Download file to see previous pages...
On the other hand, there are the kinds of people who live their lives and do not mind about the lives of others. There are those people who always want to show off to other people. The extract is a reflection of how people live in the society and, to a large extent, the values they cherish (Dillon, 2009).
Many aspects shape different human societies. These include the different people’s cultures and the copied or learned culture. If one lives in a society where people do not like to see others making progress in life, then jealous is bound to occur especially to individuals who succeed and make it in life. It is a social construct which exists in the society, and that contributes its social set up. There are cultures in which people become happy of other’s success. In such communities, the people value one another and will even do meet ups in social places to have fun (Dillon, 2009).
Different kinds of people make up a society i.e. there are those who like boasting of their possessions and who will not care about others. There are those who are quite sympathetic or are easily touched by other’s tribulations and are often easy to help. Likewise, there are those who although they may want to help, they have no means and therefore remain helpless when it comes to facing the need people’s problems. Such characters are what defines a society and are what contributes to social set-ups that exist (Ritzer, 1996).
The different cultures in a society to which people are accustomed are usually shaped by various things and can be viewed from various dimensions. The scopes include technological, economic, political, and belief-conceptual dimension. These dimensions, to a large extent, dictate how different people relate to one another and their perception about life.
The technological dimension, for example, is largely involved in shaping people’s ideas, behaviour
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The paper explores the concept of fashion and Georg Simmel. A broad delineation of the term fashion relates to being first with what is new in the market. This implies that fashion oscillates, wherein a certain object or an activity becomes popular amongst a certain segment of the society, while others view this segment as possessing the status.
Georg Simmel and Walter Benjamin were famous and interesting German philosophers who lived at the end of the 19th and in the beginning of the 20th centuries. They both contributed a lot in philosophical and sociological approaches concerning urban culture and the human position in contemporary economical, political and cultural conditions.
Simmel lived in Berlin the most part of his life, and this fact of his biography predetermined his views on modern urban life. In his best known essay The Metropolis and Mental Life Simmel "analyses individual life in the context of modern, metropolitan life, contrasting the social forces and structures of urban life with those of traditional rural and small town settings" (Micro Approaches and Simmel).
Simmel, writing years after Marx, echoed much of the Marxist themes in his own works and conducted many philosophically and psychologically oriented investigations based on Marx's propositions. For this paper I would be comparing Marx's concept of "commodity fetishism" to Simmel's "autonomy of objective culture."
Georg Simmel’s concepts and theorist perspectives on differentiated sociological applications had many theories (Kaern 32). The three concepts that will endeavor to show their importance to sociology as a subject are social network: rational versus organic group
Louis Wirth was one of the Chicago school scholars who wrote a paper in urban sociology, precisely on urbanism as a way of life.
According to Wirth, urbanism is determined by the population density and the heterogeneity of the individuals within an urban setup. He emphasized
derability of human relationships is currently palpable, and devastating facts can be revealed when one closely examines a metropolitan lifestyle where a purely intellectualistic individual remains indifferent to all personal things. According to Simmel, the modern culture is
The connection that exists between individuals and their society is not merely another physical, or a maybe functional unity, or even well planned systematic unity. The relationship is a columniation of a number of factors and activities. Greene & Kropf (2009) say
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Goerg Simmel for FREE!