Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Discuss the high cost of the death penalty and how life with out paroll would be better - Term Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The adversaries of death penalty believe that death penalty is not only an inhumane practice; it also does not serve the purpose of deterring crime. An added raison dêtre of its ineffectiveness…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.2% of users find it useful
Discuss the high cost of the death penalty and how life with out paroll would be better
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Discuss the high cost of the death penalty and how life with out paroll would be better"

Download file to see previous pages akers to replace it with life imprisonment without parole, as it costs less and has more lasting and influential effects on overall societies and communities.
Death penalty is actually “an economic drain on governments with already badly depleted budgets” (NYT, 2009). The process of death penalty becomes complicated and costly as soon as the person is convicted and ordered to be executed by the court. An appeal is forwarded as soon as the execution is ordered. And if that appeal is refused on any basis, a series of appeals starts to different courts until the appeal is accepted at district level or federal level, usually depending upon the financial background of the convicted. In Texas only, one out of every four death penalties is reversed through appeals. In New jersey, a quarter billion dollars have been spent on the death penalties yet not a single person was executed since 1983. The extensive trials, heightened official evaluation and costly appeal procedures of serious offences such as murder not only derails the whole system of justice but also delays it when even the case is very obvious. In fact “the longer death row inmates remain in that legal limbo, the more expensive they become” (Hess, 2011).
McCartin, a former jurist from California, who convicted nine men to death penalty, now opposes this law. Of the nine men he convicted, only one died, that too of a heart attack (msnbc, 2009). The time and money spent on only one convicted person of death penalty can be spent on a number of prisoners of same category if they are convicted to life time imprisonment without parole. Life imprisonment is not only cheaper but it also provides instant justice not only to the criminal but also to the victim’s family. And the ultimate burden of these trials is put on the tax payers i.e. the common man who struggles hard to earn his livelihood, but has to pay a huge amount in the name of taxes which is spent on these time and money wasting trials. In ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Discuss the high cost of the death penalty and how life with out Term Paper”, n.d.)
Discuss the high cost of the death penalty and how life with out Term Paper. Retrieved from
(Discuss the High Cost of the Death Penalty and How Life With Out Term Paper)
Discuss the High Cost of the Death Penalty and How Life With Out Term Paper.
“Discuss the High Cost of the Death Penalty and How Life With Out Term Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Discuss the high cost of the death penalty and how life with out paroll would be better

Death Penalty maintain a criminal in the prison for the rest of the life (Paternoster and Bacon 91). Those against argue that the financial amount required is pegged on the long court procedures, legal wrangling and many endless appeals. A criminal can be on death row for up to 20 years (Baumgartner, Boydstun and De Boef 47). This is very expensive for the state due to the said legal procedures. Supporters of the death penalty state that it is better to use state resources to penalize the murderers in order to save lives of innocent people. They categorically state that this action creates crime deterrent. Crime would always be on the increase if...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Death penalty

...are some of the execution methods that Islam recommends. Again, executions take place in public to serve as warnings to would-be criminals. Under the Islam law, enough evidence must be produced against a convict in a due court process for this penalty to be given. Since the early times, there have been debates and opinions in support and against the death penalty. In the United States, there is an equal division in relation to death penalty. Amnesty international condemns the death penalty in all cases regardless of the characteristics of the offender, nature of crime, or the method of execution....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death penalty contribute to a safe and secure environment? This debate is unlikely to end soon (Stearman, 2007). This debate is clearly one that is bound to go on for a long time with passionate debaters and defenders of stands on both sides of the argument. In this essay I take a stand on this debate by supporting the death penalty. I offer several reasons for this stand and provide references on the same. Some advocates of the death penalty offer support to the practice arguing that the death penalty justifies itself because it saves taxpayers the greater costs of supporting an inmate for a lifetime, or many decades, in prison....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death Penalty

...that they are going to spend minimal life in jail. Life sentencing is not appropriate enough as the murderous are later given parole. Executing may not replace the lost life but loss of more lives through murder can be prevented. Therefore, let us all support the death penalty. Works Cited "The Controversy Surrounding the Death Penalty." n.d. Web. 17 September 2012. Acker, James, and Rose Bellandi. “Firmament or Folly? Protecting the Innocent, Promoting Capital punishment and the Paradoxes of Reconciliation”. Justice Quarterly 29.2 (April 2012): n. pag. Web. 17 September 2012. Acker,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death penalty

.... It would be wrong for us to close our eyes to this grim possibility. Lang discusses the injustices suffered by Michael Blair as a basis for his opposition to the death penalty. He discusses how evidence eventually presented in court successfully proved that Blair was innocent of the crime being charged against him. However, this was after fourteen years spent in death row. This was after fourteen years of emotional trauma – waiting for the possibility of having his head next to the proverbial chopping block. Blair also lost fourteen years of his life – a life which could have been productive in terms of career, family, and social life. Until and unless we can absolutely avoid more ‘Michael Blair’ incidents can we safely consider... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Death Penalty and Life Imprisonment

.... 17 Jul. 2012. Messerli Joe. Should the Death Penalty be Banned as a Form of Punishment? BalancedPolitics.Org. n.d. Web. 17 Jul. 2012. Death Penalty Focus. The High Cost of the Death Penalty. n.d. Web. 17 Jul. 2012. Smith, Michael. Society Benefits from Death Penalty. Daily Herald, April 23, 2012. Web. 17 Jul. 2012. death-penalty/article_49fd3983-8881-5db4-bde4-8f58fdac87cd.html> Liao, Hali. Life Imprisonment is Better. 1999. Web. 17 Jul. 2012. Life Imprisonment is a Good Alternative to Capital Punishment. 2012. Web. 17 Jul. 2012. <>... , as there is existence of sentences that subject criminals to life imprisonment with no chance of parole. This way,...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

M1A3 - Organizatinal Behavior

3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Death Penalty

...the death of Jackson. However, it was later established that Jackson was the one that persuaded John to get drunk and forced him to drive him home while drunk. The victim’s family was left with no other option but to forgive John for the mistake. What I am trying to bring out by giving out this case is that there are always two sides to a story. One might argue that John deserved a death sentence and nothing else, but he was not the main cause of the accident. This might be the case in the inmate in topic, as well. Therefore, it would be better if the victim’s family considered listening to the side of the inmate. Also, not matter the...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Death penalty abolish capital punishment. Supporters of the death penalty argue that murder is a violation of the most fundamental of human rights: the right to life and this heinous crime merits the deathpenalty. Their contention is that justice, which is the basic tenet of the legal system, mandates that the punishment is appropriate to the seriousness of the crime. Here, the death penalty is the only punishment which is in proportion to the crime of depriving the victim of life. As murder violates the sanctity of life, justice is served only by the award of the death...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Death Penalty

...should fit the crime and this mantra is even supported by the Bible when it teaches “an eye for an eye”. However, based on the discussion and the reasons given above, the principle of “eye for an eye” should not be used lightly. After all, we are not talking here about eyes; we are talking here about lives. The more important concern of all is the innocent lives that are put at risk of being wrongly executed for violent crimes. The value of human life, no matter how warped or evil other people claim it to be, should not be taken lightly. Just as violent criminals take the value of human life too lightly, society should not take up a similar cause. The...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Discuss the high cost of the death penalty and how life with out paroll would be better for FREE!

Contact Us