StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Nobody downloaded yet

Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This paper "Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime" discusses the death penalty itself as a cruel and inhuman mode of punishment. The electric chair, the gas chamber, firing squad, and lethal injection may have been developed to minimize suffering during the execution…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime"

Download file to see previous pages Animal instincts are directed towards self-preservation and it is the law of nature that a stronger and healthier individual has more chances of living than his weaker counterpart. The survival of the fittest has now been established as a ground reality according to Darwinian philosophy. If we eliminate our civilized thought process, it emerges as a stark reality that we would not desist from attacking another living person or animal when we are overcome by the basic needs of food, shelter, and clothing. In times of natural disasters like earthquakes, wars and floods, and manmade disasters like war, it is not uncommon to witness ravaged populations shedding the façade of civilization and resorting to violence in order to fulfill their basic needs. Only very few personalities like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King have realized the stark truth behind human nature and suggested ways and means rise above oneself. Over the history of mankind, we have witnessed sheer injustice and abominable behavior from those who have been dominating power in different countries and cultures across the globe. Pre-defined rules and regulations have been made in history which have in majority been aimed at dominating certain sections of the society depending upon race, ethnicity, culture, and color which are starkly unidirectional in nature as far as human rights and privileges are concerned. The administration of punishment whenever these laws are flouted is in accordance with these prejudiced laws. How can then we believe that law which is man-made correct morally as well as ethically. The death sentence is one such punishment that surpasses one and all in its ignominious and horrific nature. How can kill a person, howsoever justified, set right the crime or reverse the loss already suffered by a victim and his or her family? There are ways and means available to humanity which can inflict punishment in a much more effective and suitable manner.  ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime Case Study, n.d.)
Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime Case Study. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1719695-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished
(Death Penalty: Does It Serve As a Deterrent to Future Crime Case Study)
Death Penalty: Does It Serve As a Deterrent to Future Crime Case Study. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1719695-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished.
“Death Penalty: Does It Serve As a Deterrent to Future Crime Case Study”. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1719695-why-the-death-penalty-should-be-abolished.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime

Death Penalty

... to maintain a criminal in the prison for the rest of the life (Paternoster and Bacon 91). Those against argue that the financial amount required is pegged on the long court procedures, legal wrangling and many endless appeals. A criminal can be on death row for up to 20 years (Baumgartner, Boydstun and De Boef 47). This is very expensive for the state due to the said legal procedures. Supporters of the death penalty state that it is better to use state resources to penalize the murderers in order to save lives of innocent people. They categorically state that this action creates crime deterrent. Crime would always be on the increase if there is no any stern action taken against these people (Vaughn 98). According to research carried out...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Death penalty

According to the research findings it can therefore be said that in a world characterized by all forms of crimes, law and justice are very important aspects in the society. There are different levels of crimes. Some are civil while others are capital. Governments and religious organization dictate the course of justice to the offended and the punishment to the convicted in the society. There are various forms of justice and punishment applied by governments and religious groups. Different crimes require different punishments. Among such punishments is the death penalty. However, in also most all cases the power to prescribe a punishment rests with the courts of law that are arms of the government. Death penalty also known as capit...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The Deterrent Effects of the Death Penalty: Tangible or Mythical

... The Deterrent Effects of the Death Penalty: Tangible or Mythical? Introduction The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the act of granting the state power to execute an individual convicted of certain crimes. Deterrence is the idea that the example of punishing one crime can prevent future commission of crimes by the criminal or other would-be criminals (Melusky & Pesto, p. 109). General deterrence works by convincing the general public that engaging in criminal activity will be harshly punished, thus discouraging them. Specific deterrence is whereby identified criminals are prevented from committing criminal acts again. The knowledge that a certain act would lead to death is supposed to scare people from crime and act as a deterrent...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Death penalty

