Personality Theories - Essay Example

• Personality can be defined as the characters that make who we are. The interaction of people with other people can also be used to determine individual personality. Personality brings out a clear picture of the behaviors as well as feelings of people. Scholars have come up with different methods of analyzing personalities and the best one has been kept in record. Five aspects in life defines and interpret personality according to the studies. The aspects are extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience.

Extensive experience is the intellect of imagination and creativity. The different minds of people that makes them creative to the point that they create imaginations in their mind that allows them to come up with new life ideas. The people with this kind of personality are very good when it comes to facing life changes. Consciencetiones is the ability to control oneself when in social places and make good judgments regardless of the situations. Extroversion is the personality of people that gives them the ability to interact with others. Agreeableness is the personality that enable people to get along. Neuroticism is the personality that makes one to accept oneself. Intelligence on the other hand is the ability to gain knowledge and utilize it later. It is believed that people are intellectuals only that in different levels. There are theories that define and explain intelligence in a much clear manner. The first intelligence theory is the Thorndike's multifunctional theory that states that there is nothing like general ability. Vernon's Hierarchical theory that states there are different levels of intelligence. Theory of emotional intelligence which states one need to be able to motivate oneself. Personality theories, intelligence theories and the team work of intelligence and personality.

Firstly, personality theories are grouped into five categories. Extroversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. The categories can be identified using a team scenario. One needs to have a good personality that allows one to express himself or herself. Communication can be measured using quantity, quality destruction, and critical words. In team building, it is vital to have excellent quality communication, and it is mainly built from oneself. Most of the cases seen in a team, the head of the team must adequately understand the communication personalities of every member of the team. The main reason he needs to understand the personalities is to reduce the cases of having to misjudge one member of the team when he or she is trying to express himself or herself. When asking some questions individually, one tends to be unable to express himself or herself because of the personalities one poses, for example, shyness. When it comes to a team, one can express himself or herself much better in due time. When a team is newly formed, the members are still shying off from one another, but as time goes, they end up knowing and understanding each other. When the members of the team understand one another, their personalities link to one another, and they can express themselves together. The productivity of the team increases, and they can reach the highest point of expression. There is also a combined effort in the team that makes the members struggle to face the obstacles. A person who is not talkative in a team can try and link him or herself to another person of almost a similar personality, making him or her contribution to the group. Unlike when he or she is alone is unable to do anything constructive by oneself. Research shows that the personality of an individual is almost similar to the behavior and communication of an individual (Heggestad 1997). When the psychology needs to assess the capabilities of an individual, they look at how they can express themselves during communication and how fast they link with people. Productive people individually, as well as in the team, seem to have fast communication and a great expression of their characters when they are faced with challenges. Meaning that for a team to have a strong stand in the day to day activities, there is a need for one to understand the personalities of individuals as they significantly affect the team's effectiveness in their work.

Secondly, intelligence has numerous categories that identifies it. Intelligence is the ability of an individual to acquire and gain knowledge of distinctive skills. It is believed that intelligence is carried in an individual DNA and is only expressed when one tries to do things that others cannot. In recent years the scientists have come up with a unique method of determining the intelligence levels of an individual (Furnham 2008). There are also theories that show how an individual is intelligent. Some theories like the emotional theory suggests that the interaction of people is mainly affect by the level of intelligence. It is tough to state how a person is intelligence as the normal questioners are unable to give a clear indication of how intelligence an individual is. Intelligent people find it simple to relate with people after analyzing their personalities, which means that when it comes to expressing their point of view in a team becomes a straightforward thing. Intelligence in an individual can be attributed to self-awareness, self-regulation, empathy, motivation, and social skills, which are the basic core elements in analyzing the intelligence level of a person. Self-awareness enables an individual to understand his or her lane that is necessary for the wellness of an individual. Self-awareness also helps in determining whether an individual is fit to associate with a particular group of people or not. Most of the people have an excellent self-awareness that allows them to associate well in a team. A team that is filled with people who know their limits can appreciate one another and can make a significant difference. The team finds it easy to help one another to overcome challenges and have a good flow of life. Social skills are another attribute of intelligence. It governs the association one has with other people. When a team is filled with people with excellent social skills, they can help one another, and in so doing, they find it easy to face life. The motivation, which is another attribute of intelligence, helps a lot in a team. Motivation enables the co-workers in a team to work to their level best and thus makes them highly productive (Cronbach 1949). For a team to be successful, intelligent people employ the use of persistence, motivation, and vision. They make sure that they work towards the same vision in the team, and this motivates the teammates to work to their level best. The aspect of intelligence in people employs the aspect of persistence and pushes forward the positive aspects of people in achieving the greatest from their work. By employing positive moves in individuals, the team can strive forward-facing the daily consequences of life and archiving the best.

