Exhibition/Programming Catalogue - Essay Example

Film Programming Catalogue This catalogue is deemed to attract a large audience that will attend a showcasing of Australian films. Since they are made in Australia, the exhibition seeks to attract an relatively large crowd of Australians. Many people have a liking for goods that are given ample description before the actual purchase. Therefore, this would be a better drill to the market as many people will be attracted to the films. In addition to this, the market will appreciate information in regard to the themes, plot and setting of the film. With this information, the market will be familiar with the description and will develop expectations from the film. In this catalogue, there will be a genre of movies revolving around the same theme. The genre in this case will be crime films produced and directed in Australia- a country that is credited for producing high quality movies. With such a reputation, the films will be highly graded in the market. As such, the films will have a larger audience during the exhibition. The genre of the movies is stated as crime films. The catalogue will have a collection of movies revolving around prevalent crimes in the country. Australia is a country that has a large number of convicts arrested due to the various crimes that they have committed. The films will be used to motivate the Australian population to avoid engaging in crime. For instance, the population will learn to be disciplined after seeing the predicament of convicts in the movie as they are sentenced in court. Secondly, the catalogue will only feature educative films. The crime films will be educative in that they will be directed toward reducing crime in the country. The crime rates have been known to grow over the last couple of years due to varying reasons. Therefore, producing a catalogue that will help in reducing the prevalence of crimes in the country will be a plausible idea (Rafter and Brown 2011, p 21). Lastly, the films will be produced in the Australian territory. The catalogue will have to mention the genre of the film, producer, director, and production company. This will be a marketing tool that will help in increasing the popularity of the film industry and its players. The country is deeply endowed with resources and has the muscle to produce films. Therefore, using a catalogue with a collection of Australian films will be a positive step. This will not only market the Australian film industry popular but also boost its income. In addition to this, the market will be oriented with the various production houses that have been in existence in the country. The production companies will have an upper hand as they will be heavily marketed. In the end, the production firm will enjoy a larger market. The first movie in the catalogue is Getting Square, which is a 2002 movie directed by Jonathan Teplitzky. The movie revolves around crime scenes as most of the cast is involved in criminal activities. The movie is set on the Australian coast where many criminal activities are prevalent. In the film, Barry is released from jail on parole (Teplitzky, 2003). He is released to take the parental role of caring for his younger brother as they are orphans. Since he has been released from jail, he tries his best to avoid indulging in any criminal activity. He ensures that he does not commit any criminal offence or collude with criminals. In the course of events, an accountant holding the loots of some criminals is arrested. Following his arrest, all the loot accumulated by the criminals over a long period is recovered by the police. Following this event, many criminals are affected as most of their proceeds are confiscated. In order to make ends meet, Barry seeks employment as a worker in a service station. During this time, he is reunited with Jonny. Although Barry has been avoiding any criminal indulgence, Jonny who occasionally steals from the store convinces him to join him in crime. When the two are arrested following a crime, they lose close to twenty thousand dollars (Teplitzky, 2003). In addition to their loss, they are abused by corrupt detectives. Barry feels that it is unfair that they have to lose such a large amount and are still mistreated by the officers. In the turn of events, Barry plans a come back that will get everything square. The movie’s prevalent theme is a crime that is instigated by corruption. The country, especially the Gold coast, is marred with criminal activities (Gallagher 2012, p23). Most of the people in the Gold coast associate in crimes revolving around drugs and drug trafficking. This is negative to the country and is legally unacceptable. The film will be appropriated by the Australian audience as it will help reduce criminal activities in the Coast. The second film in the catalogue will be Bad Eggs. Bad Eggs is an Australian film that was produced in the year 2003. Written and directed by Tony Martin, the film explores various themes in the Australian territory. In its plot, two police officers of the zero-tolerance unit accidentally shoot the corpse of a judge several times (Martin, 2003). In the course of trying to find out the cause of the death of the judge, there are other accidents and incidences that happen. First, the investigative report discovers a conspiracy involving the zero tolerance units. The most prevalent conspiracies in the unit are corruption and bribery, which are growing in prevalence. Though the movie is filled with humor, the setting and the plot revolves around crime. Humorous scenes are incorporated in the movie to attract the attention of the audience as the movie is long. With closer reflection on the crimes committed in the zero tolerance units, it is discovered that the crime rates are ever growing. Since the involved criminals always escaping unscathed, they seemingly bribe people to avoid their arrest. They bribe their way to freedom, by giving loots to different parties. In this case, they have to bribe the zero tolerance commander, Ted Pratt. This being the case, it is evident that the corruption in the state agency is on the rise. It is ironical that the leaders entrusted to deal with crime are the same people highly involved in illegal activities. For instance, the corrupt officers bribe their way to freedom after killing a person (Martin, 2003). As a matter of fact, corruption in the country has been prevalent in that it has extended to the director of Premier of Victoria. This shows that the country is wallowing in corruption as most of the people given the mandate to protect the country are involved in the highest level of corruption. This film is appropriate in this catalogue as it instills knowledge in regard to the prevailing situation in the country with respect to crime. Most of the people mandated to protect the lives of the hoi polloi are involved in uncouth acts. This leads to the derailment of