Industrialization and Indifference - Essay Example

Marx was a German revolutionary economist who is known to be the founder of the Communist movement. He noted the wide industrial change in Britain and decided to write about it. Besides being an economist, Marx was also a philosopher. Marx observed the class struggle in which the oppressed reacted against the oppressors. He also described the victory of one class as a pavement to the future freedom of the rest of society and the generations to come. In the past Britain history, several groups emerged each claiming the authority over the other. The foundation of all Marxist leads to the analysis of political parties that formed in the early years of British history.
According to Marxists, the foundation of the Major political parties in Britain was based on the economic status of the society by then. The major aim of the political parties was to address the major issues affecting the life of the common people in society. Politics of one class of people were being fought by all means and it was all aimed at ensuring equity in the places of work. There came the formation of the Marxists in the early years. This brought the major political parties we have today in Britain. These are the; Tory Party, the Labour Party, and the Liberal Party (Daub 2005). 
The three major parties have not been seen to antagonize the Marxist thesis rather they conform to it. Marx revealed the driving forces of history in order to facilitate the making of history. In the course of the struggle between the classes, some acquire or lose cohesion and confidence. Thus political parties act as a weapon in the struggle between classes. In his argument, Marx argued that there was a rising tension and disagreement between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. According to Marx, the proletariats were being exploited by the capitalists who were the bourgeoisie.  The exploitation being experienced by the proletariat was based on the wealth that was being created and enjoyed by the bourgeoisie. This major source of the tension being experienced by the two groups was economic exploitation where the working had little share of what they produced. The materials produced in the factories could be sold at a price higher than the workers’ wages. This meant that the workers who were mainly the proletariat could work in the factories but could not afford to build the items they produced due to the low wages (Barry 2005).
The antagonism that Marx described was based on wealth superiority. The oppressors wanted to acquire all the wealth that was being made by the proletariats. This was the major cause of the tension between the two groups. Riots would arise as the oppressed advocated for the equal treatment of the two groups. There arose a revolution aimed at overthrowing the oppressors together with their supporters (Milkovinch 2010). 
According to Marx, he believed that capitalism was the destructor of the peace between the two major groups. He went on to describe in depth how the wealth being enjoyed by the bourgeoisie was a result of the hard work of the proletariat who were the main workers in the factories. In his observation, Marx argued that this antagonism would lead to a revolution that could be aimed at the oppressors who were the bourgeoisie.  The rising competition between the two groups makes the commercial crisis get a bad state.  The increased rioting has been attributed to the oppression by the bourgeoisie (Daub 2005). Marx states that the exploitation of this group of people would lead to intensified resentment causing more hatred.  A revolution would arise that would lead to the overthrow of the capitalists and their external supporters. 


However, the situation that Marx described seems to have faded today. This is because there are groups that strongly advocate for the equal treatment of all classes of people in society. There are some who stage their claims and strongly defend the working class calling for meaningful wages. The issue of one group dominating and oppressing the other has completely been dealt with. This has brought a lot of change in society where the working class is given fair treatment in their wages. People are now receiving considerably fair wages compared to the time when Marx founded the Communist movement (Barry 2005).
In conclusion, the indifferences that are experienced in society are mainly based on the social classes that develop with time. The major cause of antagonism has been on the ownership of wealth and the domination of power. This was the situation in Britain that gave rise to the two antagonist groups. If one group tends to oppress the other mainly in the economic sector, a revolution may arise. Wealth ownership has been the major cause of disagreement between or among groups sharing some similarities or having a common interest in the wealth in a region. This results in resentment and hatred between the antagonizing groups. It may go further to cause rioting and mass destruction through fighting for victory.  A revolution emerges and the oppressing group is overthrown. Read More