The author of this essay "The Theory of Conflict" provides some theories which describe the origin of a conflict. According to the text, conflict theory is probably one of those which have remained intact in spite of the fact that its perspectives are gradually becoming out of date. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
As Collins (1974) writes, "the level of interpersonal interaction is all-inclusive; by the same token, it is highly abstract. To reduce its myriad complexities to causal order requires theory on another level of analysis. The most fruitful tradition of the explanatory theory is the conflict tradition, running from Machiavelli and Hobbes to Marx and Weber" (Collins, 1974, p.56). It needs to be noted that conflict approach should be viewed in two interrelated contexts: the authors' contemporary settings as well as the modern stage of sociopolitical development (ibid).
Hobbes and Machiavelli were the first apologists of conflict theory, but their studies were directed rather to political dynamic enhancement than to certain social issues. Human behavior was explained in sense of their mercantile nature and materialistic interests (ibid; Coser, 1977), so the main precondition for conflict approach was the assumption that individuals struggle for commodities and defend their interests in the most desperate way. Threat and violence breed nothing, but additional cruelty as well as the institutionalization and legalization of social and political intimidation (Aron, 1965). (Individuals' behavior is explained in terms of their self-interests in a material world of threat and violence. Furthermore, social order was founded primarily on coercion, organized by governments and aimed at oppressing certain social classes in favor of narrow circles. Machiavelli added into the study another component, which was an ideology, an artificial control method: in the realms of belief and devotion (associated with law or religion), and in the secret world of struggle over influence, virtues, concepts and mores do not precede interaction, but are introduced as socially created doctrine that serves the interests of certain factions.
Marx (1818-1883) was probably the main contributor to conflict perspective, as he concretized the earlier studies and Hobbes' scientific inquiries in order to add more specific factors determining the lines of division among clashing interests. Furthermore, the social scientist pointed to material and economic circumstances which activate particular interest manifestation. In addition, his theory of economic evolution became a sociological framework for several generations, since it precisely indicated the wheels that facilitated the achievement of political goals: market regulation, commodity and consumption culture creation and the low satisfaction of basic needs (in the majorities). Nevertheless, I would like to narrow my focus on Marx's sociological views, which could be explained as follows.
First of all, "historically, particular forms of property (slavery, feudal landholding, capital) are upheld by the coercive power of the state; hence classes formed by property divisions (slaves and slave-owners, serfs and lords, capitalists and workers) are the opposing agents in the struggle for political power the underpinning of their means of livelihood" (Marx and Engels, 1930, p.48). Secondly, financial contributions establish the degree to which social groups are entitled to arrange their 'interest struggle', such mobilizing conditions constitute an array of interrelated variables between class and political influence.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
It implies that the conflict violence is no longer evident, attitudes are no longer hostile and the structure of conflict has been transformed. As a field of study, conflict resolution began in the 1950s and 1960s. The causes of conflict can be analyzed at three levels, which are; individual, state, and the international system.
Marxism has been extremely influential amongst the perspectives in sociology especial where criminology is concerned. In criminology Marxist explanations have shifted slightly from the traditional Marxist approach to much more thinned-down approach. Marxist traditional approach is commonly referred to as left idealism by critics because it was considered more ideal and less practical.
There are a number of factors, from which conflict in the workplace may emanate including perception of people in the workplace over a number of areas as resource utilization (CDR Associates, 2007). Conflicts entail a number of characteristics that are unique to them.
The absolute fundamental aim is to make money out of satisfying customers. Yes, that is the only way to make profits for all the businesses and there is no other shortcut for getting profits. Deriving from the quotation, the next issue is how to satisfy your customer. Customer satisfaction can be attained through better products, quality, etc.
A reflection on conflict theories helps in understanding their application in society values.
After reading the chapter on conflict theories, I have come to understand various theories. One of the theories that I
Conflict theory can be described as people in a society are distributed in groups based on social order and this social order is governed and enforced by those having power. The power is not in the hands of individuals, but groups. Every individual living in a society is a
Conflict theories intrinsically criticize the social system, pointing out the general contrast in ideologies. The two have different methods of explaining the stereotyping, deviance, and ethnocentrism of society.
The thing that underpins the functionalist view of religion as a contributing factor to the continuation and health of the society is that fact that it views it as one of the major components that make up the society besides family, school, education, mass media, economy, and polity (Beckford, 2006).
The basis of this theory is the observation that; different social classes within a society have differing amounts of material and non-material resources, which allow the ones with access to resources to exploit those ones without the access. The theory was developed by Karl Marx in the mid-1800s, through observing the conflict between the capitalist societies; those who owned the factors of production had the powers to manipulate and exploit those who did not have access to such resources (Marx, 1971).
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"The Theory of Conflict"
with a personal 20% discount.