Different Types of Equalities - Essay Example

Evaluation and Analysis of Different Types of Equalities al Affiliation Evaluation and Analysis of Different Types of Equalities The issue of equality is one of the most critical things in the lives of human beings. Equality is always supposed to apply to all the people without compromises occasioned by differences in biographical, geographical, as well as social perspectives. Equality is one of the rights that each and everybody always need to enjoy in their lifetime. Equality is a right of the people that is closely associated with the issue of freedom. It is of crucial significance to note that the issue of equality should always not be viewed in terms of absolute equality. In simple terms, it is important to understand that equality does not necessarily refer to absolute equality. In connection to the above, it is critical to understand that the issue of absolute equality cannot always be realized in its absolute totality. This follows the differences that are always inherent in the human beings. For instance, the capabilities of individuals are not commensurate. This means that some individuals may be capable of other things whereas their fellow counterparts may not be capable of the same things the others can do. In this respect, the issue of absolute equality can be considerably compromised (Hollander, 2014). In relation to the above, it is of critical significance to acknowledge the fact that when it comes to rewards, the people who may have succeeded in performing certain tasks may get rewarded in proportions that outdo those of the other fellows who may have also vested their efforts in doing the same thing, but have failed to succeed. In this manner, the notion that all of them are rewarded for their vested efforts is a clear representation of practice of equality (Hollander, 2011). This is evident concerning the fact that those who partook the task have all been rewarded. However, the issue of absolute equality may not apply in such a situation. This follows that those who may have succeeded in performing the tasks assigned may get more rewards as compared to the ones who may have failed to execute their best in the same tasks. As such, it is important to note that the latter proves that equality does not necessarily refer to total or absolute equality. In this respect, it is of crucial significance to understand the real meaning of the term equality. Relevant to the above, it is of critical significance to note that equality may mean the absence of all unnatural, as well as, unjust inequalities (Hands, 2015). Unjust inequalities may always take two different forms. Some of the forms of unjust inequalities may comprise of natural inequalities, as well as, manmade or anthropogenic unnatural inequalities. Manmade natural inequalities may comprise of the inequalities that are occasioned by the social conditions, as well as discriminations that individuals may always undergo in their social lives. These may always take the form of social as well as economic differences that may exist between individuals, which are occasioned by the normal functions as well as operations of the social systems. However, this paper is going to focus majorly on the issue of equality, but not inequalities. In respect to the above, it is important to note that the paper is going to analyze the issue of equality in respect to consideration of certain aspects of the issue of equality. Evaluation and Analysis of Different Types of Equalities It is of critical significance to highlight the fact that there are several types of equality. Some of these types of equality may be related, where as others may not be related. The relationship between these forms, or otherwise, the types of equalities occurs in the respect of their modes of expressions, as well as, applications. In connection to the above, it is prudent to understand some of these types of equalities. Relevant to the above, it is of paramount importance to note that there are a total of five types of equalities. Some of these types of equalities may comprise of civil equality, as well as, social equality. Other than the listed above, the other types of equality may comprise of natural equality, as well as, political forms of equality (Hands, 2015). In addition, the economic equality also forms some of the types of equalities. Civil equality is one of the types of equalities that touch on the issue of laws. In this type, it is significant to note that people should always be treated equally. This can only be achieved through subjecting individuals to the same laws. As such, there should be no forms of discriminations relevant to the differences that exist between the people with regards to the civil law. On the other hand, social equality always concerns equal considerations of individuals relevant to the opportunities in life, the privileges, as well as the rights of the people. This form of equality maintains that people should always be subjected to equality in considerations relevant to the enjoyment of social rights, considerations in opportunities, as well as observation of privileges in life (Marx and Engels, 2014). Other than civil equality as well as social equality, there are other forms of equality that exist. Some of the other types of equality include political equality, as well as, natural equality. Relevant to the above, it is critical to note that