The basic motive of this essay "Life without Death: A State of Perpetual Nothingness" shows the world in which death is no longer a factor, problems emerge that replace the issue of death with the issue of unfettered life. Moreover, the paper will analyze some works of art that affect the same topic…
Download file to see previous pages...
Saramago writes about a world in which people no longer are burdened with death. The burden is reversed to be centered with on-going life which becomes a problem in a world where death is no longer an issue but growing old, illness, and injury all still impact life. The Catholic Church becomes wary of this event, believing that if there is no death then there is no resurrection, thus negating the premise upon which the Church was built. This gift of immortality comes at a high cost as those who would have died to linger, the idea of aging becomes a more fearful state, and the question of what to do about the birth of children is contemplated. The solution to the burden of life is to once more seek out a way to find death (Saramago & Costa, 2009). Everlasting life has been the domain of the Church since its beginnings. The premise of the death of Christ overriding the burden of sin and then to be given over to resurrection so that those sins can be forgiven has been the primary focus of the Church. If everlasting life comes through some other means, this would threaten the Church and Saramago write about this concept in his novel. St. Augustine writes about death and offers up some reasons why continued life would not be in the interests of human existence. He states that “every soul is wretched that is bound in the affection of mortal things”. In other words, when bound to the mortal body, transcendence is not possible. Without the hope of the afterlife, there is nothing but the continuation of the turmoil of life....
St. Augustine writes about death and offers up some reasons why continued life would not be in the interests of human existence. He states that “every soul is wretched that is bound in affection of mortal things” (Levenson & Westphal, 2002, p. 24). In other words, when bound to the mortal body, transcendence is not possible. Without the hope of the afterlife, there is nothing but the continuation of the turmoil of life. What is life without the resolution of death? The afterlife becomes immaterial, so the concept of sin is no longer relevant to the operation of daily life. The question can become centered on the idea of sin as it relates to social interaction. Would people generally still behave in a social manner or would they disintegrate into anti-social behaviors, free from the burdens of hell and purgatory that often are the barriers to acting on impulses that are not within the social welfare of the state. Hanh (2002) discusses life through the metaphor of the flame. As each flame is replaced repeatedly, it is never the same flame that it was when it was first sparked. He says “It may appear to be the same flame, but it is only our perception. In fact there are multitudes of flames succeeding one another in every instant. They give the impression that it is always the same flame, but it is not” (Hanh, 2002, p. 74). One is never the same from moment to moment, each second revealing something new and providing a very slightly changed context. Without death in that future, the changes might become stagnated, the flicker of the flame no longer symbolizing what is natural but becoming something foreign and unnatural. The difference could be seen in the comparison between the flame and a LED light that acts as
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Life without Death: A State of Perpetual Nothingness Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/sociology/1464750-life-death
(Life Without Death: A State of Perpetual Nothingness Essay)
“Life Without Death: A State of Perpetual Nothingness Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/sociology/1464750-life-death.
Majority of the Americans support death penalty since they believe that death penalty is the only suitable punishment which may prevent people from engage in serious crimes. On the other hand many others believe that taking the life of another person under any circumstances is unethical and unsuited for a civilized society.
Both got supporting facts, consequences, differences etc. But different people including jurists & general public have different opinion on the subject matter. People prefer one of the aforesaid forms of punishment to another. However, in order to prefer one to another one has to go through a thorough analysis of these two forms of punishment, the objective that this two forms of punishment are seeking to achieve, the supporting facts in each case, the differences between the two, comparison of the two forms of punitive alternative in juxtaposition etc.
Life and Death. When I joined the philosophy class, my perceptions on life and death were full of ambiguity. On one side, I had the tendency to believe that humans are just animal like entities and not at all different from other animals. On the other hand, I also felt that humans are selected creatures and life is the mysterious indwelling of the invisible soul in the visible body or soul-home.
Several studies have been conducted on the justice of God on the good and evil occurring on the earth impacting the lives of the human beings. The death of Jesus reflects an inhuman behavior of the religious society, yet forgiveness showed its path in the way.
He has earned his fame as “the father of mathematics” (Hasan 1), but he has been equally celebrated as a philosopher, engineer, physicist, astronomer, and inventor. Jaeger in her research “Archimedes and the Roman Imagination”, compares Archimedes to Albert Einstein, stating he was “a symbol of intellect” known and respected by many and understood by few (Jaeger 7).
There exists many believes of immortality also known as life after death. Persons are believed to survive death and remain in a conscious mind after receiving some rewards and punishments. Christians believe in life after death and that their members go either to heaven, purgatory or to hell according to one’s morals.
In order to ascertain that life imprisonment is the best alternative to death penalty, it is best to assess the merits and demerits of both forms of punishment and their impact to the society. Death sentence holds plenty of moral controversy owing to the taking of another’s life.
In order for the individual to awaken to his or her own life, it is often the fear of death that will evoke the need to engage in the world around them in a more meaningful way. Death is a mystery that plagues most people as they search for both meaning in the death of others and relief from their own imaginings of what the experience of death will be like once they pass to the next life.
When the spirit is trapped in the physical body, it is considered a materialistic phase and after the death of the body, the spirit attains freedom and goes on to lead a permanent life. The Christian faith puts forth this ideology of life after death, as a means to attaining salvation.
The nature of death is that it is both feared and suppressed so that the individual lives without its burden. When that burden is taken away, the gap creates problems through which life continues similarly to how it was lived before immortality became an issue. It is the nature of human existence to manage the burdens of life
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Life without Death: A State of Perpetual Nothingness for FREE!