Morality and Its Different Forms - Case Study Example

2. Are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions? A moral life leads to sanity prevailing within one’s environment and man knows that his life will be manifested for all the right reasons. A moral life changes the basis of an individual and gives him the much needed boost in terms of his thinking mindset, behaviors and actions. It makes him think positively and he starts to take life in a totally new stead for all the right reasons. People start giving the much needed respect to the person who is morally right and who exercise a nice and optimistic control over his life. More than anything else, it is his actions which speak louder than words which is pertinent. Morally it is the duty of any individual to exhibit the best of his abilities by being decently inclined towards each other as well as help and facilitate in a decent manner his undertakings and deals. Morality has its own way of entering one’s life and it is for the person himself to understand what is good for him or otherwise. A lot of philosophers and thinkers of the past have had their due share of ideologies with regards to morality and its different forms. Some of the world’s top names in this field have contributed in one way or the other and the rationale that they have developed over a period of time is something to gain insight from and get enlightened all this while. These philosophers and thinkers have all brought to light the role of different cultures, ideals and so on and so forth but the basic premise is the same – making their mark in the field of morality and contributing to the exact definition of virtue. These names include some of the more known ones like Aristotle, Aquinas, Spinoza, Hume, Keirkegaard, Sarte, James and Nietzsche. Justifying moral decisions has always rested on the shoulders of people who conduct different undertakings in fairness and with a sense of ease when it comes to choosing the morally right and ethically wrong. It is important that human beings understand the true meaning of morality and the manner in which their actions, behaviors, talks and decisions pave a way for the differing after-measures. Philosophy teaches mankind that every action and behavior must be brought forward by the amalgamation of logic, reasoning, education and understanding for each other. Thus whilst making pertinent decisions it is necessary to take care of reason more than emotion itself as the latter could mean having decisions which are based on intent favored for a particular party or person so to speak. Thus it would be wise to state here that reason has got more weight when the comparison is made alongside emotions and feelings. This is because emotion could mean favoring for one particular side while the other side might just lose out in a balancing act which seems to be the missing link in such a scenario. One needs to be fair on all counts before making a decision that has a number of different consequences in essence. Emotion could prove to be a decisive factor at times when devising moral decisions but then again it cannot be compared with the importance that reason and logic brings to the table. Philosophers have rightly remarked reason as having a due advantage over the basis of emotion and gut feeling. This is because they understood what morality and moral decisions actually mean and how the same could bring about a change for the better within the contexts of the different theories of knowledge. Philosophy has been equally strong at suggesting a possible link between reason and emotion. The same is present when emotion and reason work in harmony with each other and thus present a combination of decision-making solution for one and all to see. These kinds of decisions assist philosophical thinking regimes as well as offer something creative and ‘different’ right from the onset of such a mindset from the very beginning. Decision making, by no stretch of imagination is an easy thing. It requires strict vigilance and extreme measures of understanding and comprehension at all levels which occur within it. The actors responsible for devising a certain and specific decision play a pivotal role in the whole ball game which we know as decision making in the first place. Speaking from an ethical context, it is duty bound for any business that has an existence to meet the needs of the customers through the different offerings in the form of its varied products and/or services. It asks for the business to be responsive towards the needs and requirements of the customers and defer the financial sides concerned with the company. It is important though not to ignore the monetary aspect but to remain in the business in the first place for the ones the business is being done, it is essential to situate the resources onto them and then move on forward expanding the market share and the like. Decision making in business is a significant aspect at understanding the scenarios which are presented from the different organizational perspectives. Similarly in science and any other field of study it is a difficult thing and one needs to understand what are the basic ways in which a decision can be arrived at, without wasting much time and using the best tools and techniques in order to achieve the same. These decisions are very crucial to the outcome of a project but certain things should be kept in mind that information is the single most significant thing in this whole process. Decision-making is indeed a very complex and well-developed area, one that has to be looked at by the researchers and lecturers with particular care. People think in different ways. They can either be positive about something or be very pessimistic about an approach. Nevertheless, the positive approach is the one, which is more rational, and understandable, as the negative might lead to something that may not ever happen in the future, yet become a relic. This is without doubt the reason that positive approaches are more or less quite successful. In relation with the decision making aspects, perception is something that relates a feeling or two with a task, a process or a person for that matter. Perception is intrinsic to a person and can or cannot be changed. However it takes a certain period of time to make a move in the mind of this person to change or amend his perception in one way or the other. Perception is also created when there is a positive or negative influence of a decision, product or service that we are talking about here. Perception cannot just remain for a long period of time but the same changes due to differing environments, conditions and atmosphere and so on and so forth. In the end, philosophy is a mixture of logic and psychology. It is an attitude, a viewpoint, and a complete way of life. It encompasses the thinking of a philosopher as to how he depicts a particular situation or an event and how he goes about describing it with his own experiences of the past and what he would have done had he been present in that event or situation. It is all about ideas and how one perceives them. Imagination leads us into a philosophical class where many students are sitting on benches and a lecturer is giving some age-old explanation of a theory devised by an epoch turned scientist, sociologist or theorist. There are ideas that are being imparted to the students by the lecturer, as he delivers his instructions to his learners whereby they get to know more and more about what had happened in the years they were not even born. They come to know about the particular theory at hand and what needs to be done to implement the same in their years to come. May be some question and answers session is also conducted whereby students interact more freely with their fellow students and obviously the teacher. Philosophical thinking demands time and attitude – one that can think on its own about the world sitting at a single place. It is all so technological but not though at the same time. Moral decisions are left better off to the angle related with reason than emotion, all said and done. Bibliography Megone, Chris. Case Histories in Business Ethics. Routledge, 2002 Blake, Robert R. Perception: An Approach to Personality. Ronald Press, 1951 Robinson, Howard. Perception. Routledge, 1994 Evans, J. Psychology Of Deductive Reasoning, 1982 Helms, Marilyn M. Employee Perceptions of the Relationship between Strategy, Rewards and Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Strategies, Vol. 19, 2002 London, Manuel. Leadership Development: Paths to Self-Insight and Professional Growth. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002 Duke, Daniel L. Removing Barriers to Professional Growth. Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 74, 1993 Annas, Julia. Happiness as Achievement. Daedalus, Vol. 133, 2004 Nathanson, Philip. Putting "Strategic" in Human Capital Management. The Public Manager, Vol. 34, 2005 Berkeley, George. Principles of Human Knowledge New York: Doubleday, 1974 Word Count: 1,401 Read More