Lastly, both the combination of intelligence and personality . Though the psychologists state that intelligence and personality are two different aspects of life, they both link to one another, making it very possible for teamwork to be productive. For example, people with low intelligence tend to try to highly cautious and trying to be on the safe side always. Thus, in a team, fewer intelligent people are always given the part where care is required because when they are in charge, less damage occurs and thus reduces the risks (Lemmon 200). Studies show that the number of people who are highly intelligent compared to the less intelligent is high, and thus, the personality of the people is the one that makes the life balance in the number of cases of bad things that occur in life.

Psychologists argue that in life, there is the tendency of high intelligence people to try and dominate over the lowly intelligence. The accusation is true though the personality of a person is the one that tries and forces one to do things in a manner that suggests one is intelligent or not. For example, in a case, whether it is a kingdom, the king is supposed to be wise. It rarely occurs that a king is wise enough. Most of the kings have the personality of being wise, but they are not. The people who are very wise in a kingdom are the kings' advisers. The personality of the king's advisers is usually calm, and they pretend to know nothing until the king asks for guidelines in dealing with a given challenge. The intelligent people, when expressing their personality, usually have a challenge and are not able to express themselves clearly, unlike the less intelligent people who have a good personality and can express themselves more clearly and easily. Studies argue that lowly intelligent have an excellent personality to help bridge the gap that is created when they are unable to deal with challenges (Roger 2015). The high intelligence people, on the other hand, need to have a link to the low intelligent people for them to make sense when they are faced with challenges. It is believed that intelligent people do not make sense when they try to make sense to low intelligence people. The same situation occurs when the lowly intelligent people try to make sense among the highly intelligent people, which means that for the low and high intelligence people to work together and meat the same personalities, they have to work together as a team. The combination of intelligence and personality thus brings the best out of people in a team. The core elements that make the team very strong are the intelligence and personality of individuals.

In conclusion, theories of personality work together with the theories of intelligence. For one to determine the full life of an individual he or she needs to understand the intelligence level as well as identify the personality. Theories of personalities help one to know the interaction and association of an individual. The theories of intelligence on the other hand tells of the goals and preference of an individual and how it can affect their interactions. When the combination of intelligence and personality come together the team work in any field is made great.

REFERENCE

Deary, I. J.; Whalley, L. J.; Lemmon, H.; Crawford, J. R.; Starr, J. M. (2000). "The stability of individual differences in mental ability from childhood to old age: follow-up of the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey". Intelligence. 28 (1): 49–55.

Calvin, C.; Batty, G. D.; Deary, I. J. (2011). Cognitive epidemiology: Concepts, evidence, and future directions. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.

Cronbach, L. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. Sternberg, R. J.; Grigorenko, E. L. The general factor of intelligence: How general is it. Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 331–380.

Chamorro-Premuzic, T.; Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence, and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences. 44 (7): 1596–1603.

Furnham, A.; Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality, intelligence, and art. Personality and Individual Differences. 36 (3): 705–715.

Ackerman, P. L.; Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin. 121 (2): 219–245.

Saklofske, D. H.; Kostura, D. D. (1990). Extraversion–introversion and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences. 11 (6): 547–551.

Bates, T. C.; Rock, A. (2004). Personality and information processing speed: Independent influences on intelligent performance. Intelligence.Pg 33–46.

Zuckerman, M.; Spielberger, C. D. Emotions and anxiety: New concepts, methods, and applications. New York:Wiley. pp. 57–81.

Chamorro - Premuzic, T.; Ahmetoglu, G.; Furnham, A. (2008). Little more than personality:Trait determinants of test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences. 18 (2): 258–263.

Wicherts, J. M.; Scholten, A. (2010). Test anxiety and the validity of cognitive tests: A confirmatory factor analysis perspective and some empirical findings. Intelligence. 38: 169–178.

Gow, A. J.; Whiteman, M. C.; Pattie, A.; Deary, I. J. (2005). The personality–intelligence interface: Insights from an ageing cohort. Personality and Individual Differences. 39 (4): 751–761.

Leikas, S.; M¨akinen, S.; L¨ onnqvist, J.E.; Verkasalo, M. (2009). Cognitive ability Emotional stability interactions on adjustment. European Journal of Personality. 23 (4): 329–342.

Séguin, J. R.; Boulerice, B.; Harden, P.; Tremblay, R. E.; Pihl, R. O. (1999). Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory, and IQ. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 40 (8): 1197–1208.

