We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

On Famine, Affluence and Morality - Essay Example

Comments (0)
The following essay under the title "On Famine, Affluence, and Morality" concerns the article written by Peter Singer that points out the solution to famine is the moral obligation of the wealthy to donate a portion of their belongings to the poor…
Download full paper
On Famine, Affluence and Morality
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
On Famine, Affluence and Morality

Download file to see previous pages... Despite the seemingly well-intentioned solution that Singer proposes in his essay article, there are three counter arguments against his point of view. One criticism is that the proposition of Singer is found to be too radical to the current moral standing of society today. Society today would rather outright condemn people who break the moral norms than a state of moral wrong. Singer argues that such moral standing should not to be a justification to not look beyond one’s own social problems and to be concerned with the moral problems. The matter falls that societies which have more than enough wealth do nothing to help populations which are in abject poverty while knowing something can be done to remedy it.The second objection to Singer’s proposition is that there should be a clear distinction between the act of helping the poor as either charity or duty. This is where the problem of Utilitarianism as a consequentialist form of ethics lies. Alexander and Moore (2007) observed that “according to critics, for consequentialists, there is no realm of moral permissions, no realm of going beyond one's moral duty (supererogation), no realm of moral indifference, and all acts are seemingly either required or forbidden”. It would be viewed as ethically problematic to force the wealthy individuals to give up some of their wealth against their will, regardless how noble the intentions are. However, Singer argues that an individual should always to do whatever would avert the greatest amount of bad. from happening, unless one could only prevent this bad by doing something that is wrong in itself. Singer does not suggest that a person can put off people from hunger but only by murder or theft, he or she should do so. Singer does not go to the length to assert any moral standards as absolutely right and obligatory but merely sets the issue of doing wrong that good may result from it. The last objection to Singer’s proposition in his essay article is the problem on how much should the wealthier people of society give away to those very much less fortunate. It would seem rather unfair that even though some people are wealthy, they would lose a significant portion to those who are in serious lack. What Singer suggests is that those with ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Famine, Affluence and Morality by Peter Singer
The situation he describes is one that could be told forty years later in the same words and same context, which is to state that little has changed in bridging the gap between the world’s poorest people and the richest societies economically, or even with regard to the most basic aspects of standard of living such as adequate food, shelter, and health care.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
Even though people are born in different countries and speak different languages, they belong to one race and that is ‘humanity.’ If you have a relative or a friend who is suffering from starvation, then you will definitely help him by providing food as long as you have enough resources.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
The article seems to suggest that we are responsible for the woes that have befallen the poor and the refugees in the camps. Peter Singer is therefore suggesting that it should be our responsibility and an obligation to get those entangled in unfortunate circumstances out of it (Singer, 1972).
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Morality Analysis
He has numerous assumptions in his essay, which apparently discusses humanity’s duty to help starving people in countries that need help the most. Among his assumptions include our duty to prevent what is bad, and promote what is good. He elaborates this contention by explaining that if we, humans, have the capacity to help other people who are in need without sacrificing some things that are equally important and significant to our lives, then by all means, we are ought to do so.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Pick a stance on the rights of animals based on Peter Singer's article Famine
The core thesis of Singer’s work is hinged on four suppositions: (1) "Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (2) "If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, then we ought, morally, to do it", (3) "It makes no moral difference whether the person I can help is a neighbor's child ten yards from me or a Bengali whose name I shall never know, ten thousand miles away", and (4) "The principle makes no distinction between cases in which I am the only person who could possibly do anything and cases in which I am just one among millions in the same position".
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
In third world countries, adequate services and infrastructure are not readily available. Disaster response is also limited, reducing the countries’ ability to provide for its people. Contributing towards these eventualities is considered charity, which means the voluntary diversion of funds towards such assistance.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
The viewing public also believes that by contributing money and food that it can stop the suffering and save the children. In fact, these assumptions are only partially correct. The causes of famine are far more complex than simply the weather or temporary natural conditions.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
The intention of this paper is to examine famine as a natural calamity, providing a functional description. In addition to this, this paper will discuss the likelihood of famine occurance, and the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Peter Singer - Famine Affluence, And Morality
According to the paper, Peter believes that affluent people who reside in the developed world who have at their disposal enormous wealth have a moral obligation to donate some of their enormous wealth and resources to numerous poor people living in the third world countries. This sole aim of the paper is derived from two principles.
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
As the paper stresses civil wars are mostly caused by political indifferences where different groups support leaders with different ideologies, which cause conflicts. Most people died due to lack of food and shelter for their families as well as the lack of medical care from the kind of dangers they were exposed. 
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic On Famine, Affluence and Morality for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us