Nobody downloaded yet

Uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defence in the O. J. Simpson trial - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defense in the Simpson trial The O.J. Simpson case led to very accurate and reliable appreciation of the weaknesses and strengths of the DNA evidence that was produced against Simpson. The O.J. Simpson case has led to a lot of lessons being learned from the uncertainties over the DNA evidence highlighted in defense in the O.J…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
Uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defence in the O. J. Simpson trial
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defence in the O. J. Simpson trial"

Download file to see previous pages This premise and analysis leads generally to unflattering inferences concerning the intelligence or fairness of the jury of Simpson and more widely to skeptical conclusions concerning the aptitude and capacity of the system of criminal justice, as constituted currently, in order to produce results that are just (Jasanoff, 1998). This paper seeks to highlight the uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defense in the O.J. Simpson case, and argue that the Simpson jury could reasonably infer that the evidence of DNA in the O.J. Simpson case deserved no or little weight. The Account of Prosecution The argument of prosecution was that Simpson cut his hand as he murders the victims and left behind a “trail of blood” in the Bundy scene of crime, into his residence at Rockingham and into his Bronco. As put in the account of prosecution, the blood of the victim was transferred to Bronco since it splattered all over Simpson and had the glove saturated (Simpson carried him and threw him behind the house). The blood of Nicole Brown Simpson was evidently pressed on the sock at the scene of crime; conceivably the bloody hand of Simpson touched his ankle. Simpson perhaps disposed of his clothing to the scene of crime but forgot about the socks in his bedroom as he never realized the socks were stained with the blood of Nicole (Lynch, 1998). The Account of Defense There were several elements in the defense account. Simpson bled in the Bronco and his home. According to the defense, Simpson cut himself accidentally at home in the evening of the crime, may be when trying to retrieve a cell phone from his Bronco, and therefore the drops of his blood were left on his driveway, in the Bronco and the hallway of his home. Later Simpson travelled to Chicago and cut himself again, when he broke a glass in his Chicago hotel room, more seriously when he learned of his ex wife’s death. According to the testimony of Dr. Robert Huizenga, it was established that there were actually two cuts on the left middle and the smaller finger of Simpson, and that a much less conspicuous cut could have led to a sufficient bleeding to account for the quantity of the blood of Simpson found at his residence in Rockingham and in the Bronco (Thompson, 1996). The uncertainties of DNA evidence highlighted by defense The Rockingham glove and Bundy blood drops were contaminated with the DNA of Simpson at the LAPD Laboratory. Collin Yamauchi, the LAPD criminalist admitted that he practically spilled some blood of Simpson from a reference vial as he worked upon the processing of the evidence in the room and that he handled shortly thereafter the cotton swatches with the blood from Bundy drops and the Rockingham glove. The defense team suggested that some blood from Simpson was transferred inadvertently to these evidentiary samples conceivably on the instruments and gloves of Collin Yamauchi (Carbado, 1997). The defense also argued that the DNA of the possible true perpetrator (the person who left the drops of blood) could not be detected from the samples because it was destroyed and degraded as a result of mishandling of the Bundy samples. Collin Yamauchi, the LAPD criminalists swabbed the drops of blood during collection with a wet cotton swatch. These cotton swatches were placed in a plastic bag and for several hours were left in a hot truck. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defence in Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Uncertainties over the DNA Evidence As Highlighted by the Defence in Essay)
“Uncertainties over the DNA Evidence As Highlighted by the Defence in Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defence in the O. J. Simpson trial

The OJ Simpson Trial

...?One of the most celebrated trials in American history is the O.J. Simpson double murder case in 1995. The case had placed celebrity football player and actor, O.J. Simpson in media frenzy for the alleged murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. This most publicized case brought trial by publicity in a whole different level, and brought so much attention on complex issues such as race, gender and status. The trial was held for nine months under Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lance Ito. On October 3, 1995, a twelve-man jury pronounced O.J. Simpson “not guilty”. The...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The OJ Simpson Trial

...jury of twelve had been selected.  The jury consisted of 8 blacks, 2 Hispanics, 1 half-Caucasian, half Native American, and 1 Caucasian female.  Fifteen alternates were selected over the next few weeks. On December 4, Judge Ito announced that the trial would begin January 4 the next year. Trial Proper of Simpson The trial of Simpson was considered to be a huge media event that covers eight months. Not only to the Americans but personalities involved in the crime were exposed in the whole world like Lance Ito,, Kato Kaelin, and his lawyer Johnnie Cochran. The Opening of the trial on January 24, 1995 was so intense that...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

