'Beyond Black and White: Essentialism, Hybridity and Indigeneity' by Yin Paridies - Admission/Application Essay Example

Article review The main article “Beyond black and white: Essentialism, hybridity and indigeneity” by Yin Paridies talks about indigenous identity in Australia which is a fixation since early colonization days. During the past in order to determine, the indignity of an Australian individual focus was put on control of mobility, socialization as well as biological reproduction (Paradies, 2006). The article also highlights the many different types of human identity based on ethnicity, race, age, sexuality, gender, language, class, physicality profession as well as religion.

Paridies talks about the different indigenous people located in Australia and how there has been debates regarding the indigenous identity. The author also talks a little about his race which is Aboriginal-Anglo-Asian Australian whereby he considers himself both white and Asian. However, he continues to mention that he is unable to speak the Aboriginal language and he is not connected to his ancestral lands. Paridies tells the reader of the suffering that indigenous people have gone through due to discrimination, marginalization, and more so exclusion that exists even today (Paradies, 2006).

When comparing the original article Paridies, Yin 'Beyond Black and White: Essentialism, Hybridity and Indigeneity', with the other three academic articles citing it, it is easy to see that despite the fact that they have almost the same message there are slight differences in how they convey their message. In the first article by Daryl Adair and David Rowe “Beyond boundaries? ‘Race’ ethnicity and identity in sport”, the authors enlighten the readers about sport and societal structures, values, narratives, norms in the basis if ethno-racial studies.

It continues to talk about the ethnicity and its relation with ancestry (Adair & Rowe, 2010). The article is written in a different manner from the main article however, the authors highlight about Paridies topic, which is indigenous Australians. The second article by Mel Gray and John Coates “indigenization and knowledge development: Extending the debate”, also talks about indigenization however differently from Paridies. Reason being as Paridies talks about indigenization in Australia, this article generalizes it and talks about indigenization around the world (Gray & Coates, 2010).

The third article, by Val Colic-Peisker and Farisa Tilbury “Being black in Australia: a case study of intergroup relations” highlights about the race relations in Australia in regards to the tensions existing between African refugees and Aborigines (Peisker & Tilbury, 2008). Paridies article is used in this article in that his information regarding Australian indigenous people is mentioned. All the three articles treat Paridies article as an important contribution to the field in that they use some of its information to add on to their article.

They mostly include the information about the indigenous Australia that Paridies has highlighted in his article. Nevertheless, they do not discuss it in a substantive way since they have their own main topics they are dealing with. For example, the first article is talking about sports and how it has influenced indigenous cultures and how it helps people come together. My opinion of the role played by Paridies article is that it acts as a supplement to the other articles. It does this by giving some of the vital information the other authors need to write their article.

They may be mentioned in passing by the authors since they regard it as an imperative tool. From observation, I can say that academic articles seem to use each other in terms of gathering information that is factual and the other authors including it in their own articles in order to make it rich. This is why scholars prefer academic articles as opposed to other online articles. References Paradies, Y. (2006) 'Beyond Black and White: Essentialism, Hybridity and Indigeneity', Journal of Sociology 42: 355-367 Adair, D & Rowe, D. (2010). Beyond boundaries?

‘Race’, ethnicity and identity in sport’ International review for the sociology of sport 45:251 Gray, M & Coates, J. (2010). ‘Indigenization and knowledge development: Extending the debate. International social work 53.613 Peisker, V.C & Tilbury, F. (2008). Being black in Australia: a case study of intergroup relations. Journal of Race Class. 49:38