We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Apply the Notion of Suthority in the Milgram Experiment to Robespierre and the Reign of Terror - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Summary
Name Institution Course Instructor Date People often find themselves working under coerced situations. This has been a very controversial issue in the society. Some people always find themselves captives of those in authority. An individual poses authority by making rules and regulations and making sure, they are implemented in the society…
Download full paper
GRAB THE BEST PAPER
Apply the Notion of Suthority in the Milgram Experiment to Robespierre and the Reign of Terror
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Apply the Notion of Suthority in the Milgram Experiment to Robespierre and the Reign of Terror

Download file to see previous pages... This aimed at making the students obey whatever they were told by their teachers. However, some students would keep quiet and this resulted to addition of the shock administered to them. This authority posed by the teachers ultimately led to obedience from the students. Psychologist Stanley from his experiment concluded that several people under authority tend to obey out of fear or due to the desire of appearing co-operative despite acting against their desires and own judgment1. This paper discusses in depth Stanley’s argument on authority from his experiment in relation to Robespierre and the reign of terror. The French revolution was one main challenge to the government. In 1790, Maximilien Robespierre attained weird power thus becoming the one of the most fascinating people to pull out of the revolution2. He aimed at putting an end to the revolution. He was the founder of the Reign of Terror, which meant that those who were subject to him lived with fear. This occurred due to the death punishment that was passed to those who opposed his ideas. Being the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, he remorselessly imposed his precise confidence to the French Nation. He executed those who opposed him mercilessly including those close to him. ...
Robespierre argued that the use of terror in his leadership aimed at a good and peaceful Republic. In his policy, he said that the end always justified the means. This explained that terror was nothing but administration of justice and the principle of a dictatorial government. Although terror was his tool against his opponents and those against the revolution, even his supporters felt the need to stop it4. However, according to Stanley’s experiment, they had to obey him against their desires in fear of death. They showed co-operation in everything acting against their way of will. The terror was the beginning of misery to the people. They were deprived of their rights and freedom to do according to their hearts desires. In need of building a peaceful and unite Nation, Robespierre led to an endless bloodshed community5. He was driven by power and greed of authority in ruling the Nation. His mean ways of manipulating people made him strong and full of power earning him courage against his opponents. Those who felt courageous enough to ask for their rights received a death punishment that increased fear among people. This made people experience suffering due to subjected pressure. However, Dalton gave up himself to call upon the end of terror. He did not optimistically succeed in his task sine he was deprived the right of defending himself. He then received a death punishment but left a comment depicting that the freedom of the people was to be attained within a period of thee months. It happened that at the beginning of another purge in 1794, people felt that they had endured a lot. In fear of facing death, members of his Convection rose up and shouted at him before he could even speak6. This motivated other people who rose up to defend their rights. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC
The French Revolution: Impact of the Reign of Terror
The French Revolution: Impact of the Reign of Terror. The French revolution is perhaps one of the most significant events which revolutionized the modern world today. Although the French revolution did to some extend enlighten, signify freedom of speech and equality but it was not without its share of issues.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Why terror
Why Terror? (Name) (Institution) (Course) (Tutor) (Date) Introduction The French revolution has been viewed as one of the most decisive events in modern day Europe1. This is the event that has set up the foundation for the liberation of many other countries under the yoke of despotic monarchs.
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
The experiment that Stanley Milgram conducted in the 1960s provided empirical evidence in favour of what is now referred to as t
While one can presume that in large networks there should be hundreds of steps between two randomly chosen nodes, Milgram discovered that the average shortest path between nodes of a network is only about six steps. That is why the small-world phenomenon is popularised as the “six degrees of separation” effect.
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay
Stanley Milgram
Firstly, the presence of an authoritative figure like the experimenter, in this case, increased the gravity of the situation and forces the participant to comply. Secondly, the fact that the experimenter continuously asked them to continue the experiment must have had an impression that the experiment was important.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Reign of Terror in the French Revolution
From September 5, 1793 to July 28, 1794, France went back to the dark ages as violence, mayhem, rape, genocide, and devastation were showcased to make any civilized person retch in revulsion and everything was supposed to be done in the name of liberty, equality and fraternity.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
The Milgram experiment
Next the code of conduct indicates in section 3.3 and 3.4 ("Ethical Principles", 2003) that the participants should not be harmed in anyway - yet the experimenters went ahead even though they saw that the experiment was causing pain, suffering and nervousness in the participants/teachers ("The Milgram Experiment", n.d.).
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Stanley Milgram
Psychologists and sociologists explore the problem of our susceptibility to social influence, and some results of their explorations often cause to deeply analyze human nature. One of such scientists was Stanley Milgram who had held an experiment. The aim of the experiment was to explore susceptibility to social influence in a particular situation which could show the features of our behaviour in this area.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
The Original Milgram Experiment 1961
In fact, in retrospect, the advantage Milgram had in overlooking the ethical concerns in a way make his study more authentic, considering the subject of the study. 2. Milgram’s methods were ethical because they did not
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Maximilien Robespierre: Justification of the Use of Terror
Generally Robespierre is accredited for catalyzing the French Revolution to its “reign of terror” phase that claimed the lives of anyone eyeing the revolution with suspicion. When Robespierre’s point of view on the revolution is taken into account, it
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Milgram Experiment
The experimenter acting as the authority would probe and insist on the participant to continue administering the shocks to the maximum level despite the cries and pleading of the subject. The participants were deceived about administering
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment
Let us find you another Essay on topic Apply the Notion of Suthority in the Milgram Experiment to Robespierre and the Reign of Terror for FREE!
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us