The Aboriginal Community in Australia - Case Study Example

ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Electronic or manual submission UNIT CODE TITLE NAME OF STUDENT (Print clearly) FAMILY NAME FIRST NAME STUDENT ID NO NAME OF LECTURER DUE DATE Topic of assignment Group or tutorial (if applicable) Course CAMPUS I certify that the attached assignment is my work and that any material drawn from other sources has been acknowledged. This work has not previously been submitted for assessment in any other unit or course. Copyright in assignments remains my property. I grant permission to the University to make copies of assignments for assessment, review, and record keeping purposes. I note that the University reserves the right to check my homework for plagiarism. Should the reproduction of all or part of an assignment be required by the University for any purpose other than those mentioned above, appropriate authorization will be sought from me on the relevant form. OFFICE USE ONLY If handing in an assignment in a paper or other physical form, sign here to indicate that you have read this form, filled it in completely and that you certify as above. Signature Date OR, if submitting this paper electronically as per instructions for the unit, place an ‘X' in the box below to indicate that you have read this form and filled it in completely and that you certify as above. Please include this page in/with your submission. Any automatic responses to this presentation will be sent to your ECU email address. Agreement Date FOR PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES ON LATE ASSIGNMENTS PLEASE refer to the University Admission, Enrolment and Academic Progress Rule 24, and the ECU Course and Unit Delivery and Assessment Policy Table of content. ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................3 UNDERSTANDING THE COMMUNITY....................................................................................3 APPROACHES TO COMMUNITY...............................................................................................6 WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY........................................................................................8 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................10 Reference ......................................................................................................................................12 YouTube Links.............................................................................................................................14 Abstract These works are all about the community. It explains how the community is understood by different personnel, the skills that one must have to successfully collaborate with a community as well as the approaches necessary when working with a community. Executive summary The community is seen as a word with many meanings depending on one’s point of view. Skills required to work with a society include courage, listening, believing the organization, report writing among others. Approaches are diverse which are determined by the understanding of the particular community. Introduction The community is a word whose meaning may never be precise. It is due to the different understanding of the term by various individuals. Its’ meaning is determined by the point of view of the one explaining its’ meaning. Therefore, the situation and the context of a researcher determines the sense of "community." The community at hand is the Aboriginal community in Australia. 1.1 Understanding community On viewing community of a place to explain the meaning, “community is the group of individuals sharing common geographical space, locality, and physical space and interact with one another. These people are almost everything in common. At times they may be of different clans or tribes. When a researcher views the word as a tool of interest, the community can be said to be a group of individuals who are gathered together with a mutual interest. The benefits could be based on politics (the parliament community), social activities (the business runners in a particular market), and spiritual field as well as on the cultural base. The group can be short-lived of stay together for a long while with their interaction either physically or through the variable technological devices On viewing the community a social system, its meaning is based on the various platforms of interaction among individuals within a wide organization or society. In a country, we have people having various disorders. Those within a country having an ordinary disability or disease like obesity, hypertension, obesity, lie in the same category, thus can be defined as a community. Interaction of communities mostly takes place when the members are teaming up together for assigned mission. The teaming together of a community is determined by several elements. They include narratives in a community, local society, power and the structure of available networks, the vertical and the horizontal interactions, the weak and the stronger ties as well as the field of the community 1.1.1 Field of a community The area a city occupies brings them together as they are working towards settling the problems befalling them. Therefore, in the local societies is where the problems are first identified, then the information gathered together. Besides, the energy and resources used in the settling of the general issues are also determined in the community field. The community is in a position to hand together with the problems. 1.1.2 Local society In the local community, those members have something in common. It may be they are in the same social life, employed in similar organizations among others 1.1.3 structure of the community The structure of the population can be classified into several types including amorphous, segmentations, integration and fictionalization. On integration, the society is said to coordinate all activities they come across in all departments. The segmented type has the members only organizing in their departments or sectors. In amorphous, there is no structure, and if available, it’s microscopic. Therefore the society is likely to dissolve. Besides, fictionalization has the community divided into various sub-groups basing on cultural beliefs, status on socio-economy as well as the political stands of the members 1.1.4 Vertical and Horizontal aspect. The vertical aspect explains the interaction of people with other nation’s outside their environment while the horizontal dimension is between an enclosed communities. It’s either through games and sports, blood ties among others. 