Analysis of Explaining the Rwandan Genocide - Article Example

The article en d Explaining the Rwandan Genocide explains in significant depth about what could have been the root cause of the Rwanda genocide. From the strong thesis statement, it is clear to the reader what to expect of the article. The article indeed focuses on what is stated in the thesis statement and therefore qualifies in terms of content. The number of sources referred to is adequate, proof that a good level of research was conducted. The references contain all the necessary elements which mean that the information provided can be easily traced to their sources.

The paper is well formatted but not without a few lapses. The abstract for example is centered while it should have been left-aligned. Yet another point of weakness is the lack of a title after the abstract. In any case, the body of the text should always begin on a new page, different from the abstract. As earlier stated, the language used is widely correct but a few minor errors occur. Grammatical errors mainly occur in cases where the sentences are longer than usual. In this sense, the writer can improve by focusing on breaking the long sentences into shorter ones.

Instructions: You have to read the research paper which I attached and you have to write peer review. This research paper is for written by my classmate I have to write about the peer review Each student in the course will have the opportunity to review another students research paper. Review partners will be assigned based on students working on the various genocides. The peer review must be submitted through VSpace to me and bring in one copy for the paper writer on the day of the poster presentations.

Your review must be a one to two pages in length and must contain a discussion of the following: • What did the student do particularly well? • What did the student do poorly? What are the main areas for improvement? • What are the specific strengths and weaknesses of all of the required paper elements? • Did he/she include all of the paper requirements? • Is the paper well written? Does it read well (does it contain transitions and topic sentence)?

Did you find many grammatical errors? • What is your overall assessment of the project at this stage?