Nobody downloaded yet

Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens) - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Critical Review on the Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens) Name University Institution Critical Review on the Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens) Summary Society is a group of people interacting with each other through persistent communication efforts among them…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.2% of users find it useful
Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens)
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens)"

Download file to see previous pages All sociologists agree that a person cannot claim to be completely independent of the society around them though there have been contrasting views on how best to study an individual’s behaviour. In this respect, there is a central debate in sociology over the primacy of human behaviour; the options being structure or agency. Agency is the ability of individuals, who are the basic units of a society, to make decisions and act in accordance to those decisions. On the other hand, structure defines accepted routines in society that dictate how things should be done, effectively limiting the choices and opportunities available for an individual during decision-making. The structure against agency debate is an issue of socialisation against an autonomy where an individual choses either to act in such a way that promotes social ties, or in such a way as to fully express their individuality (Layder, 2005). Context Antony Giddens postulated the structuration theory as an alternative to other widely used theories of sociology that emphasised on agent and structure determinism. These theories include social system dichotomies like subjective-objective, agency-structure, and micro-macro perspectives that give the impression that society is made up of extremes, which are always going against each other to maintain balance. Structuration does not view society in terms of agency or structure but takes a more holistic approach, preferring to consider the practises that hold society together as opposed to society components that do the actions. This way, structuration aims at balancing society and the individual: a concept known as structural dualism, actions result in the social structure and social structure makes these actions possible. By so doing, Giddens proposed that structure and action are dependent on each other and none can exist alone (Baert and Carreira, 2010). The structuration theory has five basic assumptions that Giddens made when giving the postulates for his theory. First, the theory assumes that social activity is not a sum of individual actions and cannot be explained from a totality perspective either. The second assumption states that structure is a sum of all repetitive acts of individual agents. Third, Giddens assumed that social structures are temporary and can always be violated by any agent. The fourth assumption is that social structures are a limiting factor to the actions of individuals within the society. Finally, from all the other assumptions, the theory concludes that the result of the constraint between structure and action is positive evolution. These assumptions may not have been in Giddens mind when he proposed the theory of structuration. However, they do go well with his views and perspective on life, especially as regards the concept of structural dualism (Finlay and Gough, 2003). Discussion Giddens Position on Structure/ Agency Relationship The author stated that for there to be a structure, there must be an agency. Therefore, the idea of society and individual existing as separate entities is not conceivable. A society facilitates the very existence of an individual and natural laws show that a society cannot exist without the individual as explained by the expression duality of structure. The interdependence of the two variables formed the basis upon which Giddens based his theory. Giddens states that societal structures ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens) Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens) Essay)
“Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens) Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens)

Critical Review on the Practical Consciousness as the Constitution of Society based on the agency-structure relationship by Giddens

..., structure is an implicit occurrence of time-space in the creation and re-creation of the social systems. Giddens denotes social systems as “reproduced relations between actors or collectivities, organized as regular social practices.” This principle results to his criticism on the dualism of structure agency. According to Baber (2007, p.222), Giddens contends that dualism does not exist in the relationship of structure and agency; hence, he proposes the duality of structure wherein structure is reconceptualised as the custom’s consequences, which...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

The Agency-Structure Relationship Review

...? The Agency-Structure Relationship Review (Anthony Giddens) (04.01.12) Introduction According to Anthony Giddens (1984, p.236), social life comprises of more than just individual random actions although it is not solely influenced by social forces. Putting it differently, social life is not just a sum of micro level activities and can be studied by searching for and analyzing macro level explanations. Giddens suggested that human agency and social structure are in relationships with one another and that repeating actions by individual agents produces the social structure. He held that social structure comprises of moral codes, institutions, conventions and traditional methods of doing things. Additionally, he also implied... that such...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

The Paramilitary Structure: A Critical Review

...The Paramilitary Structure: A Critical Review (Fill in with your information etc The Paramilitary Structure: A Critical Review When discussing the paramilitary structure used by contemporary American police agencies, there are many factors which must be considered. The origins, evolution, and influence of the paramilitary structure itself are of critical importance, as well as the impact that this organizational structure has on organizational culture, the role the paramilitary structure plays in the defining and delivering of police...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Structure and Agency by Giddens and Bourdieu

...time. Bourdieu was in a mission to reconcile structure and agency. He states that, both structure and agency have equally important roles in making a whole human being (Bourdieu, 2008, p.152). External structures are internalized into habitus, as the actions of agent make the mechanism through which different forms of capital are externalized in a person. Bourdieu is concerned with two issues here; externalizing internal, and internalizing external. On the other hand, Giddens had his view of structure and agency. Giddens developed Structuration Theory. He attempted to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review

Agency costs and ownership structure

...the principals (owners) and agents (managers) entails agency costs that affect firm value, so firm value can be maximised to the extent that principals and agents minimise agency costs. This paper reviews the available literature on the effects of family ownership, public ownership, and the dispersal of ownership on firm performance and value and provides a summary of the status of our knowledge of these relationships. Executive Summary Agency theory explores the effects of ownership structure on the performance of the firm. The theory states that the value of a firm will depend on the extent to which the interests of principals...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Constructivism and Post-Structuralism

... of the structure-agency debate can be traced back to a feeling of discontent about how traditional approaches to international theory have dealt with issues of agency. If pushed to their logical end-point, the two positions amount, respectively, to a structural determinism and an equally farfetched belief in the autonomy of rational actors. Applying Giddens to international theory entails investigating how social structures and state actions mutually influence each other. Such a position rests, in Wendt's words, on the recognition that '(1) human beings and their organisations are purposeful actors whose actions help to reproduce or transform the society in which they live; and (2) that society is made up of social relationships... . 1985....
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Giddens Sociology

...SOCIOLOGY Giddens (1997) in his monumental work Sociology gives acutely interesting views on the human body, eating habits, illness and ageing. He says anorexia that has become a compulsive sickness in industrialized, wealthy countries, is unknown in underdeveloped regions of the world. Till the end of 18th century, rounded female figures like in Ruben’s curvaceous paintings had been appreciated and only in late nineteenth century, the thin and slim female body was coveted ‘as an ideal for most women.’ Anorexia and bulimia go together leading to serious eating disorders and if not clinically and psychologically treated, could lead to starvation and death. 20% of British women, including Princess Diana, at one time or...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Agency Structure

...Agency Structure Task: Agency Structure Introduction The US government executes numerous activities through agencies. The government has different agencies with each agency performing specific roles. An agency may be executive or independent and their structure varies. These agencies operate under different government departments and the government mainly finances their activities. The position of these agencies influences on the country’s budget substantially. This paper, hence, surveys few agencies in the U.S government, spells out...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Structure vs. Agency

...Structure vs. Agency Introduction Sociologists have been addressing the debate on structure versus agency for a long time. Agency advocates for free will whereby an individual can make his or her own choices without external influence. Structure on the other hand describes the prevailing structured plans that are aimed at driving individuals to have limited choices and scarce opportunities. Structure sells the idea of socialism while agency calls for autonomy. The question on which is better has brought heated debates among the renowned sociologists. Sociologists view Various...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Structure and Agency in Revolutionary Theory

...Structure and Agency in Revolutionary Theory Structural theorists postulate that elements responsible for defining human culture should be perceived more in the context of their relationship with a larger all-encompassing structure and system. The theory behind this thinking is referred to as structuralism that seeks to reveal by uncovering the structures upon which the foundation of human thinking, emotions and perception are grounded. Structural theorists believe that human life cannot be defined through the intelligible except of their interaction, but through a variant structure...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Critical Review On The Agency-Structure Relationship (Giddens) for FREE!

Contact Us