Free

Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Party..Page 180-194 - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name: Course: Tutor: Date: A Critical Effort to View Modern Individuals through Max’s Weber’s Theory of Social Stratification Max Weber’s theory of Social Stratification can significantly define modern individuals’ position in post-industrial modern society…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.4% of users find it useful
Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Party..Page 180-194
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Party..Page 180-194"

A Critical Effort to View Modern Individuals through Max’s Weber’s Theory of Social Stratification Max Weber’s theory of Social Stratification can significantly define modern individuals’ position in post-industrial modern society. Among the influential sociological thinkers including Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim, Weber’s concept of class division appears to be the most pertinent to define modern individuals’ existence in the society. Whereas Marx and Durkheim have heavily relied on an individual’s capital and his ability to monetize his labor to explain his class-status, Weber is not willing enough to rely on an individual’s ability to monetize labor and his possession of wealth only. In fact, Marx’s and Durkheim’s exclusive reliance on labor and wealth as the sole factors of social class have failed them to explain the distribution of power, a term which Weber uses to refer to the “chance of a man or a number of men to realize their will in a communal action even against the resistance of others” (Weber, 1968, p. 180). Marxian sociologists believe that power solely derives from a person’s economic power. But on the contrary, Weber holds the view that economic power (in Weber’s words, “economically conditioned power) is a derivative of power which itself derives from the interplay among a person’s or a group of persons’ ‘class, status and party’. I think, Weber’s ‘three components theory’ of Social stratifications is well efficient to explain individuals’ position in post industrial modern society. It is remarkable that ‘increasing divisions of labor’, the subsequent ‘differentiation in social role’ and the ‘specializations of social functions’ are three unanimously acknowledged factors which induced modernization and the rise of the individual, as Filloux (1993) says, “Since modern society is based on growing industrialization and increasing division of labour, the result is a greater degree of differentiation in social roles, the specialization of social functions and, eventually, a risk that ‘social solidarity’ will disintegrate” (p.5) The shift in the mode of labor initiated the change in the social structure as well as individual’s anomic state. Furthermore, the materialization of new collective labor-based identity have a tendency to be translated into new representative institution on the condition that these representative institutions must be relate to the social needs of the new class. But this labor-based social orientation of an individual is not able to define individuals’ racial status, ethnic status and democratic power, and its power derivatives. More obviously such orientation also fails to explain the power of a group of individuals in a democratic political system. Even the capitalist in democratic political system do not enjoy the scope of exerting direct power, as the Marxian scholars claim it to be so. But Weber’s willingness to view “class, status and parties” as “phenomena of the distribution of power within a community” necessarily entails that an individual is a unitary function of a class, a status group and a party, which are superimposed with an overall balance of power. Though this unitary function of power subconsciously within its class and status group, it actively participates in a party to accumulate power to reach their end. In order to understand my appliance of Weber’s social stratification theory in defining the individuals’ orientation in modern democratic capitalist society, it is necessary to have a clear idea of Weber’s terminologies such as “class”, “status group” and “party”. According to Weber, a class is not a community; rather it is a group of individuals who share the same frequent communal actions. His concept of class is mostly economic in nature and determined by the commonalities of a group of people’s economic struggles and actions, as he says, “[Class] is the most elemental economic fact that the way in which the disposition over material property is distributed among a plurality of people, meeting competitively in the market for the purpose of exchange…” (Weber, 1968, p. 181) For example, the middle class people are those who belong to intermediary income-earning group and share a communal pattern of the possession of property and wealth, as Timothy Shortell (n.d.) says, “The possession of property defines the main class difference, according to Weber” (pars. 8). According to Weber’s concept, there are other classes too such as working class, proletariats, etc. In contrast to a class’s position in the economic order, a status group belongs to a social order. In this regard, Weber says, “Both propertied and propertyless people can belong to the same status group” (Weber, 1968, p. 187). This proposition of Weber necessarily defines an individual’s, whether he is a man of wealth or not, political power in democratic political system. Since an individual’s political power in the democratic political system is determined by the class interest of his class to a great extent, he or she can be crowned with the mandatory representative power of that particular class which he or she belongs to. Weber’s social stratification theory is more eloquent in defining the individual’s existence in modern democratic and capitalist society than Marx’s and Durkheim’s labor-based social orientation of individuals. His concepts of ‘classes and ‘status group’ successfully define an individual’s superimposed inheritance to both a class and a social status. In post industrial society, democracy can be considered as the direct consequence of the rise of individualism which itself is the result of increasing division of labor. Labor-based orientation is not sufficient to define the individuals’ position and its power derivatives in the society. Weber asserts that simultaneously as well as subconsciously a person can belong to several class and status groups. But he actively participates in a party in order to achieve goals. References Filloux, J. (1993). “Emile Durkheim”, UNESCO: International Bureau of Education, vol. 23, no.1/2, p. 303–320. Shortell, T. (n.d.). “Weber's Theory of Social Class”, Department of Sociology, Brooklyn College, CUNY. Retrieved 18th October, 2013 from http://www.brooklynsoc.org/courses/43.1/weber.html Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, New York, Bedminster Press, 1968. HM57 W342 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1488321-max-weber-in-from-max-weber
(Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Essay)
https://studentshare.org/sociology/1488321-max-weber-in-from-max-weber.
“Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1488321-max-weber-in-from-max-weber.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Party..Page 180-194

