Download file to see previous pages...
The United States can possibly employ the use of economic pressure to try and force North Korea to return t the six-party negotiations that also include South Korea, Russia, Japan and China. These talks were originally designed to try and help in the establishment of a peaceful resolution to security concerns that happen to result from the nuclear weapons program that had been conducted by North Korea. The United States can endeavor to utilize these talks to try and convince North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program (Cronin, 273).1
The presence of nuclear weapons in the hands of North Korea is of relatively great concern to the United States. If the Six-party negotiations continue to be ineffective, the United States will potentially find itself quite unable to effectively address the concerns posed by nuclear capabilities in North Korea unless it engages directly with the country. A possible concession that can be made is that the United States can pledge that it will not attack North Korea if it willingly shuts down its plutonium program. Other options can involve the withdrawal of American troops from the Korean Peninsula in return for North Korea ending its uranium enrichment program (Cronin, 273).2
If all options fail, and the security of the country remains in critical danger, I would order the complete elimination of the considerable nuclear threat currently being posed by North Korea. A surgical and very speedy attack on the various nuclear weapons development sites across North Korea will have the effect of completely destroying North Korea’s ability to make nuclear bomb. It might also have the effect of precipitating the downfall of the oppressive regime of Kim-Jong-II in addition to sending a an emphatic and clear message that the United States will in no way accept any nuclear proliferation that poses as a threat to it (Ochmanek and Schwartz,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
These are the world’s most deadly arsenal, and its effects have led to strict laws being passed to limit its spread. Iran has witnessed participation in these conventions to promote global peace through signing treaties that limit its activities in the creation of dangerous weapons.
But with change in the political scenario in the light of upheaval of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, the outside assistance stops. Iran again takes to the peaceful nuclear path in 1990s, but its real intentions come to light in 2002 and 2003 that clandestine research has been going on for fuel enrichment and conversion, and it works beyond the scope of peaceful applications of nuclear energy.
Nuclear weapons came into existence as early as around the 1940s and they are the most feared weapons of mass destruction. The concerns raised by the international community only solidify the fears that most people have in nuclear weapons if they are put into active use.
These statutes have remained forwarded to cope with non- governmental performers in global politics as per Article 3, similar to the four Geneva Principles of August 1949. Procedure 1 makes the statute regarding global conflict used in wars fought for self-protection versus rival profession and versus colonialist and ethnic regimes (Beres, 1994).
Consequently, it would be favorable for the United States if they made a paradigm shift in tackling this problem by negotiating with North Koreans.
Ever since the mid twentieth century, North Korea has been engaging in nuclear development. There are two major reasons why this country may have chosen to take on such a venture.
Today, five nations – the U.S., United Kingdom, Russia, China and France – are officially recognised as possessing nuclear weapons. Pakistan and India have tested nuclear weapons and it is not known if Israel possesses nuclear weapon capability. Recently, North
The number of nations seeking nuclear weapons today suggests that a nuclear arsenal may be considered a strategic asset as discussed by Paulikas (2006).
However, for many analysts, the existence of such weapons also comes with a responsibility to not to use them to
l considering the current dragging North Korean nuclear problem, the nuclear issue deteriorated to “The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis” in 1994. Due to the continuity of the problem, it may be argued that North Korean nuclear problem had not been resolved up to now.
The Iran nuclear deal framework was an agreement reached between the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany (P5+1), the European Union and Iran. Negotiations that resulted in the development of the nuclear deal was carried out between foreign ministers of the countries in series of meetings.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Preventing Nuclear Capacities in North Korean or Iran for FREE!