StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Morality Analysis - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” is another point of view of utilitarianism as a philosophical theory or can be considered a relative of the utilitarian concept. Among his assumptions include our duty to prevent what is bad, and promote what is good…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.1% of users find it useful
Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Morality Analysis
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Morality Analysis"

of Learning: Famine, Affluence, and Morality Key Assumptions Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” is another point of view of utilitarianism as a philosophical theory or can be considered a relative of the utilitarian concept. He has numerous assumptions in his essay, which apparently discusses humanity’s duty to help starving people in countries that need help the most. Among his assumptions include our duty to prevent what is bad, and promote what is good. He elaborates this contention by explaining that if we, humans, have the capacity to help other people who are in need without sacrificing some things that are equally important and significant to our lives, then by all means, we are ought to do so. In the fifth paragraph, Singer emphasized that helping starving people is a moral obligation by people, but granted that it does not sacrifice anything that is “comparably” important. For instance, if by donating a hundred dollars in a foundation that feeds starving children and families in Africa would cost the life of your child who also needs the money for her operation, then one will be spared of guilt by keeping the money for his child’s operation instead. In other words, if a person acknowledges he or she can feed a single family in Africa by donating his money allotted for a fancy smart phone, then his action is morally justifiable and is fulfillment of duty. Another important assumption in Singer’s essay follows that proximity and distance are also factors in extending our moral duties to our fellow humans despite the fact that other people around us are not feeling obliged to do so. He emphasized that numbers cannot be used as a plausible excuse for not helping other people who are badly in need because we acknowledge that by donating without considering other people’s interest can actually save a single life or two. Singer’s central premise in his essay is summed up as extending our help to people in dire need, despite our proximity and distance, without sacrificing something that is equally significant. His point was that our morality may somehow explain that it is our moral obligation as human beings living in the same earth to extend our help by not being selfish and materialistic, and not only a show of charitable work because as what he said, people who give to charities are praised, while those who do not are not condemned. In other words, helping starving children, for instance, can well be shown as voluntary and not obligatory. People who choose to buy clothes rather than donating to the children of Africa cannot justify their action because they act in that manner so as to look pleasant and not to protect themselves. The Analogy The last sentence of the fifth paragraph tells us an analogy about a drowning child in a pond and a person happens to witness the child drowning. Singer’s analogy fits perfectly with his main assumption that we ought to help other people in need, despite the inability of other people to see her situation, and without sacrificing something that is comparably significant. Simply saying, in that situation, our clothes do not bear more significance compared to a life that is at risk. In other words, we prevent what is bad (the possible death of the child in the pond) and promote what is good (saving the life of the child). ‘Level of Marginality’ In giving away something to the needy, Singer puts a specific, yet abstract limit as to the amount we are obliged to. He used the phrase “until we reach the level of marginality.” It is like a common version found in the Christian bible that a way to heaven is by abandoning all of one’s properties and wealth and giving them after to the poor. Singer requires “reducing ourselves to the level of marginal utility” (par. 27). In the moderate version of his premise, he does not imply that people ought to live in a level of marginal utility such that their families are likely to suffer in the end, as well. What he stands up for is for people to live only according to their necessities rather than wants. It is a process of gradual reduction of the spirit of consumerism that plagues the middle and upper class societies. People buy what they want and need in an amount more than what they give to starving and helpless fellows. This usual act has been used often by people who are hiding behind the masks of a generous persona. Singer only tries to relate that in order to understand the unfortunate situation of other people, it may seem likely for us to experience how it is to be deprived. However, Singer only wants us to reduce our extreme fascination to things that are of lesser importance compared to the lives that are at risk due to extreme hunger. Praiseworthiness of an Action The latter portion of his essay discusses the praiseworthiness of one’s action that involves the distinction between donating to charities and not donating at all. The society nowadays starts to acknowledge that helping is a moral duty and not merely a display of generosity. However, Singer provides a plausible explanation that giving is a form of charity; hence, it is also not wrong when people do not give at all, or that people who do not donate to charity do not receive condemnation. This can be concretized by saying that donating to the needy is a voluntary action; meaning it is not obligatory and forced that doing the opposite is sanctioned by a social disapproval. Lastly, Singer contends that the world has become smaller; therefore, helping people from the other side of the planet is also possible. However, he believes that as people who live proximal to our needy fellows, we are in a better position to see their needs closer rather than people who live far from them. Our proximity all the more provides us with a valid reason to assist with their needs. It is, however, not an excuse to ignore the situation of poor and starving people farther from us because helping, as an act of morally acceptable act, discriminates no one and no distance. An act of charity is universal in nature. Works Cited Singer, Peter. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1.1 (1972): 229-243. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Essay”, n.d.)
Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1464375-analogy-marginality-and-action-peter-singers-famine-affluence-and-morality-analysis
(Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Essay)
Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1464375-analogy-marginality-and-action-peter-singers-famine-affluence-and-morality-analysis.
“Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1464375-analogy-marginality-and-action-peter-singers-famine-affluence-and-morality-analysis.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Morality Analysis

