Download file to see previous pages...
In Comparative Politics, there are two core approaches; the area studies and the cross-national approach. The cross-national approach in Comparative Politics deals with the study of many nation-states with the purpose of addressing certain theoretical questions that apply broadly. In this approach, the tools used in most cases involve empirical data subjected to quantitative analysis. The area studies method places more emphasis on in-depth analysis within a specific region or the borders of a particular country. With this approach, the necessary tools, in most cases, involves the researcher immersing himself into the culture and language of the region under study.
It is important to study states because their power faces considerable threats from growing interconnections and interdependencies and international agreements and arrangements. These threats limit the ability of states to control their individual affairs. These threats include multinational corporations, non-governmental organizations and bodies operating on a global scale. This is evident from the rise of terrorism and other vices, which are not restricted to countries any more. However, states retain the power and responsibility to protect their citizens and undertake other national duties by virtue of having supreme power within their jurisdictions. States are still important, therefore forming the point of departure and focus for comparative approach to government and politics. Comparative Politics has six main approaches: Institutionalism, Systems theory, Governance, Marxism, Structural functionalism, Institutionalism and Corporatism. Institutional analysis forms the basis of Comparative Politics (Caramani, 2).
Comparative Politics is a science because it is guided by various theories (Caramani, 25). Alasdair MacIntyre first raised the question of the possibility of Comparative Politics being a science. The deduction he provided in his analysis was that there was
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
For one, the increasing investment of developed countries in the developing countries has created a lot of interference in the political structure. For instance, the World Bank has argued that, banks in developed countries are likely to invest in the developing countries with weak institutions with an aim of exploiting them (Michaels, 2002).
After the Second World War, the Soviet Union and the United States of America certainly had distinct objectives and goals. America was determined to spread democratic ideas and capitalism while opening new places to do business with in free market. On the other hand, the Soviet Union focused to spread communism and protect its borders from future invasions.
Both the US and USSR signify two contrasting structure of government. In the US the government is being chosen by the means of free election policy. The common man of US has the right of assembly, of speech and of the press. But in the USSR the government is formed by the communist party.
These consequences range from an increase in the intensity of storms and heat waves, to the rise of seas levels (Cities Alliance, 2009, p4). All these changes are experienced at the global level. Abrupt climate change has a number
This is a form of government where each and every individual is allowed to be part of the leadership. This happens through voting where every individual has the right to vote. It is a system where leaders who do not perform as expected standards can be relieved of
The author states that LCAO see the need to reduce the nation’s deficit but proposes and thus proposes a savings mechanism to counter the vast health care inflation. The argument is that the increase in Medicare eligibility age does not meet the required standards because it aims towards increasing the health spending.
In fact, during the era of the cold war, the United States was advocating of a liberal economy. Liberalization of the economy or capitalism is a characteristic of a democratic system of governance. The US government and its allies insisted on the promotion of democracy
Due to the privileges and salary allocated to this position it attracted many prospective suitors. As an organizational policy, the persons to fill the vacant position are first chosen from within the organization. In cases where
The emperors were more powerful than the Senate though patrician families had the freedom to lead public opinion. Even at the early times, the Romans had a constitution for providing checks and balances, as well as separation of balance of power. The early constitution
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Comparitive Politics for FREE!