Mayer, J. D.; Salovey, P.; Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits. American Psychologist. 63 (6): 503–517.

MacCann, C.; Joseph, D. L.; Newman, D. A.; Roberts, R. D. (2014). Emotional intelligence is a second-stratum factor of intelligence: Evidence from hierarchical and bifactor models. Emotion.

Montebello, Anthony; Buzzotta, Victor (1993). Work Teams That Work

Salas, Eduardo, Nancy J. Cooke, and Michael A. Rosen (2008). Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 50 (3): 540–547.

Parker, Glenn (2008). Team Players and Teamwork: New Strategies for Developing Successful Collaboration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 1–68.

Chang, Artemis; Bordia, Prashanti; Duck, Julie (2003). Punctuated Equilibrium and Linear Progression: Toward a New Understanding of Group Development. Academy of Management Journal. 46 (1): 106–117.

West, Michael (2012). Effective Teamwork

Woods, Stephen; West, Michael (2014). The Psychology of Work and Organizations.

Hoegl, Martin & Hans Georg Gemuenden (2001) Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science. 12 (4): 435–449.

Hackman, Richard (1990). Groups That Work (and Those That Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. Jossey-Bass. pp. 1–13, 479–504.

Marks, Michelle A., John E. Mathieu, and Stephen J. Zacaro punda (2001). A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes. Academy of Management Review. 26 (3): 356–376.

Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., Mariani, M. e S. Mengoli (2013) Tackling the 'Galácticos' Effect: Team Familiarity and the Performance of Star-Studded Projects, Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(6): 1629-1662.

Stevens, Michael; Campion, Michael (1994). The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications of Human Resource Management. Journal of Management. 20 (2): 503–530.

Katzenbach, Jon; Smith, Douglas (2015). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business School Press. pp. 1–26.

Chin, Roger (2015). Examining teamwork and leadership in the fields of public administration, leadership, and management. Team Performance Management. 21 (3/4): 199–216.

Secondly, intelligence has numerous categories that identifies it. Intelligence is the ability of an individual to acquire and gain knowledge of distinctive skills. It is believed that intelligence is carried in an individual DNA and is only expressed when one tries to do things that others cannot. In recent years the scientists have come up with a unique method of determining the intelligence levels of an individual (Furnham 2008). There are also theories that show how an individual is intelligent. Some theories like the emotional theory suggests that the interaction of people is mainly affect by the level of intelligence. It is tough to state how a person is intelligence as the normal questioners are unable to give a clear indication of how intelligence an individual is. Intelligent people find it simple to relate with people after analyzing their personalities, which means that when it comes to expressing their point of view in a team becomes a straightforward thing. Intelligence in an individual can be attributed to self-awareness, self-regulation, empathy, motivation, and social skills, which are the basic core elements in analyzing the intelligence level of a person. Self-awareness enables an individual to understand his or her lane that is necessary for the wellness of an individual. Self-awareness also helps in determining whether an individual is fit to associate with a particular group of people or not. Most of the people have an excellent self-awareness that allows them to associate well in a team. A team that is filled with people who know their limits can appreciate one another and can make a significant difference. The team finds it easy to help one another to overcome challenges and have a good flow of life. Social skills are another attribute of intelligence. It governs the association one has with other people. When a team is filled with people with excellent social skills, they can help one another, and in so doing, they find it easy to face life. The motivation, which is another attribute of intelligence, helps a lot in a team. Motivation enables the co-workers in a team to work to their level best and thus makes them highly productive (Cronbach 1949). For a team to be successful, intelligent people employ the use of persistence, motivation, and vision. They make sure that they work towards the same vision in the team, and this motivates the teammates to work to their level best. The aspect of intelligence in people employs the aspect of persistence and pushes forward the positive aspects of people in achieving the greatest from their work. By employing positive moves in individuals, the team can strive forward-facing the daily consequences of life and archiving the best.

Lastly, both the combination of intelligence and personality . Though the psychologists state that intelligence and personality are two different aspects of life, they both link to one another, making it very possible for teamwork to be productive. For example, people with low intelligence tend to try to highly cautious and trying to be on the safe side always. Thus, in a team, fewer intelligent people are always given the part where care is required because when they are in charge, less damage occurs and thus reduces the risks (Lemmon 200). Studies show that the number of people who are highly intelligent compared to the less intelligent is high, and thus, the personality of the people is the one that makes the life balance in the number of cases of bad things that occur in life.

Psychologists argue that in life, there is the tendency of high intelligence people to try and dominate over the lowly intelligence. Read More