We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Can we apply Hobbes argument about the state of nature to international relations - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Hobbes is regarded as one of the originators of international relations theory and his argument regarding the state of nature is predominant in political philosophy. Since the description of the state of nature was introduced, debate has been rife among scholars concerning its…
Download full paper
Can we apply Hobbes argument about the state of nature to international relations
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Can we apply Hobbes argument about the state of nature to international relations

Download file to see previous pages... In this regard, the state of nature considers men to be in a competition with each other for resources that include food, for example. As a result, they tend to distrust and fear one another thus instigating a pre-emptive attack due to the quest to maximise their own interests at the expense of other people. On the other hand, difference, emanates from the desire for natural equality and the fear factor that eventually leads to war. On this note, the state of nature suggests that, the alternative option for removing the contributory factors to conflict is to embrace the state by surrendering sovereignty to the Leviathan in order to enjoy security and order. According to Hobbes, the international sphere exists in a form of the state of nature (1985, p.37). This paper explores whether Hobbes argument about the state of nature can apply to international relations. While international relations emphasises a peaceful co-existence between sovereign states, the Hobbesian view focuses on the defensive character of states. This makes it difficult to apply the Hobbesian argument in international relations because; it discards the moral principles that guide the relations among states.
Hobbes advances five conditions for the state of nature that includes equality, competition, and the existence of two types of people, non- universal egoism and uncertainty. With regard to equality, Hobbesian view reiterates that people possess almost equal mental and physical capabilities. As a result, those regarded as weak also have enough power either mental or physical to destroy the strongest. The competition caused by scarcity of resources also creates a situation where everyone grapples for the same unlimited resources. The Hobbesian view further associates the scarce resource with power since not everyone can amass power. In this sense, power is often a preserve for a few individuals in the society who tend to maximise it for their own self-interest (Hampton, 1987, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Are Hobbes theories of Politics on a Sicence of Human Nature as scientific as he might like to think
According to the research findings it can therefore be said that Hobbes argues that society needs an absolute sovereign who exerts control over a wide range of areas, and whom the subjects are not free to displace or to disagree with. He considers this to be necessary because of the inherent nature of humans that leads to conflict.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
The American Journalist Robert Kaplan stated that anyone who disbelieves Hobbes' state of nature argument has never visited Co
Hobbes has given a very unique face to how society was created and how individual roles changed over the years. According to him, there was a ‘state of nature’ even before the formation of society. It was a state where there were no laws governing the behavior of humans and the activities were so much cruel that even if a person needs to take something from his neighbor, he would just kill him and take it in his possession.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Hobbes and Locke views on the State of Nature
Locke argues that in a state of nature, all individuals have a natural right to whatever it is they obtain, so long as they labour upon it. In a state of nature, all individuals have equal rights against eachother. The following will examine the state of nature in both philosophers, and in turn, it will be argued that Hobbes view of nature leads to a position that defends a strong sovereign or monarchy, by contrast, Locke's more egalitarian view of nature leads to a more democratic society.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Hobbes and the State of Nature
In addition, Africa seems to be in a constant state of turmoil going from one bad government to another. Then, there are tensions in Afghanistan and in Asia, with China being more assertive. In the background is the constant threat of terrorism. The adage that ‘everything changes to remain the same’ could certainly be true in the current state of international affair, as the same themes have been present for millennium-power, instability and the ‘appropriate’ action.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Political Philosophy (Hobbes' ideas about human nature)
To discuss the views of Hobbes and compares it with the views of other philosophers, it is important to understand the different influences on Hobbes which shaped his overall work. Hobbes’s most of the work is either a reaction to the religious doctrines and authority of that time or it was more oriented towards the emerging new mean of understanding truth through scientific method.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Compare and contrast Hobbes' and Locke's account of the state of nature
The analysis will be presented in a comparison format which will enhance the differing viewpoints of Hobbes and Locke regarding subject matter. Human Nature: It should be noted that all the social theorists of natural law have come up with the statement that the nature of humans is animal-like.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Compare and contrast the ideas about human nature in two theorists Hobbes and Locke
Despite certain similarities that were largely due to similar historic and intellectual context of the Enlightenment, the philosophers maintained dramatic differences in their views on social structure, political organization and the nature of human being.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
How do the views of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories
For Machiavelli the law was a means to an end. The law was purely that which enabled the principality to be held together and the prince to hold on to power. Hobbes, in a different way, also saw the rule of law as a thing which was necessarily imposed from above.
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
Hobbes and Rousseau's Depiction of the state of nature and human nature
In this paper, my goal in this paper is to compare and contrasts their respective depictions about human nature and state of nature and see the philosopher with the strongest depiction and also be able to see if what they both said is
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Introduction to International Politics. International Conflicts
Realism vs. Liberalism Realism in definition is a school of international relations theory. Realism, as described by Jack Donnelly, a professor of history in international relations at the University of Cambridge, mentions that it is not just an explicit set of assumptions and ideas but rather it is a general orientation: “a philosophical disposition”(Donnelly, 2000, p. 6).
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Can we apply Hobbes argument about the state of nature to international relations for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us