Famine, Affluence, and Morality

I agree with Singer's point that instead of terming the act of helping famine victim as a ‘charitable act', it should be termed as ‘moral obligation' (Singer 236).... Singer's argument is convincing as he has pointed out to the fact that richer nations have the capacity to reduce the suffering of famine victims in other countries without causing any reduction in the supply of resources to its own people (Singer 229).... He has also stated that at the individual level also, common people have failed to raise their voice to help famine victims (Singer 229)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Famine, Affluence, and Morality

B The most compelling part of singers' argument is the fact that we should prevent something bad from happening without sacrificing something else of same importance (Singer, 1972).... C Despite singers' insightful argument in favor of moral obligation to get rid of hunger in the world, there are also enough reasons not to believe so.... Name: Course: College: Tutor: Date: A The article by peter Singer is very insightful at the same time provoking....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Famine, Affluence, and Morality

Does Singer's “Famine, affluence and morality” Inescapably Commit Us to His Conclusion?... Famine, Affluence, and morality.... Article Review: peter Singer Institution Q1.... Article Review: peter Singer Q1.... In this article, Singer aims to bring the reality of the poverty situation to light....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Singer moral principle. Peter Singer and greatest happiness principle

Peter Singer's article 'Famine, affluence and morality' is an interesting read even though it is difficult to agree totally with his point of view.... Peter Singer's article 'Famine, affluence and morality' is an interesting read even though it is difficult to agree totally with his point of view.... It's good to involve oneself in charity but this does not mean that one should be guilty of one's affluence and lend helping hand to all the social causes even when we are not a part of the society in which help is needed....
7 Pages (1750 words) Book Report/Review

Peter Singer and John Arthur: Analysis of Their Works

Singer says that our morality needs to change along with our lifestyle and only then can we become more ethical people.... According to Singer, the rich and affluent do not respond to famine situations in countries such as Bangladesh where over nine million people were starving because of a failing government, cyclone and failing harvests.... According to the author, people do not donate liberally to such causes nor do they take any extra efforts to increase the awareness in their government to take any action....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Peter Singer - Famine Affluence, And Morality

This would help a great deal in dealing with some of the calamities such as famine and disaster.... hellip; According to the paper, peter believes that affluent people who reside in the developed world who have at their disposal enormous wealth have a moral obligation to donate some of their enormous wealth and resources to numerous poor people living in the third world countries....
4 Pages (1000 words) Assignment

Famine, Affluence, and Morality

This essay, Famine, Affluence, and morality, talks about 'Famine, affluence, and morality' is an article written by Peter Singer that examines how views various emergencies that are either natural or even man-made.... The most recent happened in the year 1971 in East Bengal....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Famine, Affluence, and Morality

This work called "Famine, Affluence, and morality" describes the ideas of the Australian philosopher Peter Singers.... He discussed this point of view in several of his works and particularly in the paper, Famine, Affluence, and morality.... The Australian philosopher, peter singers argued that people's tendency to favor ourselves over those who may be more worthy of our attention is morally indefensible and that sacrificing some things in order to help the needy is necessary in order to live the ideally moral life....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us