Liberal Democratic Tradition - Essay Example

What liberals believe and the right of liberals, and how they perceive the role of the liberal government Introduction Liberalism being a moral and political philosophy makes individuals the supreme carriers of society’s heart, for a highly valued society the people have to emulate on liberty. The Society assists people to explore their potentials as far as liberty is concerned. These two key cores are the foundation upon which various elements of liberalism occur. Liberalism is the most contested act consisting of different competing ideas on how society should conduct its functions. Associate Professor Greg Mellish, at the liberty and community conference on 12 September 2009, defined liberalism in relation to its main principles of individualism and freedom. From these principles, other elements of freedom include individualism, egalitarianism, universalism and meliorism. The presentation was positioned in the minds of the people that it gives a detailed point of liberation. Liberalism is being steered by certain themes such as not allowing the government to take control of people’s life (Buchanan 2008). A good number of Liberals believe that one is entitled to his/her opinions and thoughts. A rebel will agree with a woman who wants to abort. Liberals have support for every woman who is deemed free to choose what is good or bad for her. When it comes to love issues, most Liberals are not bothered with same-sex marriage. Liberals in America believe that every gay or straight is entitled to choose whom to love and marry. There is no boundary when it comes to the issues of the heart. It is clear for every liberal that everyone in society is free to believe in his or her religion. Individuals can believe in what their religion prescribes them to do (Mower, 2012). One can decide to worship throughout the week or even once per week depending on how they want it. If once decides to follow no religion its right for him/her. Religion should be kept private among individuals and that prayer should not interrupt other people (Barry 2009). Liberals believe that whether rich or poor everyone is subjected to equality. Economic conditions should not favor the privileged members of the society. Every member of the community is subjected to equal rights, Resources should be distributed amongst people equally without discrimination of age, race and gender. While individualism is a valid element egalitarianism, meliorism are primary fundamentals of liberalism. As promoted by classical liberalism, egalitarianism defines the equal opportunity everyone is entitled to. This will also comprise legal and political equality. Experts in the field made it clear that there should be no impediments to the people as they build the nation in different expertise. Universalism states the principle that is subjected to every individual in the society. On the other hand, it has been developed in the minds of Liberals, that every human being has the potential to become better by adjusting their way of living (Barry 2008). There is a critical implication that liberalism holds for society, since the state of being individual is reached when everyone is entitled to his/her opinion. There a need for the authority to take a different and specified approach to the society. Liberals support that everyone can voluntarily add up and form a peaceful association. Liberty should not be taken for competition over another or Darwinism; it should be a good will from the people to cooperate. Individuals believe that with liberty does not only offer justice to morality but also takes the society to higher heights in material wealth since individuals is allowed to maximize their potentials. The state should protect the life of every individual as much as it can. Across the world, there are two opinions on liberalism. The first version claims that Liberals believe that the state should take responsibility for what happens to the life of every citizen. The second thought on liberalism is that it steers negativity in freedom. In Australia, the second thought of liberalism is termed as conservatism. This has not been clearly understood by experts since it could provide a chance for greater state intervention as it is the case in Britain (Buchanan 2008). Liberals believe that Liberalism is a malty-faceted ideology with diverse implication to the society at large. It takes concern to the individual level with liberty, having two dimensions leading to liberalism, even though some fundamentals of freedom is subjected to critics among esteemed Liberals. A good number of Liberals will get along individualism, egalitarianism, universalism and meliorism. With a society subjected to negative freedom, it tends to have the authority to administer a laissez-faire approach to the members of the community and will take charge of the same principle, disable free riders, and be there for those who cannot take control of their own decision making (Fontona-giusts 2008). This kind of liberalism is relatively equal to the type of conservatism that dominates America but in the current British conservatism. This voices the thoughts of the greater state intervention prevailing in Australia. The state of our society can become free for every individual if the administrative centralism that was there since 1901 is initialized (Bateman 2008). Under the Brazilian law, every citizen including Liberals is entitled to human rights. Everyone has a right to life, liberty, formal equality, and security. A clear way to make the constitution more refined may be reached by studying the historical enhancement of the general ideal human rights. The liberal’s rights can be divided into three phases of rights fraternity, equality and liberty following the watchwords of the French Revolution (Stone 2008). The first phase of the human rights epitomizes the idea of individual freedom against the government oppression. This was advocated by 1688 Glorious Revolution (Great Britain) and was followed by advocation of the same idea by the American and French revolutionaries in the eighteenth century (Mower 2012). Under the United States of America bill of rights, there is a declaration of the human rights that was designed on Lord Action basis that the political power corrupts, and the absolute power corrupts absolutely. Its defines clearly that the citizens of the nation are more supreme than the state. This respectively enumerates the fundamental right to life, security of the people, what the people own, free speech, association and the freedom of religion. A consistent demonstration of these rights is a valid ground that projects those human rights should be preserved, thus seeing to it the tactic of civil resistance against political brutality. After the historical consolidation of the first phase of rights, there is an emergence of another series of rights in the nineteenth century, which demanded for more intervention from the higher authority that every rebel need should be satisfied. This includes clothing, shelter, food, education and proper health. The second phase of the human rights encompasses the right to rest, work, social security, education, and leisure. The third phase of the human rights recently emerged covering a broader scale of the rights, which includes a refined health environment, self-determination and preservation of traditional beliefs. Part of this phase of rights are