Case study: The Threat of Groupthink - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The group decision making can be regarded as a participatory approach in which individuals critically analyze the problem and put forth their opinions concerning the issue. This paper will discuss the threat of groupthink and how the team and project manager can avoid it…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.5% of users find it useful
Case study: The Threat of Groupthink
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Case study: The Threat of Groupthink"

Week 5 Case study: The Threat of Groupthink (Project No: The Threat of Groupthink The group decision making can be regarded as a participatory approach in which individuals critically analyze the problem and put forth their opinions concerning the issue. The process comes to an end as the members of group reach a unanimous opinion. In contrast, there are numerous pitfalls that affect a team in its decision making. Among them ‘groupthink’ is a complex concept which involves “deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgments as a result of group pressures toward conformity of opinion” (Thompson, 2006, p.192). This paper will discuss the threat of groupthink and how the team and project manager can avoid it. Fear of failure When the team members become nervous of the outcomes of their decision they hesitate to reflect their views. As a result, a critical discussion may not take place in the group. Since the group members do not bring fruitful ideas, the project leader is forced to take decisions on the strength of prevailing views. Naturally, the proposed solutions will not be effective, and it fails to generate desired results in the long run. In order to overcome this difficulty, as Thompson suggests, it is better to apply a ‘face-saving mechanism’ for teams which would enable them to assess why the outcomes might turn to be poor (p.176). This procedure involves detailed workshop programs under the supervision of project manager for enlightening the group members regarding essential ingredients of the decision making process. Overestimation of groups Similarly, overestimation of groups is another major symptom of groupthink. Thompson (2006) points out that the explosion of space shuttle Challenger in 1986 can be attributed to overestimation of groups (p.177). In this situation, the group members bear the lethal feeling that they are above the decision making standards and are exempted from all types of mistakes. Since they possess this misbelief, they do not express any interest to reassess discussed points or formulated decisions. Probably, this overconfidence would make their decision an ineffective one. The project manager must take sincere efforts to reshape the team members’ views. In other words, the project manager must invite different perspectives so that members would be prepared to defend their argument (Thompson). This technique would inspire the members to raise their views and thereby it would enable the team to reach a thoughtful decision. According to Janis (as cited in Forsyth, 2009, p. 341) one who proposed the term groupthink for the first time, high cohesiveness is one of the main reasons of this threat; however, it does not mean that groups without cohesiveness always make right decisions. Close-mindedness Groupthink can also be attributed to close-mindedness of the team members. As Schmalenberg (n.d.) comments, this symptom is more prevalent in parliamentary politics where political parties are got affected by groupthink and make bad decisions. Under such circumstances, the group members are bit stereotypical and approach the issue from a specific angle of vision. Since they have predetermined their bases of discussion track, the group members will not be willing to analyze different dimensions of the issue. Therefore, those faulty assumptions would certainly affect the reliability of the decision. Thompson (2006) points out the collapse of Cysco System which according to him, was due to the close-mindedness of the group members. In order to survive this threat, it is better to ‘appoint Devil’s Advocates’ within the group. This practice would make the group decision more fact-oriented and participatory rather than frivolous. Pressure toward uniformity Sometimes, certain social factors may pressure the group members to be unanimous and therefore, they themselves suppress their personal opinions. It would force them to formulate irrelevant decisions which normally become disastrous. Thompson suggests that maintaining ‘a second-chance meeting’ will be the best remedy to overcome this difficulty (p. 178). When there is delay in problem-solving phase, the members’ concepts might change and it would avert the threat of groupthink. Getting hesitant The chance of group think is directly proportional to the size of the group. When the team becomes large, the members are hesitated to express their ideas. From the perspective of Thompson (2006, p. 176), a team with more than 10 members may be affected by this problem; hence, he suggests that reducing the size of the team would be the best alternative to this issue. When the team becomes appropriate in size, almost all members would get involved in the whole processes. Conclusion Groupthink is one of the notable threats to team-making. In order to identify the symptoms of groupthink one should have deep knowledge in the theoretical aspects of team building along with a lot of practical knowledge. However, identifying the symptoms is not the end but only the initial phase of treatment. The strategies to address groupthink involve an array of tactics that would vary according to the intensity and nature of the real problem. References Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group Dynamics. Edn.5. US: Cengage Learning. Thompson, L. (2006). Making the team: A guide for managers. 3rd edition, Prentice Hall. Schmalenberg, G . (n. d.). ‘Groupthink and its impact on business sustainability and decisions’. Sustainability Retrieved 6 Feb 2011 from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Case study: The Threat of Groupthink Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Case Study: The Threat of Groupthink Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Case Study: The Threat of Groupthink Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Case study: The Threat of Groupthink

Decision Making

...? Week 5 Case study: The Threat of Groupthink (Project No: The Threat of Groupthink Introduction Modern organizations promote team work in their business settings in order for enhancing information sharing and problem solving through departmental integration. However, teams regardless of their nature and size often confront with the threat of ‘groupthink’ which leads them to faulty decision making. The threat of groupthink was identified by Irving Janis (1972) who attributed groupthink to group’s extreme cohesiveness and high concern on unanimity. When a...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Learning Journal: Groupthink

