We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Research Cloning - Book Report/Review Example

Comments (0)
This is a comparison and contrast essay on the two opposing views regarding human cloning. “Yes, Don't Impede Medical Progress” by Virginia Postrel is in favor of research cloning. “Crossing Lines” by Charles Krauthammer, on the other hand, is a secular argument against research cloning…
Download full paper
Research Cloning
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Research Cloning

Download file to see previous pages... Postrel is pro research cloning. Her last statement serves as her thesis: “We should let the process continue.” According to her, research cloning as of this time is still at its initial stage, “ACT and others in the field are still doing very basic research, not developing clinical therapies.” Then she shows the difference between science and politics: “Science is about exploring the unknown and cannot offer guarantees” while “politics… feeds on fear, uncertainty, and doubt….” She then refutes the three basic arguments for banning therapeutic cloning: that a fertilized egg is a person; someone may be tempted to implant a cloned embryo in a woman’s womb and produce a baby; and that random reproduction may lead to “manufacturing” that “robs one of autonomy.”
Moreover, she cites specific examples from actual results of the researches by the Advanced Cell Technology that “it took 71 eggs to produce a single success, and in the best case, the embryo grew to only six cells before dying.” She adds that since it is difficult to obtain eggs so “therapeutic cloning may ultimately prove impractical for clinical treatments” and “could be more important as a technique for understanding cell development or studying the mutations that lead to cancer.” She also uses definition and analogy to prove her points....
According to him, permitting the conduct of one may lead to the conduct of the other; since research cloning is allowed for therapeutic purposes, there is a tendency for a temptation to pursue reproductive cloning for other purposes aside from giving a childless couple an offspring.
Like Postrel, he defines the scientific terms and processes involved in this issue. He also gives analogies and examples. He contrasts science and morality. He cites the different issues debated in the House regarding this. He is very specific and clear in his arguments, and passionate too. His passion about his belief makes his argument effective. According to him, "reproductive cloning is universally abhorred" despite its promise of "study or cure." He argues that research cloning is not therapeutic. He then proceeds to discuss why he considers cloning as "ruthless exploitation of the embryo" and "dangerous" through his three objections: "First, the Brave New World Factor: Research cloning gives man too much power for evil. Second, the Slippery Slope: The habit of embryonic violation is in and of itself dangerous. Violate the blastocyst today and every day, and the practice will inure you to violating the fetus or even the infant tomorrow. Third, Manufacture: The very act of creating embryos for the sole purpose of exploiting and then destroying them will ultimately predispose us to a ruthless utilitarianism about human life itself."
Both writers have strong arguments. Postrel is more credible because of her presentation of actual facts about cloning that it takes 71 eggs to produce a single success and that it is even difficult to secure eggs in the first place. However, her credible presentation seems to end abruptly. The reader is left ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
The term methodology usually causes confusion to most students. Even the most seasoned researchers, find it difficult to understand its implications. This makes the term to be applied in more than one ways of which, some are contradicting. Due to the complexity of research, four elements define a credible research.
3 Pages(750 words)Book Report/Review
Cloning research paper
(Cibelli 2002). The production of Dolly by cloning indicated the possibility of producing live mammalian off springs through the process of asexual reproduction by cloning with an adult donor nucleus. The successful cloning of Dolly the sheep fueled the prospect of potential human cloning which finally permeated public consciousness in 1997.
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
Research Paper
In fact, the article considers these factors to be more prevalent due to intensified competition in the industry among numerous hospitals in America. Nevertheless, this has led to a need for increasing awareness of crucial need for regulating the operating costs in order to deal with the increasing expectation of patient care quality.
3 Pages(750 words)Book Report/Review
Research critique
The first research is entitled "Heart failure patient learning needs after hospital discharge." This research is relevant to understand the needs of heart patients once there are outside the hospital premises. Outpatient Heart Failure Learning Needs Inventory was used to rate subjects' of the importance of educational topics.
12 Pages(3000 words)Book Report/Review
Qualitative Research
More than anything else, qualitative research allows the researcher to explore the possible paths s/he might take in the course of research. While quantitative research provides a predetermined path to analysis and interpretation, qualitative research is mainly exploratory and the researcher, at every stage of the study, undergoes unexpected discoveries and realizations about the topic at hand.
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review
Are the Clones Real People Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro
Many people associate cloning with science-fiction novels, not with real life, but animal cloning is a process that is being attempted today all over the world, and human cloning might be next. Human beings everywhere tell themselves and each other stories that both comfort and frighten them.
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review
Moral Status of Cloning Humans
The basic motive of this project is to analyze Michael Tooley’s article, “Moral Status of Cloning Humans”. He says that the idea or theory of genetic determinism is not correct, therefore, cloning to produce persons cannot be labeled intrinsically wrong. Tooley further asserts that not only is cloning not immoral, but it can help us improve our lives.
1 Pages(250 words)Book Report/Review
In these regards, a pragmatic approach is necessary to articulate the core elements of effective leadership communication. In exploring this pragmatic approach, a multidimensional model is advanced that considers effective leadership communication skills
15 Pages(3750 words)Book Report/Review
Research Methods
Psychologists test all assumptions to find out the truth. This truth often challenges people because it does not correspond to their beliefs. Beauty standards, gender roles, expression of emotions are influenced by
2 Pages(500 words)Book Report/Review
Nursing research
rom the research data, the calculated mean age of the participants under study was 81.46 meaning that the study mainly focused on the old people in this particular context (Lee, Pang, Hui, Kwok, Leung, Yu, & Lee, 2013). The quantitative technique is suitable for examination of
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Research Cloning for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us