... Jane Doe Introduction Death penalty is when a government takes the life of an individual as punishment for wrong doing.This form of punishment is the most extreme punishment that a government can use on its citizens. It has been used at different times in many societies in all parts of the world, though mainly as a last resort in a small number of cases. At the beginning of the 20th century, nearly all countries practiced some form of capital punishment, but it is no longer used in most countries (Stearman, 2007). The benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty are debated widely. Can it ever be justified? And if it can, under what circumstances should it be used? Does the punishment acts as a deterrent? What are the alternatives? Does...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death Penalty

... Module Death Penalty Is the death penalty moral? Does it curb crime? The issue of the death penalty raises many questions and the answer on its effects varies depending on the respondent. The crucial dilemma lies on the legality of the death penalty and its effectiveness in curbing crime. Death penalty is defined as the use of death to punish criminal law offenders. It has been applied as a form of punishment since the colonial era. Recent statistics on the crime rate indicate that the death penalty is ranked amongst the least effective measures for curbing crime. Punishments are meant to rehabilitate the criminals and enable them to reform. Therefore, if the criminal is killed, the punishment loses its worth. The measure is effective...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The death penalty is not a deterrent

These criminologists confirmed the previous finding that there is no deterrent effect for capital punishment. Perceptions and attitudes of peoples towards the death penalty can change with increased knowledge. If there’s enough information campaign by people in government and those concerned, favourable opinion can be gained for the abolition of capital punishment. The European Union adopted its Charter of Fundamental Rights which states that everyone has the right to life and no one shall be condemned to the death penalty, or executed. This should be binding on all peoples and all states, big and small. But for the victim’s side, there is demand for justice or retribution. When someone in the family is a victim of a crime, such...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

The death penalty is not a deterrent

...? The Death Penalty is Not a Deterrent Introduction Society should judge conduct, not human worth. If we punish a criminal, it is because of what he had done to his victim, not because he was that bad and society must punish him. Criminal law states that society must judge conduct and not souls. How can we pass ultimate judgment on people’s moral values? If we punish or put to death criminals, we place ourselves instead of God. We are mortal like other humans who commit heinous crimes. (Pillsbury x) There’s a lot of killing in America. The national rates in this country far exceeds any industrialized country. Pillsbury argued that it is the violence of our crimes that is the problem and not the number of crimes. And in dealing...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Death penalty

... do the killing. Regardless of the reasons or justification for killing a person, a justified killing is tantamount to the application of barbaric and vengeful instincts. In the end, it does not diminish the impact of the crime on the victims and their families; the imposition of the death penalty will not bring back their dead relative, nor will it repair the damage that the crime has inflicted upon them and their families. In fact, the death penalty can sometimes end up breeding more pain and contempt, this time from the family of the convict. It is also important to consider that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to the commission of crimes. Based on FBI data (Amnesty International, p. 1), all 14 states in the US who do...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Death Penalty: not a detterent to crime

For concerned citizens, the big question is, is it right to sentence to death people who commit heinous crimes? Is implementing “an eye for an eye” justice the right way to go? The death penalty is a barbaric and outdated practice in modern times that needs careful examination to justify its continued existence. Analysis The purpose of this text is to convince the reader that a civilized nation should not condone the killing of people to discourage others from killing. The perspective of three different authoritative authors on capital punishment is examined to lend weight to my argument. Readers of this text may agree with me that as progressive people in America, Land of the Free, we can find better ways of punishing the aberra...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Death Penalty

...? Death Penalty Death Penalty Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, has, in the past, been exercised by many jurisdictions (Gaie, 2012). However, these days, only 58 nations actively exercise it and 97 nations have done away with it. The rest, nearly 50 states, have not utilized the law for a decade. They, however, permit it in exceptional situations for instance during wartimes. It is an issue of active controversy in numerous states and countries, and positions can differ in a single cultural region or political ideology. In the European Union (EU) member countries, the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights incorporated in Article 2 prohibits the use of death penalty (capital punishment) (Gaie, 2012). This paper...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Death Penalty: Does it Serve as a Deterrent to Future Crime for FREE!

Contact Us