..., even though they may have reservations about it. This two-way process of identifying issues and discussing several options as solutions should result in making the right decisions more often than not. Real world examples To elaborate on real work situations to further demonstrate the groupthink concept, I wish to discuss two subsets of groupthink - impression management and Abilene paradox, from the case studies that I came across. Impression management relies on the ability of a person to impress a group with oral presentation, duly backed by statistical or other quotes. There is a positive aspect and a negative aspect to impression management. The person needs to put...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Case study Case Study

...Assignment (Answers in Bold) Part A The following questions were answered based on the case of: Peter Smythe v Vincent Thomas [2007] NSWSC844 (3 August 2007) Available at: Question 1: In what court was the case heard (1 mark) The case was heard in the New South Wales Supreme Court. Question 2: Name the judge and explain his title. (2 marks) The judge is named Rein, and Rein is an administrative judge as evidenced by the title AJ. Question 3: Name the plaintiff and defendant and their counsel. (4 marks) The plaintiff is Peter Smythe and the defendant is Vincent Thomas. The plaintiff's counsel is B. Kasep,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Case studies Case Study

... Paper Question In Roth, the Court refuses to find a protected liberty interest because the plaintiff was "simply not rehired." Does the Court mean to suggest that the plaintiff was not injured by the non-renewal What are the implications of non-renewal for a faculty member's career path P.242 In Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, the Supreme Court held that a non tenured teacher does not have a property interest in his or her teaching position. Likewise, the Supreme Court also found that a public college professor dismissed from an office held under tenure provisions, and college professors and staff members dismissed during the terms of their contracts, have property interests in continued employment. Thus because... Paper...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

Case study Case Study 6

...Case Study 6 – Examining the Role of the Program Goals and Objectives on Evaluation Process With the sample shown for the case of eleven out of seventy smoking participants who quit with no relapse during the evaluation, the smoking cessation approach, while within hours of work, reflects the measure of the feasible extent to which desired results may be achieved and exist with stability in relation to meeting the standards of the program objectives. Since the provision is offered to target an improved quality of life and to extend its length, such goal is to be detected not as a mere end but in the course of each stage at which progress is anticipated (Posavac). The trial period of the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Groupthink During an Emergency

... It is highly possible that the rescue team of fire-fighters did not respond adequately to an emergency situation – when Matthew Buford was attempting to end his life by jumping off the bridge – due to factors that had nothing to do with their ability to save people. The rescue team comprised of individuals who were trained to encounter such and other dangerous situations on a regular basis; and would have the right responses to the situation. They were more likely that the average bystander to know what to do in the given situation; and had the training to do so. Yet, neither did they respond adequately to the presenting problem – the suicide threat – nor to the behaviors of other bystanders - Garrett Couples and the...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment


...contingency plans to use in case they experience failures in their decisions. Groupthink is an event that occurs when the members of a highly solid group give the highest priorities to the harmony of their group (Nijstad, 2009). Their harmony occurs at the expense of the consideration of their choices and opportunities. The conditions that must be present for groupthink to occur are numerous. For this event to occur there should be a high degree of unity within the group, no fair leadership and lack of standards requiring that the group uses certain methodologies. The presence of uniformities in the communal ideologies and backgrounds of the members could also facilitate the occurrence...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Define Groupthink

...GroupthinkGroupthink The term groupthink de s a psychological phenomenon, which affects groups of people that try to make decisions collectively. The groupthink phenomenon occurs within groups or teams that seek to conform or harmonize their decisions, and thus resulting in deviant or incorrect decision-making outcomes. Groupthink occurs when team or group members try to reduce conflict so as to attain consensus without making critical assessment of alternative viewpoints or ideas. The phenomenon is also characterized by the urge to isolate the group or team from outside influences. In groupthink consensus overrides common sense and...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case # 4 A Bullys Threat

...A Bully’s Threat al affiliation A Bully’s Threat Carl has forced the entire school management to launch a ‘manhunt to find him. It might not have been necessary, but his actions contributed to the situation. He was not in class at a vital moment when everyone was looking for him, and no one knew his whereabouts. We see Brian go to the principals office to report a matter that he thinks is a big concern. It evokes the question as to why he only wants to tell the principal. The principal immediately summons Angie to confirm any doubts. It is what makes the principal take urgent actions to inform Brians parents and get advice from his peers in management. It is a manifestation the need of advice from others...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study


... with the challenge. This indicates a failing in their mental capacity. In summation, if one must belong to a group it is best that they align themselves with one that is hardheaded with a softhearted stance. It is however recommendable that one believes and resorts to their individual capacity. References Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.... Individual Vs Group Mentality al Affiliation) In today’s world, group mentality is a common occurrence. People all over the world from different backgrounds prefer this line of thinking and action. The occurrence of group mentality is evident in everyday settings such as school, work, home, and religious centers. What people...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Case study: The Threat of Groupthink for FREE!

Contact Us