Inter-Cultural Conflicts and Its Resolution - Essay Example

It is imperative that different ways in which people embrace while resolving conflicts exist, hence, the term “intercultural conflicts resolution”. Mitchell Hammer did set a system that resolves cultural conflicts (Lederach, 1996, p.67). The system is of two theories, namely direct versus indirect. In addition, he believes that people should heed the fact that cultural communities have different styles that conflict their culture in communities. Hence, knowledge calls for mutual understanding of one’s behavior to avoid conflicting issues.

In this scenario, the verbal direct path is vital, this is because one will mean what he or she says, and again will say what he or she means. The northern European and white American cultures are admirable examples of the cultures that use discussion styles in communication, and so this is the best way of conflict dodging. Similarly, the engagement style also fits proper communication that avoids conflict. It is noteworthy that in the engagement style, sincerity is a key factor and so it judges the intensity that each party passes to communicate.

Moreover, the recommendation style puts its emphasis on the language that is ambiguous. This minimizes the chance of conflict arousal. Herein, this style maintains calm emotion and, hence, reserving it to avoid conflict.Emphasizing conflict does arise between the intermingling of the people who have different cultures but primarily need to associate in one way or another. According to Lederach (part two), conflict resolution is the desire to end conflicts. However, conflict transformation entails the conversation of the conflicts into something that is more of a benefit to society.

Critical move for conflict transformations includes the shift of focus from content /issues causing the conflicts in the relationship of its context. Furthermore, expand the timeline in dealing with conflict and lastly, add to the aim of solving conflicts that are not beneficial in order to build a desirable thing.Notably, in his book “Art and Soul of Peace Building,” Lederach incorporates a lot of reconciliation for peacebuilding framework. Ultimately, he notes that issues like restorative justice, public truth-telling, and healing in a collective way are essential for conflict transformation.

In conclusion, the essay above analyses the convention wisdom that reconciliation can commence as the agreement of peace ends a conflict. Conflict resolution should be in integration to the framework that efforts reconciliation. Furthermore, the enhancement of some vital efforts for reconciliation includes reparation, apology, forgiveness, truth acknowledgment, and lastly, justice retributive.