justice as the culprits are not charged for their deeds. Using this film in Australia will be appropriate as it will publicize prevalent criminal activities which include bribery and corruption. According to past records, the Australia government has been at the frontline in dealing corruption in the country. Therefore, the movie would be appropriate in the audience as it instills discipline in averting corruption. The third film is the Animal Kingdom, which is directed by David Michod. This is a crime drama that involves Joshua as he is seen to move in with his estranged mother. Joshua gets to meet three sons of her estranged mother. The three sons are involved in various crimes as they are raised by a family of criminals. The eldest son is an armed robber as he is seen to hide from renegade detectives (Michôd, 2010). The second son is a successful and volatile drug dealer, while the youngest son is an accomplice to his elder brothers. In this context, it is evident that Joshua has joined a family of criminals. In the first incident, Joshua is on a drive with Craig. Altercations seem to occur between Craig and other two young men hurling insults and hostile remarks. Craig pursues the vehicle and hands Joshua a handgun. In the course of events, Baz is shot by police officers (Michôd, 2010). Craig and Pope are razed by this incident and plan for a revenge attack. In their revenge mission, they approach Joshua and ask him to steal a car that would be used in the revenge mission. Though Joshua complies to steal the car, he is not aware of the mission behind stealing the car. The trio incepts the car in the middle of the road and shoots two police officers on the scene. They are arrested the next day for questioning as they are connected to the killing. After questioning the trio is relieved from custody but Craig is killed as he escapes. In the course of events, Joshua is a witness to many murder cases and is given police protection. To avert further instances of killing he decides to move to a safer place. He later opts to settle a court case where Darren and Pope should be released. He offers his testimony and the duo are released. In a bizarre incident, Joshua shoots Pope in the head killing him instantly. Joshua’s embrace of Smurf shows planned criminal act in the film. This film is an appropriate introduction in the catalogue for a number of reasons. The film shows the influences that come with peer living and interaction (Mayer 2012, p 34). Joshua developed criminal into a criminal through the influence from the peers. Secondly, some of the killings are as planned by peers. This shows that the film will be appropriate as an educative piece to the Australian population. The fourth film in the catalogue is Two Hands. This is a 1999 film directed by Gregor Jordan. The crime film revolves around Jimmy, who owes Pando a debt. Pando is a local gangster involved in a series of criminal activities in the area. In a turn of events, Jimmy is hired by Pando, a mob boss in the area. Jimmy is sent to deliver $ 10, 000 to a woman, but the money is stolen by street kids while he is swimming (Jordan, 1999). In a second incident, Pando’s car is stolen in the hands of Jimmy. This worsens the situation as he has to pay for both the car and the stolen money. However, the situation is controlled by Acko, Pando’s accomplice. Jimmy decides to rob a bank in a bid to repay the money. However, the plan is overheard by a jealous friend who informs Pando of the plan. Jimmy is successful in repaying the debt, and is offered greater work by Pando. However, he is not contented and leaves the gang. He even intends to kill Pando but leaves aware of the consequences. Pando is killed by a street boy and members of his mob. At the end of the film, Jimmy is seen to buy two tickets for their travel with Alex. Jimmy is crowned the ultimate winner in the film after a series of events (Jordan, 1999). This movie has a crime as the ostensible theme. This could be used in Australia to avoid any indulgence in illegal street activities. The Australian population will embrace discipline and avoid crime with influence from the movie. The fifth film is a 2003 piece, Ned Kelly, directed by Gregor Jordan. The Kelly family is seen as a well-to-do-with family that is striving toward better living. In the first instance, a police officer offers to buy Kate Kelly a drink. She declines the offer and a hostile situation ensues. With the help of fellow officers, they confiscate the family’s horses and later claim that the family stole the horses (Jordan, 2003). When the officer calls in to see Kate, she refuses to see him. The officer is enraged and informs them of having arrest warrants for stealing horses. A fight ensues between the officer and Kelly. However, the police officer rushes and informs other officers that he had been shot. This creates a situation that presents the Kelly family as criminals. In the wake of events, Ned’s mother is arrested as Ned, Dan, Steve and Joe are on the run. They are considered outlaws in Australia as they are on the run. In their encounter with police officers, the Kelly gang kills three officers including a police constable. So as to avoid capture, the Kelly gang at times has to do without food. Though police officers resort to arresting their close allies, the Kelly gang takes hostage of Glenrowan town. The Kelly gang fights with police officers in a shootout as they hide in an inn. Knowing the battle is lost, Dan and Steve commit suicide as Ned and Joe are shot by police officers (Jordan, 2003). Seemingly unshaken, Ned continues to fight the police officers in an engaging shootout. In the end, he is cornered and shot unconscious. He is later sentenced to death by hanging for the crimes committed. In conclusion, the set of the crime films stated above is an excellent approach to selling the films. The catalogue has selected the above films as they revolve around criminal activities. Selling these films will be positive in teaching the Australian population on the need to embrace decent behavior. The prevalent theme in these films is bribery, corruption, killing and theft with violence. As such, criminal activities will be prevented. References Animal Kingdom 2010. [Film] Directed by Michôd David. Australia: Liz Watts. Bad Eggs, 2003. [Film] Directed by Martin Tony. Australia: Martin Tony. Gallagher D., 2012. World Cinema and the Visual Arts. New York: Anthem Press Gettin Square, 2003. [Film] Directed by Teplitzky Jonathan. Australia: Martin Fabinyi, Timothy White and Trisha Lake. Mayer G., 2012. Historical Dictionary of Crime Films. New York: Scarecrow Press Ned Kelly, 2003. [Film] Directed by Jordan Gregor. Australia: Lynda House and Nelson Woss. Rafter, N. and Brown M., 2011.Criminology Goes to the Movies: Crime Theory and Popular Culture. New York: NYU Press Two hands, 1999. [Film] Directed by Jordan Gregor. Australia: Marian Macgowan. Read More