Milgram and Destructive Obedience - Book Report/Review Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The Holocaust is the term used to describe the planned and executed extermination of Jews from all German controlled and influenced territories. This tragic event in the history of mankind saw the death of a staggering six-million European Jews during World War II staged by the National Socialist party headed by Adolf Hitler…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.6% of users find it useful
Milgram and Destructive Obedience
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Milgram and Destructive Obedience"

Download file to see previous pages Just how could an entire nation commit itself to the killing of their own based on religious differences The general thought was that the Nazi were purely evil but Stanley Milgram and his experiments tell another story. Instead of the purely evil depiction of the Nazi, the command structure provided the setting wherein those in the lower echelons became obedient to the orders given to them. It was not purely a matter of innate hatred that drove the guards at Auschwitz to exterminate their prisoners but a matter of following orders. Milgram's experiments also showed that even ordinary citizens German, American or any other nationalities can become accomplices in a genocidal act due to the authority that they have committed themselves for employment.
In this paper, I will be analyzing Milgram's experiments and its contribution to the understanding of genocide and basically try to find out what drives people to commit wholesale murder. I will also be evaluating other perspectives and comparing it with Milgram's contentions.
Thomas Blass (1991), a rather prolific writer with subjects mostly on Milgram, relates the situation of the Jews in the pre-World War II era. During the summer of 1944, the Nazis, under the direction of Eichmann and with the assistance of their Hungarian allies, were in the process of rounding up the Jews of Budapest and segregating them prior to transporting them in cattle cars to the gas chambers of Auschwitz. Budapest is split by the Danube River into two parts, Buda and Pest. One day during the roundups, a Jewish mother and her two-and-a-half-year-old child were taking the trolley from Pest where they had been visiting relatives, to Buda, where they were currently living in a recently found apartment. Unlike most of her fellow Jews, she believed the unbelievable, deadly rumors about what "resettlement for work in the east" really meant. So rather than remaining in Pest, she obtained forged Christian identity papers and moved to Buda, which had been a largely non-Jewish part of the city. The trolley was crossing the bridge between Buda and Pest when the rhythmic clatter of the trolley-car's wheels was interrupted by the insistent sound of the child's voice: "Mommy," he asked, "why don't I wear a cap like other Jewish boys" This was within earshot of many of the other passengers, which included members of the Nyilas, the Hungarian Nazi militia. With a resourcefulness spawned by desperation, the mother quickly turned to her child and said, "This is our stop," grabbed his hand and got off the trolley- right in the middle of the bridge, quite a distance from their actual destination. Miraculously, no one stopped them.
The question that becomes very important now is why this mother felt threatened by her fellow Hungarians at that moment. If her child had made the same remark before the war she probably would have not taken evasive action. The question, in more general form, is perhaps one the primary psychological puzzles underlying the mass destruction of European Jewry.: What psychological mechanism transformed the average, and presumably normal, citizens of Germany and its allies into people who would carry out or tolerate unimaginable acts of cruelty against their fellow citizens who were Jewish resulting ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Milgram and Destructive Obedience Book Report/Review”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Milgram and Destructive Obedience Book Report/Review)
“Milgram and Destructive Obedience Book Report/Review”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Milgram and Destructive Obedience

The Milgram Experiment

...? The Milgram Experiment Introduction Probably the most well known experiments in psychology the Milgram experiment took place in 1961-1962. Stanley Milgram who was a psychologist at Yale University wanted to study how willing a person is, to obey instructions to perform acts which conflicted with the person’s conscience from an authority figure. Milgram set-up an experiment where he tested the levels of obedience, to a person subjected to painful electric shocks with increasing levels and ordered to punish another person. This experiment brought about disturbing findings, which fascinated and at the same time shocked the scientific community. This...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Stanley Milgram

...Stanley Milgram Stanley Milgram’s social psychology experiment of obedience has become one of the most important ones in the history of psychology. The subjects taken in the experiment as “teachers” were influenced by several factors to obey the experimenter and shock the learner when the learner answered incorrectly. Firstly, the presence of an authoritative figure like the experimenter in this case, increased the gravity of the situation and forces the participant to comply. Secondly, the fact that the experimenter continuously asked them to continue the experiment, by saying things like “it is necessary that you go on” etc must have had an impression that the experiment was important...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Conscious Obedience