O.J. Simpson Crime Scene Evidence

...of cross-contamination also between the crime scene and the residence of Simpson that was initially not considered as possible crime scene. The failure to get the proper search warrant also invalidated much of the evidence that was gathered. A very crucial piece of evidence like a bloody fingerprint, containing the fingerprint of the probable killer and the DNA itself, were not utilized by the prosecution to the fullest extent as a strong corroborative and direct evidence. Keywords: blood, DNA, Fuhrman, fingerprint, glove, samples, Simpson LAW: O. J. Simpson Crime Scene...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Strategy of Jurors for the OJ Simpson Trial

...& Vannatter, 1997). There were a number of proofs pointing towards OJ Simpson as a murderer such as 911 call and record of Simpson’s hostility towards Nicole, hair evidence, glove evidence, DNA proof and fibre evidence. By considering all these proofs, this could not be denied that OJ Simpson was a murderer. The adopted strategy for winning the case would be presenting proofs before the judge along with witnesses to make the case strong. In addition, witty questions should be asked to make the criminal accept his guilt. References Gilbert, Mike. (2008). How I Helped O.J. Get Away With Murder: The Shocking Inside Story of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

DNA Evidence

The research on DNA evidence started showing significant improvement by the 20th century. DNA evidence became widespread and it became a problem-solving tool for immigration disputes, refining the assay, resolving specimen identity, detecting genetic differences and identifying criminals; thus, the need for DNA identity testing became significant. Historically, DNA evidence began in the forensic field when ABO blood group was used as a system in providing evidence of crime issues. Later, the paternity identification that based on serum protein variation became commonly used. However, it was not until when Jeffrey became a pioneer of DNA based identity testing. DNA evidence became common in federal courts, and the first DNA evidenc...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

An analyst for the Bank of England and you have been asked to analyse and critically evaluate the causes and consequences of the

16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Forensic Science: DNA Evidence

...Payton Quintina Payton Forensic Science: DNA Evidence Like most of other branches of science, forensic science has been rapidly developing during the last century. "DNA analysis promises to be the most important tool for human identification since Francis Galton developed the use of fingerprints for that purpose". (Committee on DNA Forensic Science, 1996). DNA identification is one of the most valuable instruments for the contemporary criminologists. This type of analysis provides a very high probability of tracing the criminal in case at least some genetic material that belongs to him is present on the crime scene. DNA identification...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The Trial: A History, from Socrates to O.J. Simpson

..."The Trial: A History, from Socrates to O.J. Simpson In philosophy there is a single common thread that law originates from the Gods, which is the initial point made in Kadri's The Trial. Whether one believes in God or not the fear of punishment in the name of an all powerful unknown being was set forth to create law and order in society. In the Torah this is most overtly illustrated because its purpose is to set forth the rule of law as commanded by God. The New Testament of Christianity was a progressive move from completely commanding every aspect of the individual's life to allowing rights and freedoms with the hope that humanity was more civilized. Yet, even the words of Christ in...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

DNA Evidence and Procedures

...evidence, then its use may be compromised or even invalidated". Maintaining the integrity of the DNA evidence is vital if it is to have any value in the courtroom. Contamination is the greatest threat to the usability of DNA evidence. DNA evidence runs the risk of being contaminated when DNA from another source comes in contact with the DNA that is relevant to the case. According to National Institute of Justice, "This can happen if someone sneezes or coughs over the evidence, or if the person collecting the evidence touches his/her...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

O. J. Simpson Crimial Trial

...Criminal Trial: Orenthal James Simpson The case of James Simpson was a criminal trial with the defendant being accused of murder. The victims of in this case were the defendant’s ex wife and a man who was a friend of hers. Murder is a crime punishable by life in prison or the death penalty. James Simpson, the defendant, a celebrity, was charged with killing Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown (Eliot, 1995). After a lengthy trial that spanned more than ten months, the accused person was acquitted on grounds that lab scientists had allegedly mishandled the evidence (blood samples) (Eliot, 1995). Another ground for James’...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Uncertainties over the DNA evidence as highlighted by the defence in the O. J. Simpson trial for FREE!

Contact Us