Download file to see previous pages...
This goal is achieved fairly well. What results is a society that is aligned to the needs of the government and large corporations. The harm however to individuals and the society as a whole is just as prominent. He further implies that the society has been duped to accept that obligatory government run schooling is necessary.
He refutes the notion vastly instilled on people that success only emerges from schooling. He reminds us of various people that have actually gained success without formal schooling. Lincoln for one became president with just a fourth grade education. I for one can think of a dozen of examples of students that have accomplished a lot without having a formalized education. He draws a parallel that many learn computing without much professional help where one learns by just curiosity (Gatto, 60). It is a learning experience where skill emerges.
Gatto firmly argues that the use of grades and tests scores as measure of quality as has been continuously integrated in our minds is very wrong. Education he says does not give you the education you need to defend yourself in the world, only the person can give himself that. On the same note, he still contends to the importance of going to high school and college but it does not necessarily give one the key to progress. He says that the system will fashion you in a way you will think you self devised but the fact remains you are slave of the system. Education does not give you the skills to think for yourself.
Gatto asserts that the notion that education is compulsory has darker and deeper rooting. He quotes from professor Arthur Calhoun’s book, ‘social history of the family; a sociological philosophy of education’ and William Kirkpatrick’s ‘ education and social crisis’ to further reflect the advance of a scientific control in the world’s population using education as a tool.
Gatto gives reference to political notions drawn by Plato, Darwin, Wundt, Fichte,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Numerous countries have taken different strategies to win wars, and the world has experienced nations use biological weapons, which have been the most suitable strategy. This article explicates the in-depth knowledge while providing historical perspective of biological weapons, chemical weapons, and nuclear weapons that nations have used to engage in wars.
Nuclear proliferation has two branches - horizontal and vertical. Vertical proliferation occurs within a state, when countries which are already nuclear powers add up more to their arsenal. While on the other hand, horizontal proliferation occurs when the use of nuclear weapons spreads from one nation to another.
The weapons which are now being developed are better known as ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’. In the world today the global community wants peace. Therefore no state should possess weapons which can destruct the peace in the world.
The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, have made it all too clear that terrorists and terrorist organizations have all the capability to wreak havoc on the innocent population with weapons of mass destruction. The threat of annihilation is brutally clear if we remain unaware of what these groups can offer.
Derivates play an important role in streamlining economic activity, as well as to facilitate liquidity in the markets. Credit derivatives are an especially sought after instrument due to the legal exemptions afforded it. On the flip side, the inherent
The loss witnessed by the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki proves this point. Nevertheless, the superpowers at the time went ahead to build an arsenal of nuclear capacity enough to destroy the world, which we refer as weapons of
However each of these weapons have their pros and cons.
Deadly arsenals are the current more advanced military weapons that can be used for mass- destruction. Countries with such weapons are feared throughout the world. However,
esident Bush believed that attacking such a country that possessed weapons of mass destruction might act as an example for other countries that intend to harbor such projects. These instigated other countries to begin manufacturing WMDs, for instance, North Korea, for the
including the one on trade center in USA led to the realization of the threat in case terrorist group obtain these chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. WMD are probably off limit to small terrorist groups, but large terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and Aum Shinrikyo from
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Weapons-of-Mass for FREE!