1.1.5 Weak and vigorous ties In strong ties, the community is firmly packed due to intensity there being of emotions, the intimacy and time available to spend with one another. On the weak side, the society is found to spend less time in its environment though they have a strong tie to their homeland community. 1.1.6 Community Narratives. These include the stories the community share. This helps in the reinforcement of the communities, attitude, values as well as traditions. Therefore, from Wilkinson’s’ suggestion, the simplest way of understanding the society is an acronym formed: F-Fields L-local I - Interactions N- Narratives T- Ties S- Structures 2.1 Approaches to community The approach to the Aboriginal society is based on the instrumentals used, their contribution to the success of Australia, the developmental initiatives taken as well as the empowerment of the community. As the approaches are, they are often applicable in combination; they are not discrete as there are as well as the coexistence of the elements. In trying to understand a community, several contributions are made which involve making donations voluntarily. Ackerly in the year 2007 explained more about approaching a community and the traits that are expected to be identified in a community among the members. The contribution should not reach to giving the decision young opt for to the community. When only researching a community, it’s good to know the expected response of the members since many societies don’t like their culture getting out of their lands. This will help one identify the appropriate tactics to get the data as well as keep the members in the darkness from knowing your mission. The initiative is as documented by Dayton in the year 2010 When approaching to a community, identification of the key personnel helps a lot since you won’t do the try-and-error method to get the right information. It also depends on one's interest in a community. Is it to learn from the society, or to join the community? If it’s to join, identify a friend who should help you understand the community beater, take you through the geography of the lands. (Davey, 2005) Participating in the community's decision-making may make one not understand the view of the society towards the present situation. Sometimes the participant in the community on decision making is little. Therefore, offering a range of choices to expect to be made should then be provided to the elderly in the society or the young who can’t quickly make decisions on their own. (Roson, 2007) As in the empowerment, the practice framework of the indigenous society works hand in hand with other structures to achieve its goals as claimed by Rees. Also, it gives advice on the strategic measures supposed to be taken for the development of a social program that cares for the society's problems. Through community work, the development of initiatives is expected as documented by Rees in the year 2004 Frameworks availably accessible are well done by the society. They include the participative evolution of the members of the society, the construction of communities which are cast as well as developing a community that is asset-based. Besides, there is the need for the development of a society fond of interacting, since the members get to learn from themselves as well as borrow ideas and lifestyle from their fellows. The community should be made participative in the research activities. (Raynor, 2002) As a result, they end up having great knowledge after putting together knowledge attained through interaction with members across the nation. The development of interactive community bases its task on the conceptual approach of development. Social justice is underpinned too to necessitate the activation of the free and partnership activities. In the approach to the Aboriginal community in Australia, several success factors are to be taken care of. Consideration of whether a business takes care of respectful and an authenticated partnership with the community should be made along sides’ verification of whether there is persistence, patience, and goodwill in the connection constructed between the community, the academic researchers as well as the bodies giving funds. Besides, delivery and content designs are made since they help in putting into consideration the aspirations and the needs of the community. (Oliver, 2010) In the approach, challenges are attached to the project. There is the lack of programs for securing the programs that go beyond the disciplinary as well as the jurisdiction boundaries. These securities excuse better service enhancement, construction of work capacity as well as offering educational protection. In some cases, maintenance of contact with Aboriginal students in the remote areas is a challenging activity as the researcher is unable to help them solve the challenges they are facing. The challenges they are likely to face are the lack of support of students from the society of their family as well as suffering from isolation related disorders or conditions. For one to handle the cases brought to the table by the students, eat up into one's private time that one could utilize commitments that are not involved with the job. Besides, meeting charges that are in the approach of responses associated with a community-based response that includes the provision of support from professionals after retirement from the schools is a primary challenge. Also, the protocol of the cultural practices by the aboriginals is thoroughly grounded thus posing a challenge to the researchers as well as the investors and inventors. (Mouillot, 2013) Skills in Working with the community Working with the community begins from socializing, the creation of a rapport with the members of the particular community as well as trying to understand the virtues and the vices