No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act - Research Paper Example

of No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act Introduction The law establishes that no federal funding is to set for abortion purposes. The instance, however, accepts funding that tends to be for abortion that may be due to incest, rape or other complications that may endanger the life of a citizen. The law also provides that no act of abortion is to be in practice in any governmental health facility. The law also forbids any person who works for the federal government to commit abortion. The instance is except for rare cases of incest, rape as well as health complications. In the act, there is also a refund of all revenues that were for abortion purposes as per December 31, 2014. The funds that may be of use as per the law are for any complications that may result from an abortion whose appropriation was for the health benefit of a patient. Therefore, no health plan or insurance that is for a health plan should include any costs or funds that are for abortion needs (Doerflinger, p.127). Importance The law is significant since the cases of abortion are increasing every day. The moral laws that were useful in the past years are loosening their grasp, and most teenagers involve in abortion. It is, therefore, important to know that abortion is a crime except in the case of rape, possible incest or health complication. The government has no provisional funds for the abortion procedures and thus the instance is out of practice (Roh J., p. 69). Thesis statement The abortion act prevents the inevitable. The instances of population increase and the adoption of new morals in the society make the act hard to implement. Young teenagers are becoming pregnant, and their primary concern is not to get pregnant. It is even true to say that most people tend to avoid pregnancies more than they prevent HIV and AIDS plus other STDs. Overview The paper will thus debate on the validity and necessity of the law as per the opinions of scholars and the events that are changing the morals of all people living in the twenty-first century. The essay will also articulate ion the best way to practice the law in order to make it efficient and fair to the economy and the population. Brief Explanation of Law Intent The primary purpose is to safeguard the conscience of the persons who involve in rape. Also, the bill points out that the purpose is to prohibit any funds that emanate from the taxpayers that enter the abortion purposes. The Act also enacts a permanent restriction on the funds from the federal government towards abortion purposes in the USA (Hanna, p. 144). Current stage The bill has undergone major acceptance in almost all the houses winning more than a quorum of the votes. The president is also in support of the bill. The current position is thus the veto overriding whereby the act becomes a law if there are at least a quorum votes of the members who include at least two thirds. Support and rejection of the law The various institutions include the Catholic Church and various critics who are representatives of different agencies. The instances include Debbie Wasserman, a Florida Democrat, Mother Jones, and Dan Lipinski. The political parties such as republican and democrat also were in debate of the subject. Argument Thesis statement The abortion act prevents the inevitable. The technological advancement in the globe makes all teenagers prone to immoral components. The teenagers are also the majority in the practice of abortions since they are not ready to take off the births. The changing persons of sex after marriage and the various arguments against abortion create a gap for persons without the knowledge to practice proper abortion. Reasons The primary end of the law is definite. On the contrary, theres no record the changes that are emanating from the advances that are a part of the population. The church is losing its grasp on the people that once were abiding by each and every law. The instance of sex before marriage is becoming more common in every society regardless of the religion. The education of women is creating more freedom for the choices that females make. The instance also creates a scenario of independence. The smaller generation is thus adoption a new culture whereby they desire to become like their seniors who are independent. The various campaigns of protection use during sexual relationships are also alleviating the levels of contact of both genders at a tender age. The instance of abortion just like the case of AIDS requires a level of acceptance. Before the emergence of the scourge of HIV, sex before marriage was a taboo (Oakley, p. 324). However, even after its emergence, sex was still a taboo but the virus was quickly spreading. Although the idea of the government to desist funding abortion is active and real, it does not imply that there will be a reduction in the cases of abortion that result. In fact, the funds that the government saves from the act are minimal regarding the amount of funds that hire illegal practitioners to perform the abortion. The fact is despite the risk issues that accrue. The legalization of abortion over the years has led o the decline in most crimes. The states that made the act legal by 1970 are said to experience lower crime rates than the whole nation. The instance thus shows that a restriction of the abortion cases will raise the level of offenses such as murder and rape (Roh J., 73). The other argument that underlies the abolition of the funding is that the instance undermines the right to choice. The case explains that any adult who is of sound mind has a freedom of choice just like one has a freedom of expression. The choice one makes to have a kid justifies the choice to negate the birth of the child. The instance is not inhuman taking into account the various reports of children who are homeless or live in conditions that make it worse for both the child and the parent. The instance also shows a case whereby the government does not differentiate between private and public money (Oakley, p. 325). Counter-argument The most common argument is that life starts at conception and thus abortion is an akin that relates to murder. Abortion is also the act of giving a human the right to take another human’s life. The instance depicts that no society allows the aspect. The other argument assumes that abortions are the direct alternative to abortion. The statement also provides that above a million families are ready to adopt a kid in America alone. In addition, the acts of abortion can result in health complications such as the doubling of ectopic pregnancies. Other views refer to the cases of rape and incest in that good care of the victims can result in them not getting pregnant and thus avoiding abortion. The other instance creates the opinion that abortion should not be other means of contraception. For persons who fight for the rights of full control of the decisions that concern their bodies, the instance provides that the freedom should cover all ways that ensure they do not get pregnant. The fact should be through the application of responsible contraceptive products and methods. The other example acknowledges that most Americans do not support the abortion acts, and that is enough to abolish it on democratic grounds. The cases of abortion mostly involve young women who do not have sufficient information or life experiences. The regrets that follow are numerous, and the act is, therefore, a need to avoid future regrets. Finally, the argument becomes that the psychological pain, as well as the stress, is immense, and thus abortion should not be in practice (Ştefan, p. 930). Reason The arguments, above all, create one sense, the value of human life. The instance also points out that it is the young women who are in practice of the abortion act more than the seniors. The case of rape also ensures that proper care might lead to lack of the need for an abortion since there will be no pregnancy (Hanna, p. 144). Rebuttal Most cases of rape do not see the light of the day. The instance is also valid for incest cases. The cases of adoption do not also apply since many women go for adoption for the fear of disclosure of their pregnancy. The environment that hosts the teenagers includes the internet and the media content rules out the fact that teenage girls do not have any knowledge or experience concerning birth. The instance of abortion does not become murder since it is better to adjourn unnecessary delivery. The primary reason is that unwanted births lead to rejection. Rejection in turn raises criminally like characters who tend to become psychopaths (John, p. 23). Conclusion The instance of the law that abolishes abortion is an assumption that the world is not changing. Study shows an inverse type of relationship between crime and abortion. The best action to take is to create health centers for abortion that will interrogate the participants and investigate the root causes of the pregnancy. The instance will make it easy to eliminate unnecessary abortion cases and help those who are in need of help rather than them searching for help from persons with no knowledge of abortion. Works Cited Doerflinger, Richard M. "Testimony On Behalf Of The USCCB On The No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act." The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 14.1 (2014): pp. 121-130. Hanna, Michael. "WITHDRAWN: Matching Taxpayer Funding To Taxpayer Health Needs." The American Journal of Medicine (2014): 144. John, Keller. "On Knockdown Arguments." Erkenn (2015): 23-33. Oakley, J. "After-Birth Abortion And Arguments From Potential." Journal of Medical Ethics 39.5 (2013): 324-325. Roh J., and F. S. Berry. "Modeling The Outcomes Of State Abortion Funding Referenda: Morality Or Redistributive Policy, Or Both?" State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8.1 (2008): 66-87. Ştefan, Ionuţ. "Arguments For And Against Abortion In Terms Of Teleological And Deontological Theories." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149 (2014): 927- 935. Read More