The Equal Distribution of Rights - Essay Example

Question Each individual is inevitably participating in certain groups since he lives in society. Because of this, it is common to associate his individual rights with the rights of the group he is a member of. However, in some cases rights of some individuals conflict with the group rights of other individuals. Thus, the state should try its best to guarantee the equal distribution of rights among all citizens within the multiculturalism policy. Question 2. The U.S. is not actively involved in contemporary environmental policy, because its contribution to the current state of green problems is bigger than the majority of other involved actors.

Moreover, the U.S. political system represents the conflict of interests between public organizations and politicians. Due to all these challenges, it is hard for the USA to provide quick decisions in environmental diplomacy. Question 3. In fact, the events of the two World Wars had shown that conflict of interests in the international system leads to great humanitarian and economical disasters. Since they had always started from the occupation of a certain territory, the current states tried their best to protect their sovereignty in the last century.

In other words, it is no longer acceptable for the state to claim that territory in the other country is its property, if there is no will of the local population. This change appeared in the post-war world order. Question 4. EssayIn the contemporary world, different interests often lead to open conflicts. Even though neoliberals believe in the potential of international institutions to neglect the states’ individual influence, the recent dispute between Saudi Arabia and Yemen reflects that we still deal with a world divided into states and full of conflict purposes.

In this context, the given essay discusses the Saudi-Yemen conflict through the concepts of terrorism and war to show the unresolved state of global security issues in the contemporary world. On the one hand, Saudi Arabia and Yemen's situation reveals that terrorism is still the subject of global policy concern. In fact, the appearance of Saudi Arabia's invasion both in political speeches and in media messages throughout the world reveals the nature of terrorism as not only an attempt to influence foreign governments but also an intense to create panic in the global public.

In addition, the great number of displaced civilians after the Decisive Storm operation fits the purpose of terrorism in its violent appearance. Thus, the current world deals with the political regime in contemporary Saudi Arabia as the one using terrorism as a tool in its policy. On another hand, the response from both the Yemen government and the international community shows that the presence of international organizations does not neglect the state of war between the individual countries. On the contrary, their open Yemen support evoked Saudi Arabia to create its own alliance with Arab states in order to start the war.

In other words, international institutions are the actors in the conflict of interests in their realist presentation. In sum, the recent events between Yemen and Saudi Arabia show that the contemporary world has not gotten rid of terroristic violence and military wars between the individual states. In the given case, the methods of Saudi Arabia and the harmful involvement of third parties in the international environment reveal that the realist framework is more accurate in explaining the current state of international relations than liberal thinking.