The Communist Manifesto - Essay Example

Download file to see previous pages... The book Communist Manifesto has four fundamental parts. In the first part, Marx explores the communist’s theory of history also looking into the relationship between proletarians and bourgeoisie. He proceeds to explain the relationship between the proletarians and Communists in the second part. In the third part, Marx diagnoses and exposes the flaws in previous socialist literature. The final part explores the relationship between Communists and other parties. The Communist Manifesto is undoubtedly stood the test of time and still remains one of the most crucial literatures that influence and provoke thoughts about capitalism and class. The Bourgeois and Proletarians Conflict in the society is influenced significantly by means of production and is major thrust that leads to social change in the society (Ferrante-Wallace, 2005). Marx and Engels’s Communist Manifesto remains one of the most important literatures that contribute extensively to the field of sociology. The book opens with the suggestion that the society as a history of class struggles and delves into explaining this proposition in the successive forty-one pages or so. In the first section of the book, “Bourgeois and Proletarians”, Marx foresees development and eventual fall of the bourgeoisie, which was the dominant class in the society during his era. Prior to the bourgeoisie rise to prominence, the society existed in feudal order ruled by patrician landowners together with corporate federations. A manufacturing class captured international and domestic business through efficient production compared to the closed guilds as new markets such as America and other international markets were discovered. The manufacturing class started to gain prominence fueled by their increasing economic influence. They gained political influence destroying the conventional feudal arrangement of the society, which had been an obstacle on they path (Ferrante-Wallace, 2005).French Revolution, as argued by Marx, was a perfect pointer towards the bourgeois self-ambition. The emergence of the bourgeois resulted into a new social class, the proletariat also referred to as wage-laborers (Appelrouth & Edles, 2008). The proletariats had no personal means of production, thus resorted to selling their labor power for survival. This class was essentially the main driver of the bourgeois production mode. According to Marx, there is increasing rift between capitalism forces of production and with its abusive relationship, which is bound to make proletariat to initiate revolution distinct to any other that has taken place in the history of the society. With the expansion in the bourgeois industries, the conditions of the proletariats continued to worsen. The deterioration in the living conditions of the proletariats yields a revolutionary quest within the proletariats, which eventually obliterates the bourgeois tormenters (Appelrouth & Edles, 2008; Merton & Storer, 1993). Marx acknowledges that the increase in the bourgeois production was indeed a leeway to their downfall as the triumph of the proletariats remained unavoidable. The Proletariats and Communists In the next chapter, Marx continues to explore the society by analyzing the relationship between the Proletariats an ...Download file to see next pagesRead More