...). Milgram noted that among two people, the one who is in the position of social control will assume the right to prescribe the behavior of the other person (Blass 39). In these situations, obedience takes on a new aspect in the form of loss of control. This radical shift in the level of obedience was also noted by Zimbardo, Maslach, and Haney during the often-cited Stanford Prison Experiment of 1971. The researchers set up a mock prison to test the limits that students would go in their role as prison guards. Within a matter of two days, the student guards had assumed a realistic role of a brutal and desensitized prison warden. Zimbardo et al. concluded, "Good people can be induced,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Stanley Milgram

...them to obey authority, and people are inclined to follow different instructions and directions of authority participants: "Findings show that, 'two-thirds of this studies participants fall into the category of 'obedient' subjects, and that they represent ordinary people drawn from the working, managerial, and professional classes (Obedience to Authority)'" (The Milgram Experiment). So, the experiment shows that society and authority influences very much our activity and behaviour. But how has social influence been strong enough in the past to make people conform to falsehoods or capitulate to cruelty There are multiple examples of such influence in the past: Nazi dictatorship in...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Milgram Experiment

...the respondents alter their responses, as human being inherently condition themselves to behave in a certain manner to stimuli. Respondent behavior or operant behavior has widely been studied to reveal that respondents act in a certain way to fit in the expectations following psychological perception of the stimuli. The results obtained in such study must factor in some level of alteration as an assumption since respondent behavior becomes very central to the expected outcomes (McLeod, 2007). The author accounts for a way to deal with the alteration of perceptions using Milgram’s study of obedience where the procedure applied is concealed in form of a deception. McLeod (2007) argues that it is allowed to...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Milgram Experiment

...Milgram Experiment Give a brief of the actual experiment. How was it set up? What were the participants told? Identify the ways that they were deceived. The experiment was set up in separate rooms, where one room hosted the subject (confederate) and a shock generator with switches of between 30 to 450 volts and the other hosted the participant and the experimenter. The participants were to administer shocks in increasing order to the subject for any wrong response. The experimenter acting as the authority would probe and insist on the participant to continue administering the shocks to the maximum level despite the cries and pleading of the subject. The participants were deceived about administering the shocks (they...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment


...Obedience Questions Question Children require directions in most of the issues that they face. They have no past experience or knowledge upon which they can rely on to make decisions. Accordingly, authority figures in the lives of children are the sources of guidance and knowledge. It is therefore very important that children are socialized to obey such figures for their (children’s) good. Question 2: Children are taught to obey authority figures without questioning such obedience - their total obedience is required. Therefore, it is true that, on a face value, children are set on the path to the kind of obedience that is displayed in the Stanley Milgram...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Destructive obedience

...The phrase destructive obedience refers to the idea of a person following the orders considered to be immoral, which later on will cause them a lot of regret and distress. This usually occurs with conformity which basically is the adoption of behaviors and attitudes of others even though they are against a person’s own inclinations. Factors such as prestige or the appearance of authority or power have a direct influence on destructive obedience. Obedience could also occur for instance to a superior officer such as in the military. 2. The following are strategies that may help resist destructive obedience-educating the...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework

Behavioral Study of Obedience

...Research Problem The main reason as to why Milgram came up with this sort of research was in a move to determine how obedience actually worked. In the study, Milgram attempts to find out the rate at which humans obey orders; this is because according to him, many people are forced into complying orders even if they are not willing (Milgram, 1963). During the study, Milgram focuses on the Nazi regime because numerous deaths marred this era. Hence, according to him, although Nazis caused these deaths, most of them had to commit these atrocities by exhibiting utter compliance against their will (Milgram, 1963). This was due to the fear they...
4 Pages(1000 words)Admission/Application Essay

Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiment

...Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiment has been realized in the second half of twentieth century in order to understand the behavior of Germans and their crimes in the period of World War 2 (YouTube, 2012). The principal question of this particular study is considered to be “Were the Germans in fact evil and cold-hearted, or is this a group phenomenon which could happen to anyone, given the right conditions?” (, 2008). There have been three roles in the experiment: the leaner, the experimenter and the subject. The last has been instructed to read a pairs of words to the leaner and if he makes a mistake the subject has to punish the learner by giving him a shock that has been higher in 15 volts for every next mistake... in the...
1 Pages(250 words)Article
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic Milgram and Destructive Obedience for FREE!

Contact Us