Dont Kill the Rooster - Essay Example

Comedy has a wider range. The natures to presentation vary and judgment is done based on the audience reception. The audience may be deceiving as O'Shannon (P. 19) indicates that laugher does not necessarily determine the quality provided for by comedy. The details that matter in comedy dwell majorly on the author and the audience. The reception by the audience and nature of presentation is what determine s the quality of any given piece of presentation. The audience need to read across the authors ideas and should be able t relate to them. The essay will focus on a short comedy by David Sedaris ‘You Can't Kill the Rooster’. The story gives an overview of two generations that have conflicting interests. The society expectations are kept under the test as the conversation between Sedaris and his brother. The writer uses a family set up to develop his comedy. Most people may consider his work as offensive due to the nature of language being used. The abusive words may limit the number of audience willing to listen to the joke. It describes the manner which a single vocabulary may mean differently across the age. The manner of presentation by the author may call for viewer discretion. On the other hand those who are familiar with the terms may find the work funny taking less offense from the entire work. Nature provides room for divided opinions. A decision is made at different levels. The laughter that will be experienced after reading the piece may indicate the levels of acceptance. The target audience expects a unique characteristic of what the piece being presented with the delivery of the work being left for them to judge whether it meets the desired standards. The offensive part of the comedy may be a temporary aspect as many may choose to adapt to the comedy. The title of the comedy makes the story to be comic. The title is ironic in nature hence the funny aspect appears in the title. The expectation of the reader may be lowered while reading the entire story where the structure changes to give room for a more complex approach the author. The story line provides the writer to read a long his thought but differences may occur when a reader consider words used by his brother to be offensive. The writer’s choice to use offensive words is acceptable. O'Shannon describes the class of comedy to insult humor. The tool according to him plays part in gaining a larger number of audiences. The groups that feel offended may be disapproval of the approach but the remaining population may find humor in the presentation. They then create the need audience by the author to develop his story line without the fear or rejection. The strategy incurs a sacrificial approach where the author risks offending some people with the abusive words but aiming at presenting his work in an open platform. The nature of presentation may differ but the major concerns by the audience will be on the content with less interest being focused to the offensive nature of the comedy. The offensive approaches the author uses may be unacceptable to some audience but stills remain a tool in comedy. The approach adopts a scenario where the some interests must be sacrificed to give room for the rest to play along with the writer’s strategy. Author choose their audiences effects and from the work by Sedaris. It is evident his preferred audience is the youth population. They take less offense on terminologies used by the writer in presenting his piece of art. The trend allows offensive language to be used as an important aspect in comedy. The rest of population may have a mixed reaction on the content relayed by the poem. The rest will be content in the details of the comedy and will adjust appropriately to features related to comic representation. The critics play part in ensuring the literature work advances in many angles. The remaining population that is opposed to the piece by Sedaris will opt to seek alternative pieces. The choice will be made upon them listening and reading through the comedy first. An open piece of comedy that gives room for security is what Sedaris provides t his listener. Generational change is what the author of the comic piece displays. He compares his youth ages and uses comic effect to compare it with what his brother is experiencing. The inclusion of his father who feels less offended by the terms used by his brother to signify the acceptance levels of the terminologies used by his brother. The effect is expected to passed on to his audiences where he expects them to adjust t his piece of comedy the same way his parents adapted to his brothers terms. The majority of the population will find the piece funny ignoring the offensive part but dwelling majorly on the story line provided by the writer. The content describes how generational change affects the nature of communication as well as thinking ability. The replication of the same in comedy is what Sedaris use effectively as he drives the audience away from the traditional ways of comedy that majorly involved satire and create a sense of humor that is unique. Judgment on whether he achieves in making the piece funny will lie majorly on the audience. In conclusion the author achieves each aspect of comedy. He creates a story line that the audience needed to follow to realize his line of comedy. The humor aspect of the piece is created by the use of the abusive language. The inclusion of his father in the conversation develops the humor more. The offensive language used by the writer may be rejected by a majority of the audiences some terming the approach as less comic. The aspect gives the piece a credible feature that allows room for scrutiny. A piece of comedy creates two aspects that dwells on the author who provides the content and the audience who receive the piece of art and offers feedback. Work cited O’Shannon, Dan. What Are You Laughing At? A Comprehensive Guide to the Comedic Event. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2012. Print. Read More