Tube feeding - Annotated Bibliography Example

Annotated Bibliography – Tube Feeding Curtis, Kristine. "Caring For Adult Patients Who Require Nasogastric Feeding Tubes." Nursing Standard 27.38 (2013): 47-56. The article investigates safety-related challenges that can occur during the insertion of nasogastric feeding tubes or even during the maintenance of such tubes. It also touches on the various methods through which nurses can provide tube-feeding services for adult patients. Fundamentally, the article looks into how nurses and caregivers can use nasogastric tubes to administer food to adult patients, who may be either at the hospital or at home.

The insertion of the tubes is very important in the article because most nurses are acquainted with the process. The results of the article show that patients may die or sustain serious injuries when the nurse administering to them loses the nasogastric feeding tube during insertion process or when the patients are using the tubes. The implication of the article is to provide nurses will the knowledge and skill to manage the nasogastric feeding tubes wisely.Hannah, Erin, and Rita Marie John. "Everything The Nurse Practitioner Should Know About Pediatric Feeding Tubes.

" Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners 25.11 (2013): 567-577.The purpose of the article was to enlighten the a nurse practitioner as far as feeding tube complication, contemporary feeding tubes, and the use of feeding tubes are concerned, particularly when it comes to the pediatric population. The study primarily depended on literature review with academic databases such as PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL being in use. The study revealed that all children who could not take nutrition through normal or oral means qualified for tube feeding.

In addition, the study found out that a nurse practitioner (NP) could use gastrojejunostomy (GJ) tubes, pediatric gastrostomy (G) tubes, and nasogastric (NG) tubes on children. The implication of the research is to inform about how to care for children with enteral feeding tube access and how NPs can handle such patients in their daily routines.Brown, David. “Feeding-Tube Benefit Questioned.” Washington Post 1 April 2005: A14. Print.The reporter outlines some of the major skepticisms against the feeding tube, particularly as it relates to Parkinsons Patients and aspiration pneumonia.

In essence, the reporter cites the views of various experts concerning the contentious topic where some experts allude to the fact that the use of feeding tube can significantly reduce the risk of catching aspiration pneumonia. On the other hand, some experts are opposed to the placement of the device on Parkinsons Patients, arguing that it is highly unlikely to extend the lives of such patients. The implication of this newspaper article is to provide the nurses and public with general and specific information concerning the potent of the feeding tube on Parkinsons and aspiration pneumonia Patients.

Pro and Con argumentTube feeding is important because it assists patients who are unable to take in nutrition naturally. In addition, tube feeding is essential for the elderly patient who cannot ingest food orally. On the contrary, tube feeding cannot allow the patient to take solid food since it will not pass through the tube. Besides, tube feeding is extremely dangerous, particularly during insertion and maintenance because it can lead to serious harm or even death of the patient (Hannah and John 567-577).Outline1. Candidates for feeding tube1.1. Children1.

2 Patients with   mechanical obstruction and neurologic disease1.2. ICU patients1.3. patients with eating disorders1.4. In patients who have advanced dementia2. Types of feeding tube2.1. Nasojejunal Feeding Tube2.2. Nasogastric Feeding Tube2.3. Gastrostomy or Gastric feeding tube2.4. Jejunal feeding tube2.5. Gastrojejunal feeding tube3. Safety and complications of feeding tube