Digital citizenship further improves the commerce among the citizens. Business operations are improved through the application of digital citizenship by identifying the illegal business using software which can identify the business which is illegal. Through the internet, most of the business transactions can be monitored and in any case there is illegal business, it can be easily identified and the culprit can face the law for engaging in illegal activities. This helps to improve the national citizenship because the business operations are monitored which helps to eliminate illegal business thus upholding the national laws of integrity.
Digital citizenship helps to improve communication among citizens by applying better means of communicating. Individuals exchange ideas with people from different backgrounds and learn to appreciate the values of other people (Couros 2007). Digital citizenship upholds the rights of individuals to socialize and exchange information which helps to improve the application of the national laws for instance the right to interact with others. Through communication, citizens will exchange ideas and in the process will learn to be honest thus improving the virtue of integrity which helps to uphold the national citizenship.
Furthermore, digital citizenship improves the literacy of people by learning how to apply the modern technology and how. When the citizens are aware and know how to use the digital technology, they will be able to acquire skills to evaluate the sources of the internet and accept information which is valid and from a valid source (Couldry 2007). Through this practice, the citizens will able to make informed decisions which will mould the moral behaviors. For instance not all the digital sources of information can be valid meaning that some other information can be misleading and can influence the conduct of citizens negatively.
This will enable citizens to post reliable data on the internet improving the conduct of individuals towards national citizenship. Digital citizenship enables individuals to maintain the legal rights and regulations set by a country that restricts the digital sources of information. Among the laws of any country is to protect the property knowledge of individuals (Couldry 2007). In this regard, there are laws which protect individuals and their work from copyrights and piracy. Through these regulations, individuals learn how to rely on their own work and not other people’s work which in turn promotes moral behaviors among individuals.
In this aspect, the national citizenship is upheld as a result of digital citizenship. Digital citizenship further helps citizens to exercise their rights and duties. Through the digital citizenship, citizens learn to be independent and honest with their duties (Leighninger 2011). The internet sources of information promote honest among citizens because information taken the internet can be easily detected and the student can be heavily punished according to the laws of plagiarism. In this regard, the students learn to be honest and abandon vices like cheating and this promotes and improves the national citizenship.
On the same note, the digital sources improve the safety of works done by other people from being exhausted. Digital citizenship promotes privacy of a country’s or organizations confidential data. The internet technology provides software which keeps confidential data for the company or organization (Moll & Krug 2008). Due to the competition in the business market, there is need to keep some information private so that it cannot be used by competitors to gain advantage and excel in the market.
In this regard, the digital citizenship helps individuals to keep some information private and therefore the country’s or organizations’ private data cannot be accessed by the rivals thus upholding the national citizenship. Digital citizenship enhances learning through acquiring of skills and knowledge. Through the internet sources, the citizens are able to learn from each other the skills that are important in leadership (Richards 2010).
Read More