreed-Upon Values that Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men"

Download file to see previous pages The team unanimously believes in this value and for that reason, it does share one aspect of a high performing team. It is expected that the team would perform well because all members agree that if the boy has committed the murder of his father, then he should be punished. However, the jury in order to punish the offender has to reach a unanimous decision. The vote of all the jurors should be either in favor or in disfavor of the death sentence. As a team, they need to reach one decision.
Yes. The team does have a clear and attainable goal. The goal is to reach a vote where the tally is 9-0 and for this, they fight the entire story. For well-performing teams to function efficiently, they need to have the same vision and goal.
While the vision of the team is the same and that is to reach the right decision. However, the team it seems is prejudiced from the beginning. Were it not for the case of reasonable doubt raised by Juror 8, the whole team would have reached the wrong decision. Hence the conflict raised by Juror 8 allowed the team to perform their duty with more responsibility and care. Otherwise, they would have reached the conclusion of awarding the boy a death sentence based on his background.
The team does not have the skills and willingness to deal with the situation. They were ordinary members of the society and they have probably never given jury duty before. Most of them are also not willing to deal with the conflict. They want to reach the verdict as soon as possible because they want to resume their own normal life after the verdict.
Because of the conflict created by Juror 8, the team members are quite willing to speak their mind. They openly criticize each other and at one point they even resort to personal criticism. They openly discussed the case and even play-acted the situation. However, this is unusual as the team had been formed for a short period of time. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Agreed-Upon Values that Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men Essay - 1”, n.d.)
Agreed-Upon Values that Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men Essay - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/visual-arts-film-studies/1803453-final-exam
(Agreed-Upon Values That Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men Essay - 1)
Agreed-Upon Values That Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men Essay - 1. https://studentshare.org/visual-arts-film-studies/1803453-final-exam.
“Agreed-Upon Values That Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men Essay - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/visual-arts-film-studies/1803453-final-exam.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Agreed-Upon Values that Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men: Negotiation Techniques Employed

...? Twelve Angry Men: Negotiation Techniques Employed Twelve Angry Men: Negotiation Techniques Employed Character Listing Juror is played by Martin Balsam. He is the foreman of the jury, and is extremely even-tempered and willing to listen to the evidence. He is also very polite. Juror #2 is played by John Fiedler. The best description for this man is nebbish. He seems very bookish and is very meek. Juror #3 is played by Lee Cobb. He is arguably the second most important character, behind Juror #8. He is hot-tempered and loud, and his temper is also extremely quick. He is very angry. He is, more than any of the jurors,...
13 Pages(3250 words)Term Paper

The film: Twelve Angry Men

...prejudices. Personally, it would be a tremendous weight to bear to serve on a jury in charge of deciding whether someone lives or dies. Knowing that this person’s fate depends on whether one can correctly interpret the evidence is no easy job. However, after seeing the film Twelve Angry Men, I realize that the worst-case scenario is that the jury room is filled with prejudiced, biased individuals who, despite how clear the evidence is, will always choose the wrong course of action. For that reason, I feel as though I have a duty to prevent that worst-case scenario and to provide the kind of rational criticism that juror number eight provides in the film. If called...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Twelve Angry Men

...?570323 12 Angry Men Order At the beginning of the movie, Twelve Angry Men, a juror of twelve men are assembled to decide the death penalty case of ayoung Latino man who is being prosecuted for killing his father. The story is not really about the defendant though. It is about the group dynamics of the jury and how they change throughout the movie. To start with, the group comes from a wide range of backgrounds and beliefs, but what is more important is how they view the purpose of their task. Most want to just “get it over with” regardless of the outcome. Because it does not affect their lives in any...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Twelve Angry Men Analysis Paper

... Twelve Angry Men Analyses Synopsis of the movie Twelve Angry Men (1957), is an iconic film originally written as a playby Reginald rose and adapted as a TV drama in 1957. Sidney Lumet directed the movie in 1957. This is a fascinating, piercing, and enthralling examination of a varied group of twelve male jurors who are generally middle-aged, white, and mostly from a middle-class background. They are uneasily brought together to deliberate after the trial and hearing of 'facts' in an apparently open-and-shut murder trial case. They withdraw to a jury room to perform their civic duty to provide a just verdict for the indigent 19-year-old minority defendant with a criminal record and whose fate is uncertain. At the start... of their...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Twelve Angry Men: Factors in Decision

... up with a credible decision among the jury. Jury is referred to as a group of randomly-selected citizens who have been invited for the hearing of a case in their own area. Their function is to study the case and make a decision with regards to the evidences gathered, guided by the rules of the law (Legal Explanation 2007). In the critically acclaimed 1957 movie, Twelve Angry Men, the life of the accused, an 18-year-old male who allegedly stabbed his father, greatly relies upon the decision of the jury. The movie implies that if Juror number 8 hadn't shown leadership skill, the boy will most likely be sentenced to death in just one trial. Poor juristical performance is seen among the rest of eleven jurors as they just decided... ...
4 Pages(1000 words)Movie Review

12 angry men movie

... 16 Feb. 2008 12 Angry Men The film “12 Angry Men” is a critically acclaimed film directed by first time director Sidney Lumet and released in the year 1957. The film is about the court trial of an 18 year old Spanish-American boy who is accused of murdering his father. A jury consisting of 12 men is assigned the job of looking into the case. It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three minutes in the washroom. The movie for nominated for three Oscars(Best Director, Best Picture and Best Writing, screenplay based on material from another medium... ) and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Twelve Angry Men

...Twelve Angry Men Introduction “Twelve Angry Men” is a film that falls under the genre of American drama film and was released in the year 1957. A teleplay bearing the same title was adapted which casted Reginald Rose. The film “Twelve Angry Men” was directed by Sidney Lumet. The film encapsulates a story that revolves round a jury comprised of twelve men who render the judgement to the person who is guilty and acquitted of a defendant based on some reasonable grounds. The film is also remarkable for the continuity and exclusive use of a single set. Also...
2 Pages(500 words)Movie Review

12 Angry Men (1957) -

...Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx 4 November 12 Angry Men The movie ‘12 Angry Men’ is a ic example of how a person’s strong conviction can enter hearts of others and make them think with a different outlook. The movie begins with the judge asking the jury to retire in the other room and come up with a decision. Eleven out of twelve jury members are in staunch support of the accused being given capital punishment. But there is one person who has ‘reasonable doubts’ in his mind about the evidences and the witnesses. He decides to vote not guilty for the accused and starts to give the logic behind his thinking. What happens after that is nothing less than...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 angry men

...12 Angry Men The movie “12 Angry Men” is an archetypal courtroom movie featuring twelve jurors and a defendant, accused of murder. The movie depicts the jury as the core and integral part of the criminal justice system. In the movie, one of the jurors is of a dissenting opinion and passionately attempt to free the accused. He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused. The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the case reaches the jury, the majority of the 12-member jury has no doubt that the accused committed...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

12 Angry Men

...Group process in the film “12 angry men” The jury deliberation in the film, “12 angry men” is a portrayal of group dynamics. Group dynamics relates to the functioning, structure and the roles individuals play in a group. The jury in the film, consisting of twelve men, was drawn together to determine whether the boy was culpable of killing his father. The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the coldly analytical juror number four to the bigotry...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Agreed-Upon Values that Are Lived by the Team in Twelve Angry Men for FREE!

Contact Us