STATS - Statistics Project Example

Explaining Statistics In the present age of information boom, readers and viewers are fed with varied and diversified data, with support from statistical figures and facts. However, quite often this leaves the interested person in a confused state. In addition, the facts provided by different media publications often follow their own interests to present a rosy picture about certain product, process or service. Hence, it is essential to dissect and analyze the statistical data in a direction to find the truth.

The article under consideration relates to data regarding “Centers for Disease Control” (CDC). The author of this article, titled “The CDC Conspiracy” has genuinely tried to conduct some media analysis on this subject. Commenting on Brain Hooker’s paper that covered the facts about this topic, the article is critical about its coverage as the paper never bothered to look into the reviews of other media publications like The Washington Post, The New York Times or The Los Angels Times.

This provides evidence that Hooker had certain interest to suppress some useful critical statistical data, as claimed by a researcher on the subject and later in a story published in Hooker’s paper by William Thompson.Although CNN tried to present information from two opposite sides, this report also added to confusion of the interested readers. With the background of a senior CDC scientist, who turned a whistle blower: a senior CDC researcher supported the allegation that important data was held-back, intentionally.

(Butterworth, 2015)The analysis of this article also throws some light on the media rivalry, which often results in pinpointing each other’s mistakes. However, A few impartial researchers like Rebecca Goldin will always be there, helping anxious readers to reach an impartial conclusion. Work-citedButterworth, Trevor. (2015). The CDC Conspiracy, Stats.org Retrieved on March 17, 2015, from: http://www.stats.org/the-cdc-conspiracy/