Displaying and performing body poses on the stage may not constitute a sport. There is nothing bad with wanting to look good but being obsessed by how one’s looks and people perception about his appearance is the vanity part of bodybuilding. Therefore, it is accurate to conclude that there is some element of vanity in bodybuilding since most people who opt for it are in one way or another dissatisfied with the way they appear (Chandler, Cronin, & Vamplew, 2007). They want to do something about their body appearance and look good.
Spending so much time to push the standards of bodybuilding beyond the limits of normal working out contributes to the vanity tag that is associated with bodybuilding. The vanity part has to be managed in moderation before destroying the life of the person involved and making it like an idol (Houdmann, 2013). The confidence exuded by the bodybuilder can go beyond the reason for working out. A man being obsessed with his appearance does not augur well with women and many other groups’ perceptions in the society.
Women believe they are the ones to spend more time in front of the mirror dressing up and applying makeup and not men. People on the extreme side of the controversy view bodybuilding as a dysfunctional sport that represents pure vanity. Consequently working has to be with a clear purpose and not promoting obsession with one’s looks and body strength (Russell, 2006). The vanity of building is determined by the person who is working out and the purpose of him working out. Working out just to improve an individual physical appearance is not bad.
The hype that people give about appearance and looks make some body builders to feel so much full of themselves to the extent of promoting the vanity tag (Wolf, 2011). Professional bodybuilding cannot be considered as a sport. The contestants only compete amongst themselves and this cannot qualify it as a sport. Early bodybuilding entailed few components, agility test, a strength test, and the aesthetic portion of the contest. Modern competitions only comprises of the aesthetic portion in the judgment which compares closely to what is done in the beauty contests by women.
These contests do not comprise of a sport. A four year-study that was carried out in Mecca-Southern California on bodybuilding revealed a basic set of discrepancies between what is projected as ideal by the subculture and actually takes place. The differences are studied to determine which ones come from changes that have taken place in bodybuilding and which one are structural to it. Body building should be a source of motivation for people who engage in it since they want to compete with other participants.
The problem arises when people become so much obsessed with their looks or glorify their own looks (Banawich). Bodybuilding can be an interesting sport when people who participate in it take part with the sole reason of competition and showcasing their talents. Loving the body physique so much due to accumulated muscles and spending unlimited time on working out at the expense of other economic activities makes bodybuilding to be vanity. Nevertheless, the physical body can also impact on one’s spirituality (Houdmann, 2013).
Maintaining a physical fit body is good for anyone. Bodybuilding results into improved body composition; it leads to low fat that leads to reduction in chances of lifestyle threatening diseases. Changing the way somebody looks can hugely increase the self-esteem of a person and enhance self-confidence. Taking small steps towards attaining the kind of body that one requires trains his endurance and patience as well as cultivating hard work and commitment. Competition is a good avenue where people can apply for transforming themselves; and even their entire lives.
Improving someone looks is an important step towards attaining enhanced self-esteem. Achieving a bodybuilder’s physique is not easy. It takes a great amount of stamina, skill and practice to be able to build muscles as well as come on stage and display the muscles in different poses (Lambert, Frank & Evens, 2004).
Read More