among the members. It is clarified further by Issel, in a documentary produced in 2004.This will help one make accurate determination and response to activities within the geographical area. Keen measures are necessary since the community might end up ganging against working with one and cause harm to them. Believing the society on board helps one understand and work with it more efficiently. Besides, one has to be courageous to face the challenges accompanied by getting to work with new individual thus critical thinking should be a skill to develop. The society members may take the role to inform one of the Cultures of the society, the meaning and the basis of interaction among the members. There could be differences between boarding communities or boundaries which researchers are not allowed to go beyond without authorization. Therefore working with the community is a complex activity most times but the best if it succeeds as in a document by Mouillot. In the community, there is the need for unity as it’s explained in a documentary by Meldrum in 2002. Therefore one is required to bring them together within a short period through the experts and leaders of the community. They are termed as the resource intensives. Through the use of media, photographs and videos will be able to learn how to work with the respective community. As an example, working with a community brought together by their disorders which include the obese, asthmatic among others' several factors are supposed to be made. What can easily embarrass them, what do they love most, what are the capable of doing among others. Working with a community may be complex and a hectic activity when one is not keen. The most efficient skill involves working in small groups for the success of one's goal. This is due to the ease of regulating and control long a limited number of individuals. In the grouping, the concept covered determines a lot. Besides, one should be gender sensitive as well as age sensitive. It's easier to work with the youth and the young families, of age 50 years and below as explained by Davey. The old age may not understand the current and the expected developments and in the society. Also, the young cannot be able to answer questions pertaining activities or occurrences that happened many years ago. Therefore despite the ease of trying and disguisement by the old, all type of people are necessary for the working with the community. The explanation is as documented by Gilchrist in the year 2009. Methods were applicable on the interaction of a community. Issel encouraged Face to face interview to all range of people is an essential practice of data collection. The process is the best since it's not limited to anything. One can get all the information needed, he can ask for clarification of concept that has not been adequately understood or well answered. As documented by Brown in the year 2010, the questioner will always give limited information with profound changes to learn more than the directing record. This reduces the ability of one to interact with the society as well as learning much about them. Conclusion For effectiveness when dealing with a community, proper understanding of the particular community is the primary step to take. It helps one identify the dos, and the don’ts in the society. Besides, one should have various skills necessary in all communities they are likely to work with. Confidence, impressive power, knowledge of oneself, critical thinking capacity and active listening ability should be at their peak to the student. The approaches to working with a community vary from one geographical are to another. One needs to be creative and adjustable to reactions from one member to the other in the society. View the YouTube links at the end of the journal for more clarification of my understanding on Introduction to Community. Reference list Ackerly, D. D., & Cornwell, W. K. (2007). A trait‐based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within and among‐community components. Ecology Letters, 10(2), 135-145. Brown, B., Crawford, P., & Darongkamas, J. (2010). Blurred roles and permeable boundaries: the experience of multidisciplinary working in community mental health. Health & social care in Davey, B., Levin, E., Iliffe, S., & Kharicha, K. (2005). Integrating health and social care: implications for joint working and community care outcomes for older people. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(1), 22-34.The community, 8(6), 425-435. Dayton, P. K. (2012). Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effects of enrichments to the benthos at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. In Proceedings of the colloquium on conservation problems in Antarctica. Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA (pp. 81-95). Gilchrist, A. (2009). The well-connected community: a networking approach to community development. Policy Press. Issel, L. M. (2004). Health program planning and evaluation: A practical, systematic approach to community health. Jones & Bartlett Learning. Meldrum, L., King, R., & Spooner, D. (2002). Secondary traumatic stress in case managers working in community mental health services. Treating compassion fatigue, 85-106. Mouillot, D., Graham, N. A., Villéger, S., Mason, N. W., & Bellwood, D. R. (2013). A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(3), 167-177. Oliver, W. M. (2010). Community-oriented policing: A systemic approach to policing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. (2002). Understanding community Penalties: Probation, policy and social change. Open University Press. Rees, G., Huby, G., McDade, L., & McKechnie, L. (2004). Joint working in community mental health teams: implementation of an integrated care pathway. Health & social care in the community, 12(6), 527-536. Rosón, B., Carratala, J., Verdaguer, R., Dorca, J., Manresa, F., & Gudiol, F. (2007). The prospective study of the usefulness of sputum Gram stain in the initial approach to community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Clinical infectious diseases, 31(4), 869-874. YouTube videos https://youtu.be/bpAS5f4TjNw https://youtu.be/iVQS-tpfna4 https://youtu.be/nZkgNmZ0rvA https://youtu.be/Bm0wsxKeRzM Read More