Download file to see previous pages...
There is a great division between human beings globally due to the divergent cultures; notably, conflicts will be caused by the differences in cultures of people. In essence, the clash of civilization is the center of interest. In other words, the current differences and divisions on cultural background is the future battlefield (Webber, 2008). Imperatively, civilization refers to the cultural entities of ethnic groups, villages, religious groups, and nationalities. People are carried around the world at most with the principle of civilization. This situational phenomenon explains the advanced state of human society. This advanced state encompasses the far to which aspects like high levels of industry, science, government, as well as, culture have so far reached (Ridley, 2006). This paper will discuss the future of civilization under the relevant perspectives of system level analysis, state level analysis and individual level analysis in regards to politics.
Conversely, civilization is the broader cultural identity and groupings of individual in the society; they vary, rise and fall, merge and divide, and end with time. It has to be restated that difference among civilization are basic and real. This is because people differentiate themselves based on culture, language, tradition, and religion (Surowiecki, 2004). People in the different culture perceive issues differently such as God, rights of others, equality, hierarchy, and freedom. These differences are real and the source of conflict in the future if not addressed. Discourse on the divergent cultural differences is essential in promoting peace and the future. The differences between cultures are the source of conflicts; however, conflict does not mean violence.
Huntington (2007) asserts that globalization is reducing the world into a community of people through internet and information technology. This has
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The clash of civilizations through different perspectives Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1643877-the-clash-of-civilizations-through-different-perspectives
(The Clash of Civilizations through Different Perspectives Essay)
“The Clash of Civilizations through Different Perspectives Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1643877-the-clash-of-civilizations-through-different-perspectives.
A civilization is included in the category of ancient civilizations if it holds a large number of historic places and cities which exhibit the influence of political and cultural characteristics of that time. Some of the major characteristics of ancient civilizations include high agricultural development, a centralized government, a written language, use of technology, legal codes, division of labor, social stratification, science, philosophy, and arts.
Considered to be a seminal social science work of recent times, Huntington’s theory places international conflicts at the level of civilizations as opposed to smaller identifiers like nation-states, religions, ethnicity, linguistic differences, etc. Huntington reckons that the qualifier of civilization is the broadest and most dominant feature in an individual’s personal identity, thereby making it the primary factor in geo-political events.
The issue was (and is) controversial because it contradicts the classical understandings of creation that are held by most religions. In Victorian England, the research opened up the debate regarding religion and its role in the life of man. The aspects of life that were connected to religion too came under the shadow of doubt as a result of the discoveries that were made by Darwin.
The theory of The Clash of Civilizations was first developed at the American Enterprise Institute, at a lecture, in the year 1992. Later, the theory was progressed in a Foreign Affairs Article, in the year 1993. This was as a response to a 1992 book written by Francis Fukuyuma.
Eyes full of understanding, hearts full of love and the life that refuses conflicts—enough, these alone are enough!
But there are strong issues that prevent the goal of universal peace, according to Samuel P. Huntington. He aptly titles his hunt,
As such, behaviorism does not focus on internal process that may include emotions, feelings, as well as thinking. Behavior holds that, since external behavior is observable, it can be measured in scientific and objective methods. Based on behaviorism,
izations has in fact fueled hate, thereby leading to the pervasiveness of “the Arab, Muslim and Palestinian terrorism” in the 21st century, which is perhaps the single most devastating nightmare to the U.S. and its allies (Wistrich, 2001). The continued onslaught of the U.S.
The most important feature of psychology as, first of all, a practical science is its effectiveness in experimental way. If a theory is applicable to human beings and displays the working patterns of human behaviour this means that its
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The clash of civilizations through different perspectives for FREE!