privileges accrued by specific ethnic, religious on the situation they have, or rather if they are discriminated against the society they live in. In reality, the law caters for all phases of rights. Its sole explicitly narrates that the constitution single objective is to attain a democratic free state. With the reasons being an administration of social individual rights, liberty, well-being, equality, development and justice among all Liberals. The Brazilian constitution, the dignity of the human person, and primacy of the rebel right is composed of dynamic principles on which higher authority must execute its power as a democratic government under the rule of law (Miller 2008). Every power emanates from the Liberals, who are prescript to exercise this power via their elected representatives in the parliament and also through the renowned plebiscite. The referendum and the proposed law designed to suit their functions of building a greater nation. The authority, in relation to a well public assistance for the needy ones and the disadvantaged, should protect every mother and child. Under the working rights include protection from arbitrary dismissal, minimal wage,social security at work, the right to conduct a strike, the right to join union association, right to be paid on time as stated in the performance contract, right for the women to attend maternity leave, prohibition of difference by gender or age and one should be paid according to his/her experience and qualification (Robertson and Merrill 2009). As for the third phase of the Liberals rights for the law offers other several provisions. Every human is entitled to a constitutional right to an ecologically balanced environment. To attain this section of power the Constitution stipulates the role of every higher authority to administer treatment to the nations ecosystem and to protect it against any form of violation, which might put the lives of the animals at stake and endanger unusual species (Buchanan, 2010). The law formally protects the freedom of expression for intellectual, artistic, scientific and every media functions. It is clearly positioned to the mind of the people that the higher authority should not restrict any form of thought, expression, and information for political, ideological, or artistic grounds. Everyone is allowed to express what it is in his/her heart (Forsythe 2009). Freedom of the press is a critical right to every rebel living in any democratic nation. In Brazil the right to press has to be taken into consideration since 1984 during the reign of the military government, It is now subjected to renewed attack especially from the federal government. Since his role as the president of Brazil, Lula da Silva gave numerous complaints about the media that aired negative broadcasts about his government. He urged the media to develop loyalty and good relationship with the government (Stein 2010). There are a million reasons for the citizens to protest for the right to press since the media is the only tool for them to know what is happening in the world and parts of their nation that they cannot gain access. Liberals perceive the role of the liberal government that the government was being instituted by the Supreme Being for the interest of the people. The government should design laws and administer them to enable a good living for the society. The government should secure the rights and freedoms of the people. In a broader context, the role of the government is to maintain national military and the police force for protecting human life, loss of property either private or public at hands foreign or local criminals (Bourke 2010). It should be clear that the law prohibits the government from taking either life liberty from the people. The governments should ensure that the infrastructure of the people is good enough for the people to administer their functions while building the nation (Fontona-giusts 2008). It is clear that democracy and liberalism cannot have one without the other. About a century ago, democracy proved itself to be confined with an exception of the northern part of America. North America had revolutionized by then to extreme levels. The number of the middle-class people was sizeable; the rate of literacy was high that political leaders termed prerequisites for a successful democracy. America was not only home for free and fair election but also the rule of law and protection of the peoples liberties. By contrast, some parts of the world were neither liberal nor democratic. The kind of leadership evidenced in such states was the dictatorship and single party. By 1990 everything had changed dramatically as a surprising number of autocratic regimes all over the other continents fell from power. Regimes whose main aim was to achieve democratic system took control. This gave rise to the phenomenon that Samuel P. Huntington branded “third wave” of democratization. In the world, we living in today everyone is allowed by the rule of law to elect his/her government. Which it will represent their opinions. Free and fair election is a vital element of a healthy democracy. The beauty of democracy cannot be fully attained until every member of the community as the law prescribes chooses their representatives in parliament through an election that are free and fair. The desired development efforts without legitimately elected authorities by the people. An Election is the only instrument that will enable citizens to pursue their democratic dreams and foster for political liberalization. Election plays a vital role to encourage political debate for voters to evaluated legit leaders. Its only in a democratic state that the people feel they are part of the government. . Reference List Barry, B. (2009) “Self-Government Revisited”. In The Nature of Political Theory, 156–184. Barry, B. (2008) “Nationalism Versus Liberalism”. Nations and Nationality 2, 3, 423–435. Bateman, A. (2008). What a Political battle. [Cartoon] East Coast Independent. 14th April 2008. p6. Bourke, J. P. (2010) Criminal Law, Victoria, vol 1 (at Service 95) [3.120 Buchanan, A. (2010) “The Morality of Secession”. In The Rights of Minority Cultures, 350–374. Will Kymlicka, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fontona-Giusts, G. (2008) Designing Cities for People: Social, Environment, and Psychological sustainability. London: Earthscan.fairs 45, 2, 347–365 Forsythe, D. P. (2009) Encyclopaedia of human rights. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press  Miller, D. (2008) On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendron Press Miller, D. (2010) “In Defence Nationality’. Journal of Applied Philosophy 10, 3-6 Moravcsik, A. (2008) “Liberalism and International Relation Theory”, Harvard University, CFIA Working Paper 92-6 Mower, A. G. (2012) ‘Regional Human Rights: A Comparative Study of the West and Inter-American systems. New York: Greenwood Press Robertson and Merrill J.G (2009) Human Rights in Europe: A Study the European Convention in Human Rights Manchester, Manchester University Press Stein, E. (2010) “lawyers, Judges, and making of Transitional Constitutional”, American Journal of International Law 75: 1-27 Stone, A. (2008) The birth of Judicial Politics in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press. United Nations. [Online] Available at: http://www.un.org/en/sections/what-we-do/protect-human-rights/index.html [Accessed 6 April 2015]. Read More