The Four Behavioral Styles and Conflict - Assignment Example

Social Communication Styles Affiliation: Briefly what did you learn about Social/Communication Styles, There is social communication style that is good or bad but they are all good as they serve different purposes and especially when combined they lead to ultimate success. People should learn what type of social communication style they belong to and which are their strengths and how they can use these strengths for the benefit of the other people and especially in case of team work in any area.

Understanding other people’s social communication style is good to in order to avoid conflict and in order to solve conflicts in case they occur due to the differences in people’s communication styles which affect behavior. How can you apply your learning(s) to conflict management? Conflict management requires first an understanding of the cause of the conflict which will require dialogue with the parties involved in the conflict. During the dialogue period, the communication styles of the people will be revealed by studying how they are behaving and talking and relating to each other and to the conflict managers in general.

This will provide a rough picture of their social communication style. An understanding of the four social styles which are: director, analytical thinker, socializer/ influencer and socializer, will enable the conflict manager to use their strengths and weakness to mediate and enable them to mend their differences hence ending the conflict in a peaceful manner (Markham, 1996). Which of the above steps did you find helpful and why, Step 9 which involves teaming skills for success and how the four styles mentioned above can be applied to different teams.

Teams have different people all of whom have different personalities, behaviors and communications styles. Communication in a team is necessary for success and productivity increase. If people in a team can be able to understand the communication of each other, then conflicts can be avoided and deadlines can be met without problems. Team members just need to understand what style each team member falls into so that they can use their strengths for the ultimate success of the team as the step elaborates.

Which if any added little to your learning, Step 3 which is the platinum rule is a very short discussion which has a more detailed discussion in step 6. This step offers what can be termed as a summary and which is not very elaborate and hence difficult to be understood and its ultimate relation to the social communication styles that are being discussed in all the steps. I considered this step just a waste of precious time and instead of giving a summary or what can also be considered as introduction to a topic that will be discussed later on in detail; the step should have chosen another area of the social communication styles of conflict management to discuss.

What changes if any would you recommend be made to this learning module and why so?The learning module should be reorganized in the way the steps have been presented. The current steps are not flowing and have no clear beginning and end and it seems like the reader repeats some of the already discussed points in some steps while others are completely irrelevant. The organization of the module should start with the social communication styles and then the discussion about teams and finally end with the conflict and conflict management and not how it is currently organized.

This will paint a better picture and make for quicker understanding of the whole module. ReferencesMarkham, U. (1996). Managing Conflict. New York: Thorson Publishers.