Max Weber the sociologist

..., and his statute as an intellectual, sensitive to the arguments of the Romantic anti-capitalist Zivilisationskritik so influential among the German academic mandarins at the beginning of the 20th century” (Lowy, 2007). This split bourgeois/intellectual perspective did not reckon with the struggle of the Proletariat, as did Marx, or concern itself with the cynical exploitation of the under classes by those who wielded “status” and “power.” And though he came to decry imperial Germany’s expansionist policies, Weber avoided addressing the plight of Max Weber 9 indigenous populations, which were often victimized by Imperialism and who...
9 Pages(2250 words)Research Paper

Max Weber Research Paper

...traditional authority, enough resistance to a leader can lead to a traditional revolution. The movement towards rational-legal structure of leadership using a bureaucratic formation becomes inevitable in the end (Ritzer, 2009). Social Stratification Weber developed the three-component theory of stratification. The basic elements, according to Weber, are social class, social status, and political party. Weber formulated a multifaceted approach to social stratification that portrays the relationship among prestige, wealth, and power. According to Weber, social class is based on...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

The theory of Max Weber

...of management as described by Taylor greatly helps in creating authority and legitimacy. Organizations are headed by leaders who are expected to apply science in managing the employees. On the other hand, employees should follow the instructions of the managers in order to create order in the organization. In this case, a connection is therefore seen between the works of Taylor on scientific management and the concept of authority as explained by Max Weber. The essence of the theories is to ensure that there is proper authority in an organization and each party has a role to play in that authority (Taylor, 77). The Hawthorne experiments were certainly an important step in the study of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Max Weber

...? Max Weber on Capitalism and its foundations Part Max Weber’s views on capitalism are expressed through the “protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism” and his other writings, which cover the relationship between the ethical values of ascetic Protestantism and the rise of capitalism. Weber presents the idea that the ideas of different religious groups, particularly the Calvinists, contributed to the emergence of the capitalistic spirit (Kennedy, 2004). He postulated that there was a relationship between being a protestant and engaging in business, therefore reached the conclusion that religion was a potential cause for the development of the capitalistic society. Max argued that the capitalist saw profit as an end on its own... was...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Max Weber

...Max Weber Max Weber, the of numerous books about sociology of religion greatly focused on the role of religion in modern society since played a great function in historic and autonomous development of the modern economic ethic. Significantly, religion according to Weber constitutes modern process and features of power relations, social and political administration, socio-economic structures, social status and stratification, and others. For instance, Catholic doctrine as formulated by Aquinas differs from earliest Christianity and Stoicism in the viewpoint concerning equality of all human beings. This doctrine greatly...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Max Weber

...Order 112427 Max Weber - linkage between bureaucratic structure and human agency One of Max Weber's most renowned and famous works was written inthe year 1904 to 1905, and was entitled 'The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism'. Max Weber is known to have put forth the argument, in this work that 'Capitalism' as such must have developed historically, as a result of a so called 'religious movement', known as 'Protestantism', also known as Calvinism'. Calvinism, as Weber stated, believed in the doctrine of 'predestination', that is, in other words, in the notion that it was in fact God who decreed and decided on the eternal damnation of some persons, and the eternal salvation of some others, and these major decisions would... ...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Max Weber on Democracy

.... This is likely one of the reasons why Weber's outlook was so negative upon democracy. Weber felt that since sociologists are human beings possessed with the capability of having empathy and understanding for others, that social actions should be analyzed accordingly. Weber, unlike Marx and Durkheim really focused on the individual and not society as a whole. He focused on status, individual ideas, social class and religion in evaluating their impact on democracy. Weber felt that each of these facets had an individual and equally compelling effect upon the individual and therefore their perceived place in a democratic society. ...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Sociology of Max Weber

...control over symbolic force Because these dimensions are relatively autonomous, the history of any given society is a complex and unstable struggle between various classes or strata to dominate these fields of power, and where possible to combine and to consolidate these dimensions into a single ensemble of power relationsWeber's views on the importance of a strong German state and an effective German economy were developed in some detail in his Freiburg inaugural address of 1895 (Tribe 1989a), where he criticized the cosmopolitanism of Manchester economics and argued that political economy had to be German political economy. Furthermore, economic expansion required political...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Max Weber

...of individuals and increased rationalization of human life traps. Politicians and entrepreneurs are needed in the system to counteract bureaucrats. Social stratification Weber developed a theory of stratification which had three components which are theoretically different elements: social class, social status and political part. Where social class relates to the economical factors to the market and includes owner, renter, and employees while status class deals with non-economical qualities like honor. Finally, party class is based on association in a political platform. The consequences of these three...
16 Pages(4000 words)Research Paper

Max Weber

...and efficiency meant doing something in the most direct way or quickest respectively (“Theories”, 2015). Weber had a significant impact on sociology by coming up with various theories. The theory of verstehen or better known as empathetic understanding, which resulted to the symbolic interactionism in what was fondly called the perspective of interpretive sociology. He enhanced the understanding of the basis of social imbalance. He is also credited with the development of the methodological concept. He further proposed the study of large-scale social processes such as the rise of bureaucratization and importance of rationalisation in the western nations (“Theories”, 2015). Weber’s main theory was of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Max Weber in From Max Weber part2: Power VII: Class, Status, Party..Page 180-194 for FREE!

Contact Us