They explored a remote cave in the central plateau of the society which then caved in on them following a massive landslide. The five men remained trapped under the massive boulders that blocked the only…
Download file to see previous pages...
In the process, ten people from the rescue team lost their lives and the entire operation appeared grim.
The trapped explorers faced imminent death from starvation. They contacted the rescue camp and explained their condition. The clinician present at the camp informed them that they would die within ten days while the head of the search team informed that they would require at least the same number of days to release them. In order to stay alive, the five decided to prey on one of their own, Roger Whetmore. From the evidence presented, Whetmore was the brainchild behind the idea and provided effective ways of determining the one to eat given their grim situation. The five cast a dice thereby determining that they should kill and eat Whetmore.
After the rescue team had succeeded and after the five men had regained their health, the commonwealth indicted them for the murder of Roger Whetmore. In the case, both the trial judge and the jury found the four guilty of killing Whetmore. In their ruling, the jury and the judge followed an integral statue in the society that stated, "Whoever shall willfully take the life of another shall be punished by death”. However, the four appealed the ruling the extra ordinary circumstances to the Supreme Court of Newgarth where I am to review their evidence and provide a new ruling.
Among the basic issues that the case present is the need to determine the guilt or innocence of the four men, they killed their colleague, and they have admitted doing so in a previous court. The laws of the land are clear on how to deal with people who kill others. However, the four base their argument on the uniqueness of their case. This implies that besides determining whether the two are guilty or innocent, my court will determine the applicability of the since the case tries the basic dictates of the law in the society.
Given the facts presented before the court, I reverse the ruling of the high court that
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Both of them made voyages to different places for different reasons at different times, and reached different conclusions. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the voyages of Christopher and Cook with special emphasis upon the excerpts on pages 474 and 544 in the book Traditions & Encounters: a Global Perspective on the past by Bentley and Herbert.
This case finds us in a state of great quandary and it is by no less than a tragedy that these men have found themselves for the second time in a short amount of time again fighting and hoping to stay alive. The members of the Speluncean Society comes before this Court with blood in their hands but with the same light of hope that glimmered in their eyes when they were freed after weeks of gruesome entrapment inside a dark and inauspicious cave that encapsulated their subsistence.
This case brought to the forefront various issues which entailed a vigorous re-examination of the legal underpinnings of government, and in fact, that of the legal principles which help structure an entire society due to the challenges to accepted jurisprudence and legal precedents.
The parliament members are elected by the public as in every other democratic country. So England can be considered as a democratic country. “In 1215 AD, the Magna Carta opened the door to a more democratic system in England”. (History of democracy) “The
ry criminal justice legislation being adhered to as of December 31, 1993 are the Criminal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Law on Judiciary” (Chapkey). The adversarial principle relies on the skill of each advocate representing his partys positions and involves a
parts of the work; the first will summarize the decisions of each of the judges, the second will talk of the factors that the jury should consider in a decision. The final part of the work will assess the differences between the functions of the legislature and the court. As
When judges decide a case they do not follow a set of pre-existing standards, but rather rely on a variety of techniques to get the result that they like. This is clearly demonstrated by Fullers hypothetical case of the Speluncean explorers where five
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Speluncean Explorers for FREE!