political equality always focuses mostly on the rights of citizens relevant to their political rights of choice, democracy in voting, as well as rationality in decision making relevant to political issues. Political equality also focuses on the rights of individuals to form political parties. In addition, it also embraces the efforts of individuals who may have the interests in vying for different political positions, as well as, applies the political rights to political protests, contests, as well as, political contributions (Marx and Engels, 2014). Other than political equality, there is also the natural equality. This equality champions the observance of the notion that all men are always born equal, as well as, free. In addition to the above, the natural equality highlights or rather asserts that all men are always endowed with equal gifts, as well as, talents in their lives. Moreover, the natural equality advocates for the states to ensure that the issue of inequality is minimized rather than perpetuated. The other form of equality refers to economic equality. This form of equality advocates of minimization of all the social differences that may exist as occasioned by differences in wealth and material possessions (Hollander, 2011). This form of equality allots for equal considerations of all people, regardless of their ages, gender, as well as other non-biological differences relevant to the issue of financial possessions and goods. In this respect, it is of crucial significance to note that economic equality champions the enjoyment rights of all people relevant to their wealth regardless of any perceived differences. It is of crucial significance to note that civil equality is very good. Even though the issue of absolute equality cannot be obtained in its totality, civil equality puts certain level of consideration that each and every person should always aim towards. This is the equality by law. As such, since the law is a binding factor, nobody should be considered superior to the other. As such, it is of critical significance to acknowledge the fact that civil equality has contributed towards protecting individuals from the dangers that may be posed by those who are in higher ranks of power, political positions, as well as higher positions in the economic as well as social spectra. It is always very easy for such people who are in higher positions to manipulate those who are in the lower positions. However the law is binding to all the people. As such, each and everyone should always be treated equally. This means that the civil equality prevents the people from harms that may emanate from all directions, be it plans from those in higher positions to harm those in lower ranks, or those in lower positions to collude in order to cause harms to those in upper positions (Hollander, 2011). Relevant to the above, it is of crucial significance to note that there are several sociologists who have also contributed to the field of equality in human beings. Some of these sociologists comprise of Karl Marx, Frederic Engels, as well as, Lenin. Relevant to the issue of civil equality, some of these sociologists have also made some of their assertions in order to strengthen, or other, offer more perspectives on the nature in which the issue of equality should be viewed. Relevant to the above, it is of critical significance to note that Karl Marx also echoes the establishment of classless, as well as, stateless societies. In relevance to the above, it is important to note that Marxism philosophy relevant to the issue of equality champions majorly the elimination of all forms of inequalities, as well as, hindering the proliferation of any source of such inequalities. Karl Marx maintains that the issue of equality should always be observed in all aspects, be it civil equality, economic equality, social, natural, as well as, political equalities (Kliman, 2007). These views are also shared by both Lenin, as well as, Engels. Relevant to the above, it is important to note that Lenin asserts that, “there can be no real, actual equality until all possibility of the exploitation of one class by another has been totally destroyed” (Lane, 1981). This proves that the issue of equality should be observed at all costs without any form of discrimination. Engels also asserts that “the real content of the proletarian demand for equality is the demand for the abolition of classes” (Hollander, 2011). This also means that the issue of equality should be observed at all costs, and should apply equally to all people. Bibliography Kliman, A. (2007). Reclaiming Marxs Capital: A refutation of the myth of inconsistency. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books. Lane, D. S. (1981). Leninism: A sociological interpretation. Cambridge [England: Cambridge University Press. Lane, D. (1981). Leninism: a Sociological Interpretation. Hollander, S. (2011). Friedrich Engels and Marxian Political Economy. Leiden: Cambridge University Press. Marx, K., Engels, F., Institut marksizma-leninizma (Moscow, Russia),, Project Muse,, & Project Muse. (2014). Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Volume 23. London [England: Lawrence & Wishart. Hands, G. (2015). Marx: A complete introduction. Hollander, S. (2011). Friedrich Engels and Marxian Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hollander, S. (2014). Friedrich Engels and Marxian political economy. Read More