Nobody downloaded yet

World history. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In 1848, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels together wrote the book, “The Communist Manifesto” which is often thought to one of the most powerful political manuscripts in modern world. It is said that the “Communist Manifesto” is the Bible of the communists…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
World history. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"World history. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto"

Download file to see previous pages In the ‘Manifesto’, Marx and Engels have made an effort to evaluate the history of human society according to the ‘mode of production and labor’. They argue that modern society is based on the latest mode of production. Meanwhile, they further envisage that, according to the ‘mode of production’, socialism (or communism) is next to Capitalism which is supposed to exploit labor by alienating from the production. In fact, the political dimension of communism is essentially the result of its response to the capitalists’ exploitation. Marx and Engels argue that the proletariats (or working class people) should unite themselves to accelerate the transition of human society from capitalism to socialism. But though Marx and Engel’s concept of ‘class struggle’ is persuasive enough to explain the changes human society’s activities, these authors have failed to understand that a theory which is, indeed, meant for explaining the economic changes in human society, is not sufficient to bring a radical political change in a country or a society. At best, a theory, like Marxism, can predict the oncoming changes in a society; but there must be exception. In the preface of “Communist Manifesto”, Engels claims that the text is “essentially Marx's work” and that “the basic thought... belongs solely and exclusively to Marx” (Marx and Engels 23). In fact, Marx’s theory of class-conflict constitutes the premise of the “Manifesto”. Depending on the Class-struggle theory, Marx explores the heart of Capitalism. In the very beginning of “Communist Manifesto”, Marx and Engels claim that human history is basically “the history of class struggles” (Marx and Engels 34). They argue that there are generally two conflicting parties in this struggle. This conflict is determined of the mode of labor, which is, indeed, a relationship between the laborer and the production. In this regard, these authors assert that “Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another” (Marx and Engels 43). They further argue that this class war always ends “either in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes” (Marx and Engels 43). According their claim, capitalism is the penultimate stage, of human society, which itself has resulted from the dissolution of the former feudalist social order through the conflict between the feudal lords and their subjects. Even the struggle between the bourgeois class and the proletariats will dissolve the capitalist society into a classless society where class-conflict will not exist. In the first chapter of the “Manifesto”, Marx and Engels say that in a capitalist society, the bourgeoisies are amorally profit-oriented; they maneuver both social and political institutions in order to exploit the proletariats’ labor and to accumulate wealth, as Marx and Engels note in this regard, “The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations...for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation” (Marx and Engels 67). It is evident that Marx and Engels have successfully explored the heart of a society’s economic system and its role in as a determinant sociopolitical power structure in a society. Yet some of Marx and Engels’s claims are quite problematic. They take it for granted that the proletariats are exploited and the bourgeoisies are the exploiting owners of a capitalist soci ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“World history. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(World History. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto Essay)
“World History. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
The Communist Manifesto
He presents his suppositions about the operation of the society and politics. According to the authors, rising industrial workers exploitation will ultimately lead to a revolution under which capitalism is overturned. Marx’s theories about the society and politics reflect on the difficulties faced be industrial workers, who lived in abject poverty and worked in awful conditions with minimal political representation.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Communist manifesto
Communist manifesto Your name Course Instructor Date Communist manifesto Industrial Revolution and the rise of various socialist movements in Europe in the early 19th century Studies have shown that powerful and populous European monarchy during the political revolutions in North American colonies of Britain ignited a variety of revolutionary movements in Latin America, Haiti, and Europe in initiating seemingly and profound irreversible effects on western society.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
The Communist Manifesto
Name Instructor’s Name Course Date of Submission The Communist Manifesto The class system has become deeply embedded in our society and the society has been divided into different segments due to this system. The gap between the elite class and the working class keeps on increasing.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto
Marx has presented extensive argument for his stance and against the existing social structure that he strive to change and uproot in order to establish a society that was free from the strains and shackles of workmanship, bondage, and capitalism (Marx). Although the Manifesto covers a lot of topics in great depth, a complete analysis of the book is beyond the scope of this paper.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Book critque on Karl Marx's Communist manifesto
Indeed if communism or socialism is considered as a social theory, explaining the course of the evolution of human society as well as human history from a more or less contented viewpoint, the mode of production and the labor put into it, the Communist Manifesto can be accepted as the political guidance for those who are involved in the production system of the modern capitalist society.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The Communist Manifesto
The manifesto portrayed capitalism as an obstacle to further development, but it led to social democratic parties as capitalists bought some of the working class
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Communist Manifesto
No matter where you are, the computer and internet make the world as small as your own neighborhood. In the years that Marx developed his theory there was a local industry that grew rapidly. Marx could not have known that the changes of industrialization would be world wide and wide brand 100 years later.
8 Pages(2000 words)Scholarship Essay
The communist Manifesto
With market expansion, mercantilism paved the way for capitalism. However, with all its virtues, capitalism gave rise to inequality of income and wealth, resulting in inequality of economic and political power. The conflict between the bourgeoisies and proletariat worried many thinkers.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
The Communist Manifesto essay
In that perspective, as per Marx, the rise of the contemporary bourgeois society is not a novelty or a ground breaking change, but rather the sprouting of a new system endowed with all the ills inherent in the previous feudalistic or class based societies.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Critical Review of The Communist Manifesto
Thus, we can find in most libraries perspectives like Marxist sociology. On the other hand, we have works such as those by Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, both of whom have sociological perspectives that compete with and contradict Marxist perspectives. Another possible way of viewing the matter is that the ideas of Weber and Durkheim are sociological thought while the ideas of Marx are basically ideology not sociology.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic World history. A Critical Analysis of The Communist Manifesto for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us