As argued by Peak (2004), a long-standing relationship between crime and tourism has led to major crimes such as robbery, burglary among others since tourism has very lucrative targets because they carry large amounts of money and other valuables. Secondly, tourists are easy targets due to their vulnerability and relaxed modes, sometimes careless on tour. In addition, these tourists are in foreign places and do not wish to case problems, thus less likely to report the crimes against them. It has been determined that the leading cause of tourism decline involves security and safety.
With increasing crime rate in tourism prone zones, most governments’ policy makers have to devise policy that counter the crime rate in respective countries. Protecting tourists from criminal and terrorism necessitates being proactive in stopping these crimes from the starting point, even beyond borders. Every country that hosts tourists must be very active and constructively play a major role in developing tools required in fighting crimes and related activities (Morin, 2006). The cause of these criminal activities leading to poor security for the tourists depends on the security status and the political temperatures of the host country.
Terrorists and criminals behave the same since their actions of malice aim at human and drug trafficking, money laundering, as well as corruption. The first step in fighting terrorism and crimes is becoming very vigilant, alert, and actively participating in the affairs, safety, and security of the tourists. The counter-terrorism and crime requires reconstruction efforts across security agencies across boundaries. Security programs of the host country and their efforts must well documented and adhered to, without necessarily providing it publicly, but it can be done in a private manner and providing public confidence.
The efforts of combating both the local and transnational crime can be linked both positively and negatively to the counterterrorism policies. Although these links may raise issues on the priorities, between crime and terrorism, but the two elements may surmount to one if the crimes in this case are committed on tourists, thus becoming an international issue. Therefore, the argument in this is that counter-criminal policies protecting tourists should be weighed in the same manner and sensitivity as those policies in regards to terrorism (Morin, 2006).
Dredge & Jenkins (2007) argues also that the physical characteristics of the tourist location may also contribute to crime. These centers and places known for tourists may be old without any private security officers and they may lack video monitoring technologies as well, thus exposing them to adverse risks to criminal activities. In addition to that, the known tourists’ areas have been characterized by high population turnover and anonymity thereby giving criminals or terrorists higher advantage to conceal them.
Such offenders may tactfully hide among people, especially when security officers deal with the huge traffic volumes and other routine work that are not related to crime. Finally, most of the local tourists’ locations are known for their scenic and isolated nature source locations, thus inviting even the adventurous tourists to explore the remote surroundings from abroad. Security policy makers must upgrade the security set ups especially boosting security technology apparatus in the hotels, parks, and along the beaches of the coastal regions.
Employing security and guides along with the tourists’ visitors, both local and foreign must, and have been made mandatory in most countries. According to Morin (2006), routine activities is the most theoretical basis for the argument purporting that crime rates increase as does the number of visitors to an area. This argument is based on the direct proportionality between crime and population. However, Bhatia (2002), argues that increase in visitors (especially tourists) does not necessarily contribute to the social disorganization but the increase in income would make some of the effects of social disorganization.
Read More