The Separation of Power - Essay Example

Due Section In most governments, not necessarily the USA alone, separation of powers is essential. Powers separation is by three branches: judiciary, legislative, and executive. However, there are complexities associated with governing. For instance, it can be a challenge to come up with a well-built policy action consensus between the legislature and the executive. When President Obama appointed Richard Cordray as a director of the consumer protection agency, many individuals were against his move (Cooper and Steinhauer 1).

This was so because Obama appointed him without seeking the approval of the Senate. According to the provision of the constitution, it is not in order to make such appointments when the lawmakers are in recess. As a result, Obama’s action threatened to trigger a legal challenge that left the republicans fuming that the president was abusing their privilege of recess. In a political rally, the president announced his action and stated that because the senate and the president were all elected, he could waste no time waiting to get the proposal of a minority.

He stated that to avoid delay he went ahead to make his decision. He further stated that he was a protector of middle-class individuals and that Mr. Cordray was his hand-picker. According to legal specialists, the Supreme Court could have an opportunity of reviewing president Obama’s move. The truth of the matter is that senates were in session, but president Obama granted them to recess. Lawyers and democrats stated that the president’s move was right. The republicans, on the other hand, stated that they were okay with Mr.

Cordray, but rather had a problem with Obama’s failure to inform the Senate. This can be complex in situations where even if powers are separated, there exists a superior body that governs the other branches. Section 2 Federalism involves the coordination between the federal and state level. At times, there can emerge variations in the state and the policy capacity even though the state has a significant influence on national policies. Dual federalism evolved between the 18th and 19th centuries, and this included national and state federalism.

In the 20th century, cooperative federalism emerged that involved collaborative policymaking. Between the 1960s and 1970s, new federalism came up that involved grant programs with more discretion from the state (Hakim and Buettner 2). Some of the features associated with federalism include the ability to foster peace by preventing war and associated fears. In addition, it is capable of promoting economic prosperity through internal barriers elimination. It aims at ensuring state organizations as far as social and political order and justice are concerned.

Besides these, there are challenges associated with federalism, which include the fact that it is vital for the involved individuals to share power, and at times, these individuals are not willing. Once power sharing is possible then the distribution of powers in another issue and members may have different proposals. In New York, there has been a significant increase in the number of deaths of developmentally disabled individuals residing in group homes. However, government officials have not made it public.

Only journalists who are investigative have tried their best and made this public. The system failure has significantly contributed to the increasing number of unknown deaths. It is clear that few staff members are employed to take care of disabled residents. Individuals are not willing to separate powers and delegate responsibilities. In most cases, the disabled are left vulnerable to unexpected dangers. This shows that the government has failed by not making it public that the number of deaths of the disabled has been on a rise.

Section 3 PACs refer to political action committees, names given to private groups regardless of the size. This group aims at electing a political candidate and at times takes part in the advancement of legislation. PACs are also meant for playing a significant role in shaping the presidential race of 2012 (Walsh 2). The Supreme Court authorized the super PACs after a discussion known as the united citizens versus the federal electoral commission. The committee members are responsible for contributing so that they can generate enough money necessary for campaigns.

As a result, such groups are capable of spending a lot of money during their campaign. Super PACs have been formed to promote political philosophies and ideologies, despite the fact that some individuals claim that they aim at promoting individuals such as President Obama and Romney's interests. The Supreme Court formed the PACs due to the ruling; this is evident that the Supreme Court has a significant influence on the election. The public according to the needs of the Supreme Court does not know the members of PACs (Krumholz 5).

According to demands by Supreme Court, individuals campaigning should not disclose the names of their donors until a set date. Despite the fact that it is absurd that the disclosure of campaign financiers is not made known to the public, it is essential for people campaigning to uphold the demands of the Supreme Court. This is a sign that the Supreme Court is remarkably powerful as far as the election is concerned. It is a requirement that candidates uphold the requirements of the Supreme Court to avoid violations unnecessarily.

Although most of individuals might wish to know the financers of the aspirants in advance, the Supreme Court does not allow this hence calling for patience among the public (Confessore and Lipton 2).